Propective teachers’ views regarding the impact of effective teaching strategies on student motivation
Author(s):
Conference:
ECER 2010
Format:
Paper

Session Information

27 SES 08 C, The Knowledge of Teachers in Professional Development

Paper Session

Time:
2010-08-26
17:15-18:45
Room:
M.B. SALI 13, Päärakennus / Main Building
Chair:
Meinert Arnd Meyer

Contribution

Motivation is regarded as being one of the most influential agents on the learning process. Several researchers state that motivation can be considered as the ‘will to learn’ and is at the heart of the learning process (Johnston, 1996, cited in Harlen and Crick, 2003) and always will be integral to the teaching and learning process (Martin et al., 1997). Motivation is also a key concept in successful learning (Reece & Walker, 1997; Givvin, Stipek, Salmon & MacGyvers, 2001; cited in Zoldosova and Prokop, 2005) and is influential in student achievement (Rudduck and Flutter, 2004, p.44).

Motivation cannot be explained using only one dimension. According to Bouffard and Couture (2003) motivation is based on a variety of elements. Brophy (1999), for instance, states that several lines of theory and research suggest that matches between learners' perceptions of themselves and their perceptions of learning opportunities have strong potential for fueling motivation to learn. On the other hand, instructors have a significant responsibility to increase motivation through the learning atmosphere or to improve the current level of motivation. Linnenbrink and Pintrich (2003)have pointed out that, it is interesting for teachers to have students with different levels of motivation and therefore becomes more challenging. Even though one of the most important components of learning is motivation (Yükseltürk and Bulut, 2005, p.96), one of the most common questions academics ask of educational developers is how to motivate students in their learning (Kember, Ho and Hong, 2008). This suggests that motivating students is not easy task for teachers even though they also agree that motivation is a very important factor in classroom learning (Moore, 1998). Teachers might affect students’ motivation directly or indirectly (Reeve, 1996; cited in Hardre et al., 2006). Capel et al., (1995, p.94) points out that the central aim for teachers is to motivate pupils enough to make them want to learn. In a similar way, Hardre et al., (2006) argue that the decisions made by teachers during the instructional process influence the student’s level of motivation. In a sense, the crucial point here is that: what should teachers do to motivate all the students in the teaching and learning atmosphere? According to Moore (1998) many factors might have an effect on students’ motivation. An attractive room, good communication, teacher movement, group activities and student-centered teaching strategies such as cooperative learning, the use of individualized instructional strategies, gestures, for example, might be motivational factors.

Although the factors which affect learning have been frequently discussed in the related literature, the studies on motivation are mainly theoretical, and there appears to be less practical research in this area. From this point, in this study, motivation is investigated in relation to effective teaching strategies based on prospective teachers’ views which is different viewpoint towards the research on this area. Based on the related literature, the main aims of the study is to identify the prospective teachers’ views on the impact of effective teaching strategies towards students’ motivation.

Method

A total of 144 prospective teachers enrolled in four different departments of faculty of education in a university, in Turkey, participated in study and their departments are as follows: primary education, maths education, chemistry education and physics education. The data was collected by means of questionnaire developed by the researcher in the light of related literature in this descriptive type study. In the questionnaire, a total of 22 teaching strategies were covered. A 5-point Likert type instrument was used in the study. The views of the subjects on the effects of teaching strategies on the student’s motivation were identified at two levels: the importance of the strategies and frequency of the use of these strategies. In order to determine the effect of gender on the participants’ views, the t-test was used. Statistical procedures were achieved byusing SPSS.

Expected Outcomes

The main results can be summarised as follows: The participants regard “paying importance to communicate” as the most important strategy (Mean=4,74) and “use of different classroom arrangements” as the least important strategy (Mean=3.48). It is also revealed that the participants consider almost all the strategies to be very important. The prospective teachers have also reported that they will mostly use “the proper use of voice” strategy (Mean=4.65) and that they will infrequently use “different classroom arrangements” (Mean=2.98). This study aims at uncovering the views of the prospective teachers on the effects of effective teaching strategies on the students’ motivation. As stated by Linnenbrink and Pintrich (2003), the student’s motivation is important and should be considered by all teachers. Similarly, the views of the prospective teachers regarding the significance of efficient teaching strategies to increase the student motivation are also very crucial. In conclusion, motivation is essential if effective learning is to emerge. The study has revealed that effective teaching strategies offer teachers a diverse range of possibilities which can selected accordingly to the students response. Finally the literature indicates that there are many things still can be investigated about motivation in educational context which should be studied in future research.

References

Bouffard, T. & Couture, N. (2003). Motivational profile and academic achievement among students enrolled in different schooling tracks. Educational Studies, 29 (1), 19-38. Brophy, J. (1999). Toward a model of the value aspects of motivation in education: developing appreciation for particular learning domains and activities. Educational Psychologist, 34 (2), 75-85. (Retrieved from http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=76991928, 04.01. 2006. Hardre, P.L. ; Huang, S.H.; Chen, C.H.; Chiang, C.T.; Jenc, F.L. and Wardena, L. (2006). High school teachers’ motivational perceptions and strategies in an east Asian nation. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 34 (2), 199–221. Harlen, W. & Crick, R. D. (2003). Testing and motivation for learning. Assessment in Education,10 (2), 169-207. Kember, D. ; Ho, A. & Hong, C. (2008). The importance of establishing relevance in motivating student learning, Active Learning in Higher Education, 9; 249.(Online version of this article can be found at: http://alh.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/9/3/249) Linnenbrink, E.A. & Pintrich, P.R. (2003). The role of self-efficacy beliefs in student engagement and learning in the classroom. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19: 119-137. http://honolulu.hawaii.edu/intranet/committees/FacDevCom/guidebk/teachtip/motivate.htm (Retrieved: 10.10.2006) Martin L. Maehr and Heather A. Meyer (1997). Understanding motivation and schooling: where we've been, where we are, and where we need to go. Educational Psychology Review, 9(4), 371-409. Moore, K.D. (1998). Classroom Teaching Skills (Fourth Edition), Boston: McGraw Hill. Reece, I. & Walker, S. (1997). Teaching, Training and Learning (A Practical Guide)Business Education Publishers Limited, UK. Yükseltürk E.& Bulut, S. (2005). Relationships among self-regulated learning components, motivational beliefs and computer programming achievement in an online learning environment, Mediterranean Journal of Educational Studies, 10 (1), 91-112. Zoldosova, K. and Prokop, P. (2005). Analysis of motivational orientations in science education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education.

Author Information

Gazi University
Education Faculty
Ankara

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.