The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC, 1989) as an international legal text necessitates multiple translations into national policy contexts if it is to become mobilised within professional practice. The aim of this paper is to foreground this process of translation and to identify some of the limitations inherent within present mobilisations of the UNCRC within European contexts. On the basis of this diagnosis, a series of ethical considerations that might inform a more critical and open-ended approach are raised.

Current approaches to mobilising the UNCRC are characterised as an international economy of rights and this is represented diagrammatically. This economy, it is argued, involves multiple translations of the UNCRC text into a series of performative demands to which adults become accountable in situations of professional practice with children and young people.

A critical analysis of this economy as presently instituted is offered that foregrounds a number of inherent limitations (I'Anson, 2016; James, 2007; Thede, 2001) . It is argued that a failure to address the issue of translation from legal text to relational practice has led to a technical resolution. The potential challenge of the UNCRC as an authoritative text of critique is further weakened by the promotion of a consensus thinking (Reinhardt et al., 2012) that privileges agreement over the complexities associated with ethical thinking. In the light of this critique, the paper identifies some new lines of questioning to inform debate concerning how a children’s rights agenda might in future be refracted differently.

I’Anson, J., “UNCRC at 25: a critical assessment of achievements and trajectories with reference to educational research”, in J. Gillett-Swan and V. Coppock, (eds.), Children's Rights, Educational Research and the UNCRC past, present and future, (Oxford: Symposium, 2016: 17-37). James, A., “Giving Voice to Children’s Voices: Practices and Problems, Pitfalls and Potentials”, American Anthropologist, 109 (2), (2007): 261-272. Latour, B., “The strange entanglement of jurimorphs”, A chapter prepared for a volume edited by K. McGee, Bruno Latour and the Passage of Law (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press 2015). Available at: http://www.bruno-latour.fr/node/614 Latour, B., An Inquiry into Modes of Existence: An Anthropology of the Moderns (Cambridge, Massachusetts, and London: Harvard University Press 2013). Latour, B., The Making of Law: An Ethnography of the Conseil d’Etat (Cambridge and Malden, MA.: Polity Press 2009). Latour, B., Reassembling the Social – An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2005). Latour, B., Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies (Harvard University Press 1999). Reynaert, D., Bouverne-De Bie, M. and Vandevelde, S., “Between ‘believers’ and ‘opponents’: Critical discussions on children’s rights”, International Journal of Children’s Rights 20(1) (2012): 155–168. Robbins, J., “Beyond the suffering subject: toward an anthropology of the good”, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (N.S.), 19 (2013): 447-462. Thede, N., “Human Rights and Statistics – Some Reflections on the No-Man’s-Land between Concept and Indicator”, Statistical Journal of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, 18 (2-3) (2001): 259-273. United Nations, The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC), General Assembly resolution 44/25 (20 Nov. 1989) U.N. Doc. A/ RES/44/25. Available at: http://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/crc.aspx