Session Information
18 SES 14 JS, Physical Activity, Health and Outdoor Education
Joint Paper Session NW 08 and NW 14
Contribution
The aim of this study is to explore the potential of a school excursion to a science museum to increase primary school pupils’ physical activity (PA) during school hours.
As children in developed countries spend approximately one third of their time in school nine months per year (World Health Organization, 2004), and children from all socio-economic and cultural backgrounds can be reached (Nielsen et al., 2011), the school has been identified as an essential setting for promotion of PA (Boreham & Riddoch, 2001). Furthermore, promotion of PA in a school setting has potential to engage the one out of four children (Mygind, 2007) who have no or little interest in in sports and physical activity, that is, children who are in particular risk of performing too little PA.
Simovska et al. (2015) observed school-based initiatives to promote PA are often extra-curricular activities or ‘add-ons’ to schools’ and teachers’ main objectives and everyday practice. Being an extra task on top of other teaching obligations can act as a barrier to the implementation of school based PA promotion initiatives (Simovska et al., 2015), and this may be one of the reasons why the outcomes of school-based interventions are mixed (Pucher et al., 2013). While effective school-based promotion of PA is multifarious and holistic (National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1997), integrating promotion of PA with schools’ main aims and objectives in such a way that teachers and students experience them as ‘add-ins’, rather ‘add-ons’, could facilitate implementation.
Education outside the classroom (EOtC) (Bentsen et al. 2009; 2010; Jordet, 2010) might provide such an add-in, in which PA is an integral part of learning activities. EOtC implies a practice of recurring excursions in which curriculum-based learning takes place. Hereby, settings outside the school, such as cultural institutions, playgrounds, graveyards, green spaces, and forests, are used as settings for learning.The idea of EOtC is, in other words, to provide an engaging learning environment that provides PA while adhering to educational goals through regular curriculum-based excursions to environments external to the school. Furthermore, EOtC, as a mode of active learning that requires equal active participation from all students, has potential to supersede socially and culturally bound differences in PA, for example the well-established gap in levels of PA between boys and girls (Ridgers et al. 2006).
Based on these previous findings, we hypothesise that integrating PA into curriculum-based teaching can contribute to children reaching higher levels of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and decreasing sedentary behaviour. While some research has been carried out on the influence of EOtC on children’s PA levels, to our knowledge, no studies have looked at the potential of school excursions to science centres to increase PA during school hours. This type of learning activity are a common and growing practice in Denmark (Skoletjenesten, 2015) and may provide an easily applied add-in with the potential to increase PA levels. Anecdotal evidence from museum practitioners indicates that children are physically active when visiting science museums. This directs our hypothesis in that we expect children to be more physically active during a school day including an excursion to the science centre compared to an ordinary school day.
While the evidence for the health benefits of PA is sound, there are also strong indications that movement integration in school enhances cognitive function, increases academically standardised test-scores, promotes enjoyment and positive affect, and improves on-task behaviour in children (Webster et al. 2015). Therefore, although health is a justified goal in itself, promotion of PA during school hours appears to feed in to educational purposes also.
Method
Expected Outcomes
References
Bentsen, P., Mygind, E., & Randrup, T. B. (2009). Towards an understanding of udeskole: education outside the classroom in a Danish context. Education 3–13, 37(1), 29–44. Katzmarzyk, P. T. (2010). Physical Activity, Sedentary Behavior, and Health: Paradigm Paralysis or Paradigm Shift? Diabetes, 59(11), 2717–2725. http://doi.org/10.2337/db10-0822 Mygind, E. (2007). A comparison between children’s physical activity levels at school and learning in an outdoor environment. Journal of Adventure Education & Outdoor Learning, 7(2), 161–176. Nielsen, G., Grønfeldt, V., Toftegaard-Støckel, J., & Andersen, L. B. (2011). Predisposed to participate? The influence of family socio-economic background on children’s sports participation and daily amount of physical activity. Sport in Society, 15(1), 1–27. http://doi.org/10.1080/03031853.2011.625271 Nielsen, G., & Schipperijn, J. (2013). Accelerometermåling af fysisk aktivitet. In Metoder i idrætsforskning (1st ed., pp. 256–274). Copenhagen: Munksgaard Danmark. Reilly, J. J., Penpraze, V., Hislop, J., Davies, G., Grant, S., & Paton, J. Y. (2008). Objective measurement of physical activity and sedentary behaviour: review with new data. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 93(7), 614–619. http://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2007.133272 Riddoch, C. J., Mattocks, C., Deere, K., Saunders, J., Kirkby, J., Tilling, K., … Ness, A. R. (2007). Objective measurement of levels and patterns of physical activity. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 92(11), 963–969. Ridgers, N. D., Salmon, J., Parrish, A.-M., Stanley, R. M., & Okely, A. D. (2012). Physical activity during school recess: a systematic review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 43(3), 320–328. Simovska, V., Nordin, L. L., & Madsen, K. D. (2015a). Health promotion in Danish schools: local priorities, policies and practices. Health Promotion International. http://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dav009 Simovska, V., Nordin, L. L., & Madsen, K. D. (2015b). Health promotion in Danish schools: local priorities, policies and practices. Health Promotion International. http://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dav009 Skoletjenesten. (2015). Bilag 5 - Årsberetning 2013-14 med besøgsstatistik. Retrieved from http://www.skoletjenesten.dk//OmSkoletjenesten/~/media/Om_Skoletjenesten/Aarsberetning/Bilag%205%20-%20%C3%85rsberetning%202013-14%20med%20bes%C3%B8gsstatistik%20(100415).pdf Telama, R. (2009). Tracking of Physical Activity from Childhood to Adulthood: A Review. Obesity Facts, 2(3), 187–195. http://doi.org/10.1159/000222244 World Health Organization. (2004). The Physical School Environment - An Essential Component of a Health-Promoting School (Information Series on School Health No. Document No. 2). Geneva: WHO. World Health Organization (2011). Global recommendations on physical activity for health. Webster, C. A., Russ, L., Vazou, S., Goh, T. L., & Erwin, H. (2015). Integrating movement in academic classrooms: understanding, applying and advancing the knowledge base. Obesity Reviews
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.