Successful teaching of statistics for students of educational sciences – Mission impossible?
Author(s):
Conference:
ECER 2010
Format:
Paper

Session Information

27 SES 06 B, Approaches to Science

Paper Session

Time:
2010-08-26
10:30-12:00
Room:
M.B. SALI 12, Päärakennus / Main Building
Chair:
Kirsti Klette

Contribution

 

Studies on university level statistics instruction, particularly in the social and educational sciences, suggest that courses on quantitative research methods are challenging both for teachers and for students (e.g. Rautopuro, Väisänen & Malin 2007). Factors that cause learning problems in quantitative methods can be associated with students’ non-cognitive of socio-personal factors, such as negative emotions, resistant attitudes, beliefs, lack of motivation as well as mathematics and statistics anxiety, weak self-confidence in learning statistics, and low self-efficacy (e.g. Rautopuro, Väisänen & Malin 2007; Murtonen 2005). It has also been noted that the university students’ poor skills and enduring misconceptions in statistics still exist after one or more courses of statistics (e.g. Hirch & O’Donnel 2001). To overcome these difficulties the following teaching method was developed and afterwards evaluated by the presenter: 1) Teaching the basics of how to make a good inquiry and making the inquiry of students own (subjects decided by the students), 2) Gathering the students own data, 3) Teaching the basic and selected advanced methodology of analyzing statistical data, 4) Analyzing the data (by students), 5) Writing a short research report.

Method

The course in question was held at the faculty of Education (University of Jyväskylä) and it consisted of 16 hrs lecturing and 6 hrs of guided rehearsing with SPSS –program (implemented twice during the academic year 2007-08). The group of students attending to this course included students from three different major subjects (i.e. education, adult education, and early childhood education) having different backgrounds of studying quantitative methodology in advance. Altogether 75 students attended and 45 students answered the feedback inquiry.

Expected Outcomes

The results of the feedback inquiry were encouraging. The students felt that 1) they were able to gain the aims of the course (M=3.95, SD= .861; scale being from 1 to 5), 2) the learning experience was meaningful and reasonable (M=4.34, SD=.888), and 3) the learning and teaching methods in question were enabling effective learning (M=4.36, SD=.810). In open ended questions students emphasized that the fears they have had towards quantitative methodology were diminished and the motivation for using it in future had increased. They also emphasized that the factors behind the successful implementation of the course were associated with the pedagogical skills of the teacher, realistic but at the same time optimistic attitude of the teacher and also the successful combination of theory and practice.

References

Hirch, L.S. & O’Donnel, A.M. (2001). Representativeness in statistical reasoning. Identifying and assessing misconceptions. Journal of Statistics Education, 9. Murtonen, M. (2005). University students’ research orientations – Do negative attitudes exist toward quantitative methods? Scandinavian Journal of educational Research, 49, 263-280. Rautopuro, J., Väisänen, P. & Malin, A. (2007). From misundestanding to misapplication? Difficulties encoutered by Finnish students of education in learning quantitative research methods. In M. Murtonen, J. Rautopuro, & P. Väisänen (Eds.) Learning and teaching of research methods at university. Finnish Educational Research Association. Research in Educational Sciences 30, 17-38.

Author Information

HUMAK University of Applied Scineces
Kuopio

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.