Pitfalls of participation research
Author(s):
Tomi Kiilakoski (presenting / submitting) Reetta Niemi (presenting)
Conference:
ECER 2017
Format:
Paper

Session Information

25 SES 03, Participatory Research

Paper Session

Time:
2017-08-22
17:15-18:45
Room:
W4.13
Chair:
Nina Thelander

Contribution

Pupils’ voices and participation have received increased attention both practically and theoretically in the past decade, a development which is often attributed to the ratification of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) (Lundy 2007). Participation as the right to be heard is seen as one of the fundamental principles of the UNCRC. The right of the child to express his or her views is an absolute right, expressed in Article 12 of the UNCRC. It guarantees the opportunity for children  to express their views, and also to have their views taken seriously. Participation is also connected to other goals of the treaty: “child participation is a tool to stimulate the full development of the personality and the evolving capacities of the child” (CRC 2009, p. 17.) Therefore studying the quality and effectiveness of different methods for promoting participation is needed to evaluate how well educational institutions are able to fulfill their role as supporters and nurturers of growth as a person and as a citizen.

Children’s participation has been one of the most debated and examined aspects of the Convention on the Rights of the Child (Landsdown, 2010; Lundy, 2007). One of the reasons for the debates relates to the concept’s lack of clarity. For example, it is unclear what is meant by “participation” in the context of children’s rights (Landsdown, 2010). Accordingly, in the educational literature the concept of participation does not have one shared definition. The concept refers generally to the process of sharing decisions that affect children’s lives and the life of the community in which they live. It should start with children and young people themselves—on their own terms, with their visions, dreams, hopes, and concerns.  (Hart, 1992; Shier, 2001; Gresalfi et al, 2009).

In educational literature there are different kinds of models through which pupils’ participation can be understood and promoted (e.g. Hart 1009; Shier 2001; Lundy 2007). There are many studies that have reported how pupils have participated on planning school events, improving school environment or improving classroom practices, but there are not many research available from pupils’ experienced participation despite the importance of the experiental factors of participation.

Our conception of participation defines participation as a relational phenomenon. Firstly, participation involves having a (formally and/or informally) recognized position as an agent. Secondly, participation should manifest itself in action (in sayings, doings, relatings). Thirdly, participation should produce a feeling of participation. (Kiilakoski, Gretchel & Nivala 2012.) This theoretical perspective defines participation as having social and political, as well as evocative components. To evaluate participation one should be able to analyse 1. both formal and informal roles of pupils (including encouragement and training), 2. The practices, discourses and activities that these roles will bring about, and lastly 3. The experiences of the children themselves about participation. In our understanding, succesful research on participation requires analysing the lived experience of the children, their roles in the learning environment and the nature and quality of activities.

Based on the above, twe address following research questions in this presentation:

  1. Based on our efforts to analyse participation, what pitfalls are there in analysing participation as a lived experience?

  2. How could the use of expressive, in particular visual methodologies help us as researchers to overcome these pitfalls?

Method

Our study has features in common with hermeneutical and phenomenological approaches. Phenomenological research asks what is the nature of the phenomenon as meaningfully experienced. Max van Manen calls this lived experience (van Manen 1990, 40–41). The hermeneutical emphasis of this study is placed on interpretation. One way to meet the challenge of the pitfalls of participation has been to apply visual and participatory research methods to capture pupils’ perspectives on their lives. For example photo-elicitation has often been used to enhance informants’ engagement in interviews, challenge participants, provide nuances, trigger memories and lead to new perspectives and explanations (Lapenta, 2011). The use of photographs has been identified as particularly helpful for pupils to document and communicate their perspectives of what constitutes a meaningful classroom experience (Caine, 2010; Clark, 2010; Cook & Hess, 2007; Kumpulainen et al., 2013; Smith, Duncan, & Marshall, 2005). The use of photographs has also been reported to help young people talk about their experiences instead of discussing something in the abstract (Cook & Hess, 2007). This paper is based on two substudies in which visual methods were used in order to capture pupils experienced participation. First of these used visual material produced by researchers, and the second one by the pupils. The first study involved a visual etnography there a researcher draw the notes. Her background as a visual artist helped her to document the field. The interpretations based on drawings were triangulated with prior interview data. The second study is a teacher-research and relies methodologically under the umbrella of educational action research (Kemmis 2006). The study took place in a suburban elementary school district in the city of Helsinki, Finland. A total of 21 pupils (11 girls, 10 boys) and one teacher participated in the study. The data collection took place between September 2016 and January 2017. At the time of the research, the pupils were in the second grade (approximately 8 years old). The classroom also had one third of multicultural pupils, four of whom did not speak Finnish as a first language. The data consisted of 21 diamond 9s, 61 stairs of participation (related to Roger Hart’s model) and 40 peer interviews.

Expected Outcomes

Based on our earlier research, we have identified a typology of pitfalls of participation research. These include (but are not limited to): Troubles in verbalising: the young are not always willing, interested or even capable of analysing their participation. Perhaps the concept itself is sometimes too difficult. Problem of inadequate information: sometimes children lack necessary information to evaluate their role. In our interviews they sometimes feel that the already made administrative decisions are of their influence. Problem of adult-led interpretations. Regardless of the data, analysing is usually dependent on the interviewer’s interpretations, which may have an overtly critical of sympathetic bias. This problem is emphasised in cases there the researchers evaluate their own pedagogical activities. Problem of hidden and silenced featues: participation involves a social element (belonging, memebership). These sensitive matters are not always brought to the attention of the adults. When lacking this information researchers are likely to mis-interpret things. Problem of time-frame: the long-lasting effects of participation are sometimes hard to analyse because of the time-frame of the study. As a way to react to these pitfalls we have both together and separately developed ways to use visual methodologies to analyse participation. This presentations will reflect the question to what extent these experiments have been successful.

References

Clark, A. (2010). Young children as protagonists and the role of participatory, visual methods in engaging multiple perspectives. American Journal of Community Psychology 46, 115–123. Cook, T., & Hess, E. (2007). What the camera sees and from whose perspective. Fun methodologies for engaging children enlightening adults. Childhood 14 (1), 29–45. Committee on the Rights of the Child (CRC) (2009): General Comment No. 12. The RIght of the Child to be Heard. Hart, R.A. (1992). Children’s Participation, from Tokenism to Citizenship. UNICEF:Florence. Kemmis, S. (2006). Participatory action research and the public sphere. Educational Action Research 14 (4), 459–476. Kiilakoski, T. Gretschel, A. & Nivala, E. (2012). Osallisuus, kansalaisuus ja hyvinvointi [Participation, citizenship and well-being]. In A. Gretschel & T. Kiilakoski (eds.) Demokratiaoppitunti. Lasten ja nuorten kunta 2000-luvun alussa. Nuorisotutkimusverkosto / Nuorisotutkimusseura, julkaisuja 118, 11-19. Landsdown, G. (2010). The realisation of children’s participation rights: critical reflections. Teoksessa B. Percey-Smith & N. Thomas (toim). A Handbook of Children and Young People’s Participation. Perspectives from Theory and Practice. Oxon: Routledge, 11-23. Lapenta, F. (2011). Some theoretical and methodological views on photo-elicitation. In E. Margolis & L. Pauwels (eds.), The SAGE handbook of visual research methods (pp. 201-213). London: Sage Publications. Lundy, L. (2007). Voice’ is not enough: conceptualising Article 12 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. British Educational Research Journal 33 (6), 927–942 Malone, K & Hartung, C. (2010). Challenges of participatory practices with children. Teoksessa B. Percey-Smith & N. Thomas (toim.) A Handbook of Children and Young People’s Participation. Perspectives from Theory and Practice. Oxon: Routledge, 24-38. Niemi, R., Kumpulainen, K., & Lipponen, L. (2015a). Pupils’ documentation enlightening teachers’ practical theory and pedagogical actions. Educational Action Research 23 (4), 599-614. Niemi, R., Kumpulainen, K., & Lipponen, L. (2015b). Pupils as active participants: Diamond ranking as a tool to investigate pupils’ experiences of classroom practices. European Educational Research Journal. 10.1177/1474904115571797 Shier, H. (2001) Pathways to Participation: Openings, Opportunities and Obligations. A New Model for Enhancing Children’s Participation in Decision-making, in line with Article 12.1 of the United Nations Convention of the Right of the Child. Children and Society 15,pp.107-117. van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. New York: State University of New York Press.

Author Information

Tomi Kiilakoski (presenting / submitting)
Finnish Youth Research Network
Oulu
Reetta Niemi (presenting)
Viikki Teacher Training School, University of Helsinki

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.