Main Content
Session Information
06 SES 02, Media Practices: Perspectives and experiences
Paper Session
Contribution
The point of departure of this project is the NRK (Norwegian Broadcasting Corporation)TV series “Skam”. NRK describe SKAM [...] “as a fictional teen TV series made by NRK that focuses on universal teen challenges like love, friendship, identity, peer pressure, sex, religion and status [..]” (NRK.no).
The TV series has been sold to many countries in and outside Europe, and
SKAM has been widely considered by both youth and adults, nationally and internationally. According to reviewers, the series has even been described that it's concerning how it is to be young today. In what can be perceived as a dominant interpretation of the series, differences in reception are a little evident. The main aim of the project is to try to find out how the TV series is perceived among different groups of youth. They will be about the same age as in the series, primarily in 3rd grade at upper secondary schools, students over 18 years old. We are involving youth groups from different geographical and social backgrounds, and gender will also become an important variable.
According to Jo Sondre Moseng (2011a), the themes for what are termed “teen-pics” have remained more or less constant since this type of film genre first appeared in the 1950s. These themes include independence, love, gender, sexuality, group pressure and friend relationships, but whereas the teen-pic is about youth and is made by adults, we are concerned with films made by youth, even though they are not all about youth.
There are signs indicating that the generation gap is changing character today since both youth and adults have to relate to so many of the same challenges arising from the rapid pace of change. However, in a hypercomplex society in which reflexive observations are a necessary condition for managing complexity, individual and subjective perspectives will tend to dominate (Qvotrup 1998 and 2004; Selwyn 2005). Furthermore, it is natural in such a context that adults and young people in different phases of life and with different life experience should also have different views of themselves and society. In accordance with this, the teen-pics analysed by Moseng should differ from a serie like SKAM. In the films about youth made by adults, the solution to the challenges experienced by youth is to struggle for more insight and finally to be able to establish an adult’s identity (Moseng, 2011b, p. 165). If SKAM represents the voice of the youth it is interesting to know what distinguishes this series from the typical youth movies made by adults. We expect that in SKAM there are no simple solutions of this kind, as it’s not about becoming adults. This is in line with Thuens (2008) description of the radical change in how young people is viewed, not via adults eyes, but on their own terms.
Central to the research project is also the question of what is perceived as positive? Do young people identify with the content because it can be linked to their own experiences, or is the series perceived primarily as good fiction with more generally relevant topics for youth and for others? If Skam can be linked to their own experiences the question is if it has a separate voice of youth that describes youth from their own point of view and unlike the adults' description of youth in “teen-pics”, and what that voice is about (Fritze & Haugsbakk, 2016). If Skam is percieved as a god fiction with relevant topics, how does it differ from other teen-pics?
Method
In the project, the key research questions will be attempted answered through interviews with young people. In addition to three focus group interviews with 3rd grade at three upper secondary schools, we have conducted a questionnaire survey with all involved students at the relevant school stage (a total of approximately 200 students have answered the questionnaire). It is desirable to bring students from general and from vocational subjects, as well as from rural areas and from the city.
Expected Outcomes
The main aim is to get deeper insight into the differences in how the TV series Skam is perceived by different youth groups, and what might be the cause.
References
Fritze, Y. & Haugsbakk, G. (2016). The Voice of Youth – On Reflexivity in Young Filmmakers’ Films. In Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy. 04/2012. Moseng, J. S. (2011a). Himmel og helvete. Ungdom i norsk film 1969-2010. Avhandling for philosophia doctor. NTNU, Institutt for kunst- og mediefag. Moseng, J. S. (2011b). Mainstream forvirring? Norsk ungdomsfilm. I E. Bakøy og T. Helseth (red.), Den andre norske filmhistorien (s. 152 – 167). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget. NRK website. Downloaded 2501218 from: https://www.nrk.no/presse/programomtaler/everything-you-need-to-know-about-skam-1.13465189 Qvortrup, L. (1998). Det hyperkomplekse samfund. 14 fortællinger om informationssamfundet. København: Gyldendal. Qvortrup, L. (2004). Det vidende samfund - mysteriet om viden, læring og dannelse. København: Unge Pædagoger. Selwyn, N. (2005). Reflexivity and technology in adult learning. Seminar.net. International journal of media, technology and lifelong learning Vol.1, issue 1. Downloaded 20.01.2012 from: http://seminar.net/index.php/volume-1-issue-1-2005-previousissuesmeny-108/27-neil-selwyn-reflexivity-and-technology-in-adult-learning Stam, R. (1992). Reflexivity in film and literature. From Don Quixote to Jean-Luc Godard. New York: Columbia University Press. Thuen, H. (2008). Om Barnet. Oppdragelse, opplæring og omsorg gjennom historien. Oslo: Abstrakt forlag. Thyssen, O. (2002). Dannelse i moderniteten. Dansk Pædagogisk Tidsskrift, no.2. Ziehe, T. & Stubenrauch, H. (1983). Ny ungdom og usædvanlige læreprocesser. Kulturell frisættelse og subjektivitet. København: Politisk revy.
Programme by Network 2019
00. Central Events (Keynotes, EERA-Panel, EERJ Round Table, Invited Sessions)
Network 1. Continuing Professional Development: Learning for Individuals, Leaders, and Organisations
Network 2. Vocational Education and Training (VETNET)
Network 3. Curriculum Innovation
Network 4. Inclusive Education
Network 5. Children and Youth at Risk and Urban Education
Network 6. Open Learning: Media, Environments and Cultures
Network 7. Social Justice and Intercultural Education
Network 8. Research on Health Education
Network 9. Assessment, Evaluation, Testing and Measurement
Network 10. Teacher Education Research
Network 11. Educational Effectiveness and Quality Assurance
Network 12. LISnet - Library and Information Science Network
Network 13. Philosophy of Education
Network 14. Communities, Families and Schooling in Educational Research
Network 15. Research Partnerships in Education
Network 16. ICT in Education and Training
Network 17. Histories of Education
Network 18. Research in Sport Pedagogy
Network 19. Ethnography
Network 20. Research in Innovative Intercultural Learning Environments
Network 22. Research in Higher Education
Network 23. Policy Studies and Politics of Education
Network 24. Mathematics Education Research
Network 25. Research on Children's Rights in Education
Network 26. Educational Leadership
Network 27. Didactics – Learning and Teaching
Network 28. Sociologies of Education
Network 29. Reserach on Arts Education
Network 30. Research on Environmental und Sustainability Education
Network 31. Research on Language and Education (LEd)
Network 32. Organizational Education
The programme is updated regularly (each day in the morning)
Marginal Content
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.