Students' Approaches to Homework
Author(s):
Conference:
ECER 2010
Format:
Paper

Session Information

27 SES 02 B, Individualized Learning

Paper Session

Time:
2010-08-25
11:15-12:45
Room:
M.B. SALI 12, Päärakennus / Main Building
Chair:
Meinert Arnd Meyer

Contribution

Homework is a well-known part of the teaching and learning process in schools. The use of homework has fluctuated over the years, although there seems to be  an emphasis on the importance of homework in times of economic decline (Cooper, 1989; SOU1993:16). The use and significance of homework is often taken for granted in ordinary school work (Hellsten, 1997), but homework includes several  dimensions, for example repetition of a specific content, preparation for something new, fostering of self-discipline and good study habits, working with individual study assignments for a period of time. There is a body of research on homework and several overviews and meta-studies have been conducted (e.g. Cooper, 1989, 2007; Hallam, 2004; Hellsten, 1997).

 

Walberg and Paschal (1994) notes that the term is used in educational research with varying definitions. Research on homework has often been focused on effects, but at the same time has been criticised for presenting effects when the research design only allows for correlations. Kåräng (1996) claims that there is no clear connection between the amount of homework and study results, but reports a positive correlation between well-educated parents and good grades (above average). Hadwin et al. (2004) describes how self regulated learning depends on ability, motivation and self-discipline. To be successful, all aspects must either be in place, or be cultivated.

 

Christensen (2005) emphasises that schools often takes for granted that parental support is always available, which is not the case. Högdin (2007) found, in a large study based on questionnaires to students in grade 7–9, that parental support is important for boys’ involvement in school work, while girls’ involvement is primarily dependent on support from their teachers. The conclusion is that for boys parental support is most effective, but if needed it can be replaced by teacher support. For girls, on the other hand, support from the teacher is crucial and it cannot be replaced by support from parents.

 

How can homework be described from students’ point of view? What is the relation between students’ approaches to homework and study success? How does the students’ approach to homework and study results in terms of grades interplay with their social background?

 

 

Method

The main empirical study, that will be presented here, is based on interviews with 40 students (age 13-16) in Swedish Compulsory School (grade 7-9). The interview questions concerned how the students perceive and handle their homework, which meaning and purpose they ascribe to it, and if they have any suggestions about how to improve the practice of homework. The interviews were transcribed and analysed within a phenomenographic framework (cf. Marton, 1981, 1986, 1994; Österlind, 1998). As part of a follow-up study with the same students (Österlind, 2009), during their last semester of upper secondary school (age 18-19), data about social background was collected and completed with information about the students’ final grades.

Expected Outcomes

The analysis resulted in five qualitatively different approaches to homework, the a) deliberative, b) achievement oriented, c) voluntarily, d) un-reflected and e) ambivalent approach (Österlind, 2001), which will be described. Some suggestions for improvement are also mentioned. Data from the follow-up study will be used to complete the results from the previous study, in order to explore the relationship between approach to homework (choice of study programme), final grades and social background. It might be valuable not only to know that there are substantial differences in how students’ conceptualize and handle their homework, but also to know more about those differences and their consequences, and thereby hopefully be able to adjust the tasks and the tutoring according to the student’s approach. The result should also shred some light on the (eventual) implications of having established a positive approach to homework in earlier school years.

References

Christensen, G. (2005). Individualiseringens pædagogik. Nordiske udkast, (1), 3–18. Cooper, H. (1989). Synthesis of Research on Homework. Educational Leadership, 47(3), 85–91. Cooper, H. M. (2007). The battle over homework. Common ground for administrators, teachers, and parents. CA: Thousand Oaks. Hallam, S. (2004). Homework: The evidence. London: Institute of Education, University of London. Hadwin, A. F., Boutara, L., Knoetzke, T. & Thompson, S. (2004). Cross-case study of self-regulated learning as a series of events. Educational Research and Evaluation 10(4-6), 365–417. Hellsten, J.-O. (1997). Läxor är inget att orda om. Pedagogisk forskning i Sverige, 2(3), 205–220. Högdin, S. (2007). Studieengagemang i grundskolan: Betydelsen av kön, etnicitet och lärarstöd. Nordisk pedagogik (3), 291–311. Kåräng, G. (1996). Skolfaktorer och studieresultat. Nordisk pedagogik, 16(1), 42–52. Marton, F. (1981). Phenomenography – describing conceptions of the world around us. Instructional Science, 10, 177–200. Marton, F. (1986). Phenomenography – A research approach to investigating different understandings of reality. Journal of Thought, 21(3), 28–49. Marton, F. (1994). Phenomenography. In T. Husén & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds). The International Encyclopedia of Education (second ed.), vol. 8, pp. 4424–4429. Oxford: Pergamon Press. SOU 1993:16. Nya villkor for ekonomi och politik. Finansdepartementet. Stockholm: Allmänna förlaget. Walberg, H. J. & Paschal, R. A. (1994). Homework. In T. Husén & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Education (p. 2628–2631), 2:nd edition. Oxford: Pergamon Press. Österlind, E. (1998). Disciplinering via frihet. Elevers planering av sitt eget arbete. (Diss.) Uppsala Studies in Education 75, Uppsala universitet, Uppsala. Österlind, E. (2001). Elevers förhållningssätt till läxor. En uppföljningsstudie. Rapport 2001:1, Högskolan Dalarna, Falun. Österlind, E. [2009]. Students’ Approaches to Project Work. Self-Regulated Learning in Swedish Upper Secondary School. US-China Education Review (in press).

Author Information

Stockholm University
Aesthetics and Learning
Garpenberg

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.