Partnerships for Learning Program: The Sociocultural Implications of Using Web 2.0 Video Based Webconferencing Technology for Learning
Conference:
ECER 2010
Format:
Paper

Session Information

16 SES 08 B, ICT and Social Aspects

Paper Session

Time:
2010-08-26
17:15-18:45
Room:
Juhlasali (315), Kielikeskus / Language Centre
Chair:
Ton Mooij

Contribution

Few would argue with Bourdieu’s (1998) observation that the large part of social suffering stems from the limitations of people’s relationships to the educational system – a system that not only shapes their social destinies but also the image they have of their destinies. The socio cultural contextual factors in learning spaces and the Discourses that dictate them has been of increasing interest in broad educational research, especially with regard to their impact on the social identities of learners and learning. With the introduction of computer technology to learning contexts over the last decade, a new or “third” (Lefebvre, 1991) learning space has opened up. New questions arise: What are the Discourses taking root in these spaces? What role can computer technology play in responding to the tensions that exist in traditional socio cultural learning spaces? What influence does the use of technology have on investment in learning and identity construction?

 

This paper presents the story of the Partnerships for Learning Program, an ongoing study that began in 2001 as a doctoral qualitative research project (Charbonneau-Gowdy 2009) with groups of multicultural military officers from Eastern and Central Europe studying in a NATO-sponsored language immersion program in Canada and in Europe. The tensions that existed in their learning was examined and responded to with the introduction of various ICT technologies both in the Canadian and European sites. A Participatory Action Research approach was used in the initial inquiry to explore with the participants their experiences using computers for communication and language learning. Evolving findings indicating disappointing implications of solely writing-based technologies led to the use of a video-based Web 2.0 conferencing tool for multiple site participants in Europe and Canada. The author draws on Vygotsky’s (1978) socio-cultural approach to learning, Bakhtin’s (1991)concept of learning as dialogic and Weedon’s (1997) notion of identity as dynamic, constructed, and contested through Discourses. The work of these three theorists helps to frame an understanding of the historical, political, cultural, pedagogical and personal influences on the original groups of participants as they negotiated their learning in a traditional and in the unique webconferencing setting.

 

In a further stage of the research, the web conferencing sessions have expanded to include groups of learners in a public service regional and inter-regional setting within Canada and internationally, between Canada and a military university in the Czech Republic. A second doctoral study that was undertaken in 2007 by the co-author of the present paper, questions from a quantitative perspective, whether there are differences in language learning outcomes for groups of learners at the military university in the Czech Republic. Pre and post test results of learners exposed to traditional, self-study ICT software and guided conversations in the video-based web conferencing sessions guided by a teacher in Canada were examined. The statistical results that emerged combined with the qualitative data in the Canadian public service context to indicate the power that these communication-based sessions supported by video-based web conferencing technology have on learning spaces both within and beyond the classroom.

 

Method

In the initial phase of the study, 2001 to 2004, qualitative research was conducted using ethnographic research methods. Data collection included observations of online interchanges, collaborative dialogic interviews and discourse analysis of participants’ written texts in the form of journals and e-mails. Other important data sources included videotapes and field notes taken at the Canadian site and during three field trips to the European sites. In a second phase in 2007 in the European site, primarily quantitative research methods were employed. Data from 3 self-selected groups were collected over 2 semesters. Results of pre-study and post-study tests were examined using standardized testing tools and evaluated with the statistics-based STUDENT TEST in EXCELL. In the third phase, in an 8-week Canadian government sponsored pilot study in 2008, data was collected through observations of online interchanges, video-taped collaborative dialogic interviews, participants’ entries in community sites, teacher journals and field notes.

Expected Outcomes

The evolving findings of this ongoing study have indicated that there is a great deal more to be learned from in-depth research into the sociocultural nature of computer mediated communication among learners including within formal learning contexts and beyond the classroom. The powerful potential that computers have to support increasingly more authentic forms of communicative interaction (Fang & Warschauer, 2004) through sound and visual images is worthy of more attention. The particular participants’ stories that have emerged in the research strongly suggest that the video-based web conferencing sessions not only supported their investment in learning and also their learning outcomes but, more importantly, enabled them to construct more powerful identities. In the context of language learning, these empowered identities have allowed many of the participants to move from marginalized positions in the global community to positions of strength where they can belong and be contributors to the global dialogue (Siemans, 2008). From these positions, learning takes on a new meaning. It is within these global dialogues, regardless of the language or nature of the subject matter that we continue to see hope for differences in groups to be celebrated and lines of tension between groups dissolved.

References

Bakhtin, M.M. (1981). The Dialogic Imagination. University of Texas Press: Austin, TX. Bourdieu, P. (1998). Acts of resistance: Against the new myths of our time. Cambridge, UK: Policy Press. Charbonneau-Gowdy, P. (2009). Speaking to Learn. Accessing Language, Identity and Power through Web Conferencing. Saarbrucken, Germany:Verlag Dr. Muller Fang.X & Warschauer, M. (2004). Technology and curricular reform in China: A Case Study. TESOL Quarterly, 38(2). 301-323. Lefebvre, H (1991) The production of space (D. Nicholson-Smith, trans.). Blackwell, Cambridge, England. Siemens, G. (2008) Interview of keynote speaker at the eLearning Africa 2008 Conference. eLearning Africa online Newsportal, www.elearning-africa.com/press_release_2008.php Vygotsky, L.S. (1978) Mind in Society: The development of higher psychological processes. M.Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (Eds.), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. Weedon, C. (1997). Feminist practice and poststructuralist theory. London: Blackwell.

Author Information

Government of Canada
Canada School of Public Service
Montreal
University of Defence
Brno

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.