Session Information
22 ONLINE 22 D, Universities vs. Research Institutes? Overcoming the Soviet Legacy of Higher Education and Research
Panel Discussion
MeetingID: 873 4490 5285 Code: XG7PP9
Contribution
Universities and non-university research institutes have been recognised as two key sectors producing research globally. Research institutes were conceived as organisations with the sole function of undertaking research. Depending on the historical and geographic contexts, universities have been seen either as primarily educational organisations or as organisations combining educational and research functions.
The Soviet Union represented a case of the organisational separation of higher education and research. The bulk of research was carried out by the institutes of the USSR Academy of Sciences and the republican academies, as well as, on the applied side, by the industry research institutes. Universities played a minor role in the development of Soviet science, as higher education institutions were mostly thought of as teaching establishments.
The dissolution of the Soviet Union brought radical changes. Literature that looks at the transformation of higher education in post-Soviet countries largely centres around the educational mission of universities and how universities as educational institutions have changed in the years following the dissolution of the Soviet Union (Balasanyan, 2018; Chankseliani, 2016, 2021; Chankseliani et al., 2020, 2021; Heyneman, 2008, 2010; Huisman et al., 2018; Oleksiyenko et al., 2018). While there exist studies on research universities and research capacity in selected former Soviet countries (Abramova & Krasheninnikov, 2017; Hladchenko, 2020; Hladchenko et al., 2016; Jonbekova, 2018; Kataeva & DeYoung, 2018; Lee & Kuzhabekova, 2019), this is a much smaller body of literature which points to the fact that the research mission of universities has been somewhat neglected. This is hardly surprising as universities have been seen as primarily educational institutions in this region. Another reason of the relatively limited scholarly attention to university-based research is that the research mission pertains to the global dimension of university operation. ‘The research university is a national project whose field of operation is often global. The global and national dimensions are heterogeneous in form and purpose. In the national dimension the purpose is the nation as an end in itself. The global dimension has no purpose. There the university is its own purpose’ (Marginson, 2011, p. 412). Due to the traditions of top-down management, limited institutional autonomy and academic freedom, embracing the global dimension, where ‘the university is its own purpose’ has proven to be challenging in most former Soviet countries.
Yet, as the panel will demonstrate, in most post-Soviet countries, universities have been developing their research activities by looking at new sources of research funding, adjusting the ways in which they paid academics and motivated them to do research. In several of these countries, institutional structures have been transformed to support the development of research capacity at universities.
In the context of the limited funding for research, universities and research institutes compete for the finite pot of research funding in the majority of the former Soviet countries. The dispersion of research funding to the two sectors leads to two consequences. First, it reduces the chance of concentrating research within the higher education sector where the research activity is likely to feed into teaching activity and produce broader public benefits. Second, it hinders the process of developing strong research universities.
This panel presents the results of several yet unpublished empirical studies which look at the organisational separation of higher education and research in this region. The former Soviet countries share a common history, common policies and practices of higher education. These commonalities make the regional focus meaningful and analytically valid. Empirically grounded presentations on developing research capacity at universities in the former Soviet countries offer important insights into mechanisms of institutional and policy change in higher education more generally.
References
Abramova & Krasheninnikov (2017). Interaction of Science and Education in Soviet and Post-Soviet Russia (on the example of the Republic of Sakha, Yakutia). HERJ Hungarian Educational Research Journal, 7(4) Balasanyan (2018). From Pedagogy to Quality: The Europeanised Experience of Higher Education in Post-Soviet Armenia. European Educational Research Journal, 17(4) Chankseliani (2016). Escaping Homelands with Limited Employment and Tertiary Education Opportunities: Outbound Student Mobility from Post-Soviet Countries. Population, Space and Place, 22(3) Chankseliani (2021). The politics of exporting higher education: Russian university branch campuses in the ‘Near Abroad’. Post-Soviet Affairs, 37(1) Chankseliani, Gorgodze, Janashia, & Kurakbayev (2020). Rural Disadvantage in the Context of Centralised University Admissions: A Multiple Case Study of Georgia and Kazakhstan. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 50(7) Chankseliani, Qoraboyev, & Gimranova (2021). Higher Education Contributing to the Local, National, and Global Development: New Empirical and Conceptual Insights. Higher Education, 81(1) Heyneman (2008). Three universities in Georgia, Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan: The struggle against corruption and for social cohesion. PROSPECTS, 37(3) Heyneman (2010). A Comment on the Changes in Higher Education in the Post-Soviet Union. In I. Silova (Ed.), Globalization on the margins: Education and post-socialist transformations in Central Asia Hladchenko (2020). Academic Identities in Ukrainian Research Universities Under Conditions of Means-Ends Decoupling at the State Level. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 44(2) Hladchenko, Boer & Westerheijden (2016). Establishing Research Universities in Ukrainian Higher Education: The Incomplete Journey of a Structural Reform. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 38(2) Huisman, Smolentseva & Froumin (Eds.). (2018). 25 Years of Transformations of Higher Education Systems in Post-Soviet Countries—Reform and Continuity. Palgrave Macmillan. Jonbekova (2018). Educational Research in Central Asia: Methodological and Ethical Dilemmas in Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 0(0) Kataeva & DeYoung (2018). Faculty Challenges and Barriers for Research and Publication in Tajik Higher Education. European Education, 50(3) Lee & Kuzhabekova (2019). Building Local Research Capacity in Higher Education: A Conceptual Model. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 41(3) Marginson (2011). Strategizing and Ordering the Global. In R. King, S. Marginson, & R. Naidoo (Eds.), Handbook on Globalization and Higher Education Oleksiyenko, Zha, Chirikov & Li (Eds.). (2018). International Status Anxiety and Higher Education: The Soviet Legacy in China and Russia.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.