International curriculums have gained rapid traction in the education market with institutions providing international benchmarks for global performance. The growing interest in the International Baccalaureate Diploma Programme (IB DP) stems largely from the basis that the curriculum offers various educational benefits in comparison to non-IB DP curriculums. The programme aims to develop ‘inquiring, knowledgeable and caring’ students to meet the needs of the twenty-first century (IB, 2020a), and IB DP graduates are believed to ‘perform well academically – often better than students in other programmes’ as illustrated by the number of students who enroll at top universities around the world (IB, 2020b). As a result, the IB DP has been endorsed worldwide as a curriculum of choice for mobile futures and elite post-secondary education.
Given the growing worldwide attention to the IB DP, a number of local education authorities in South Korea (hereafter Korea) have begun to propose the implementation of the IB DP in public high schools, which has been only offered in international schools or a few elite high schools. Despite Korea’s longstanding high ranking in international assessments, some scholars and policymakers have declared that the current national curriculum is no longer fit for the globalized economy. In fact, local curriculums are being interpreted as outdated and failing to provide the knowledge and skills needed for the global economy (Hong, 2019). Thus, the advocates of the implementation of the IB DP in public high schools state that a wider accessibility to the programme will help more students acquire global capital and become internationally competitive (Hong & Lim, 2019), as well as galvanize teaching practices to be student-centered and inquiry-based.
However, although Korean scholars believe that the IB DP is superior to the current national curriculum for its pedagogically progressive qualities and globally renowned status, closer scrutiny reveals that these prevalent perceptions are not undergirded by empirical data (Hong, 2019; Kim, 2018; Ryu & Kim, 2018). Besides, although many studies have investigated the long-term outcomes of participating in the IB DP, studies on the voices and lived experiences of students who took part in the IB DP are missing. In particular, narratives concerning students’ IB DP experiences and whether they believe the IB DP is truly beneficial have been absent both in the global and Korean context.
In addition, it is important to understand how the cultural backgrounds of students shaped their experiences of the IB DP and how the participation in the IB DP influenced their later experiences in local society. According to Rizvi and Lingard (2010, p. 24), ‘the globalized world is fundamentally heterogeneous, unequal and conflictive, rather than integrated and seamless’. As students are bound to modify and reinterpret the ideas, instructions, and goals through local realities (Anderson-Levitt, 2003), the cultural backgrounds of students and the academic context of Korea must be taken into account. Given the global-local nexus, students’ individual experiences may not align with the prominent beliefs of the IB DP and thus need to be carefully examined.
For such reasons, this study aimed to gain a better understanding of students’ IB DP experiences through these research questions: (1) How did the IB DP graduates experience and respond to the structure of the IB DP? (2) How did the IB DP graduates experience the teaching and instruction of the IB DP? (3) How did the Korean backgrounds of the IB DP graduates intersect with the IB DP? By examining the IB DP graduates’ experiences and perceptions and analyzing them within the global-local nexus, this paper draws broader implications on the implementation of the IB DP.