Session Information
17 SES 16 A, Contested Identities in Europe – Historical Insights into the Construction of Citizenship Education from the Bottom up
Symposium
Contribution
In 1969, Hungary firstly participated in a western educational project since the communist takeover (1949); it was the Six Subject Survey, initiated by the IEA. Civic Education produced a big problem in the research, as Professor Árpád Kiss, the driving force of the Hungarian team wrote in a letter to Neville Postlethwaite: we couldn’t record these tests, «because our aims and objectives in Civic Education deviate from yours in so many respects»(Kiss, 1969). Our question is targeting to this core point: What are the meanings of the umbrella term civic/citizenship education in a non-democratic society? The timeframe of our overview will last from the restauration of the communist power after the revolution (1957) to the crisis of the existing socialism (mid-1980s), the so-called Kádár Era. We would like to highlight the discrepancies between the official (and idealistic) images of conscious, active socialist citizens and the reality of different reactions to these needs from apathy to imitate the requested attitudes. The ideological scheme was stable during these decades, but the interpretations of the key notions (socialist democracy, socialist citizenship, internationalism, and so on) differed in many ways. According to an overall accepted hypothesis in Hungary, the state incorporated and nationalized its citizens through the obligatory political socialization of the schools after WW2 (Szabó, 2000; Jakab, 2022). The direction was opposite to the practice of Western countries in that time: civic education did not speak about rights, autonomy and individual conditions needed to defend from the encroachments of a strong state, but to subordinate these to the Marxist-Leninist ideology. Contemporary analyses about the history of Hungarian citizenship education usually started the detailing story from the 1990s (Dancs & Fülöp, 2020; Hera & Szeger, 2015; Holle & Ványi, 2022): we would like to show the roads leading to here.
References
Dancs, K. & Fülöp, M. (2020). Past and present of social science education in Hungary. Journal of Social Science Education, 19(1), 47–71. Hera, G. & Szeger, K. (2015). Education for Democratic Citizenship and Social Inclusion in a Post- Socialist Democracy. In Majhanovich, S. & Malet, R. (Eds.), Building Democracy through Education on Diversity. Leiden, Brill, 41–56. Holle, A. & Ványi, É. (2022). Conceptualizing Citizenship. Eastern European Inputs to the Contemporary Debates. Insights from Hungary. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, European and Regional Studies, 21(1), 1–24. Jakab, Gy. (2022). Demokrácia demokraták nélkül? Oktatási reform és állampolgári nevelés [Democracy without democrats? Educational reform and citizenship education]. Gondolat, Budapest. Kiss, Á. (1969). Letter to Neville Postlethwaite. Hoover Institute, IEA Archive, Vol. 59. Szabó, I. (2000). A pártállam gyermekei [Children of Party-State]. Új Mandátum, Budapest.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.