Session Information
02 SES 04 B, Curriculum, Pedagogy and Learning Resources (including E-Learning)
Paper Session
Contribution
Transfer taxonomy for teaching in the VET system
The purpose of the study is to test a taxonomy for teaching for transfer in the general subjects of the VET programmes
The taxonomy is based on the principle of identical elements(Thorndike & Woodworth, 1901) and on two pairs of concepts that derive from this principle. The one pair is specific/general transfer that concerns what is transferred, i.e. the contents of the teaching and learning, including the difference between instrumental and communicative learning.(Eraut, 1994; Aarkrog, 2006) The other pair is near/far transfer, which describes the contexts of transfer, i.e. the learning and the transfer situations (Ellis, 1965; Persson, 1995).
The taxonomy systematizes ways of differentiating the part of curriculum concerning teaching for transfer in order to meet the very heterogeneous group of students in Danish VET.
One of the greatest challenges in the dual VET system is to secure cohesion between the theoretical and practical parts of the programme. This includes teaching the students how to transfer the knowledge and skills into practice that they obtain in the school-based parts of the programme.
Practice related teaching has proved to only partly improving the students’ learning.(Aarkrog, 2008) The idea of the taxonomy is that the teacher can adjust the amount of identical elements between the learning and transfer situations in accordance with on the one hand the cognitive load that is demanded to learn the current theory and on the other hand the qualifications of the students.
The paper outlines the variables of the taxonomy, which is based on a taxonomy for higher education programmes (Barnett & Ceci, 2002) and adjusted to the VET programmes.
The taxonomy is put to the test in a number of courses in order to adjust the taxonomy to VET.
Method
Expected Outcomes
References
References Barnett, S. M., & Ceci, A. J. (2002). When and where do we apply what we learn? A taxonomy for far transfer. Psychological Bulletin, 128(4), 612-637. Ellis, H. C. (1965). The transfer of learning. New York: The Macmillan Company. Eraut, M. (1994). Developing professional knowledge and competence. London, Washington D.C.: The Falmer Press. Persson, J. (1995). Kontekstens betydning for transfer. Handelsskolen, København. Thorndike, E. L., & Woodworth, R. S. (1901). The influence of improvement in one mental function upon the efficiency of other functions. The Psychological Review, VIII(3), 247-261. Aarkrog, V. (2006). Apprentices’ transfer of knowledge from school to workplace in the vet dual system: A study of a vet-programme for rescue officers. In R. Daly & L. Mjelde (Eds.), Working knowledge in a globalizing world. From work to learning, from learning to work. (pp. 25-37). Bern: Peter Lang. Aarkrog, V. (2008). Convergence of general theory and practice in vet. Five theses about the students' motivation for general subjects in vet. In V. Aarkrog & C. H. Jørgensen (Eds.), Convergence and divergence in education and work. Bern: Peter Lang.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.