Changing teaching practices in changing universities. Evidences from a life histories research
Conference:
ECER 2010
Format:
Paper

Session Information

22 SES 06 C, Academic Work and Professional Development

Paper Session

Time:
2010-08-26
10:30-12:00
Room:
M.B. SALI 16, Päärakennus / Main Building
Chair:
Jussi Välimaa

Contribution

In the last few years, Higher Education institutions have undergone profound and fundamental changes that have strongly affected perceptions about the very mission of these organisations, the characteristics of the activities they develop, and the results obtained by those working in them. This new scenario is deeply affecting scholars’ professional identity, in addition to their working life and working conditions

Different studies have pointed out a set of changing elements that constitute the new social weave, to which the University also actively contributes. Among them we find: (a) The systems of production, access, disclosure and recognition of knowledge in the post-industrial societies (Lyotard, 1984; Gibbons, et al, 1995). (b) The digitization of information that shifts attention from purposes, values and ideals to "the media and techniques to obtain efficient [optimum] results" (Marshall, 1998:9). (c) The combination of new economical perspectives with the "explosion" of information and communication technologies that are favouring the apparition of new forms of organization for higher education (Hanna and associates, 2000). (d) The generalization of the use of the digital information and communication technologies that enable and demand new ways of teaching and learning, selection, appraisal and interpretation of the information and, therefore, of assessing the process and the results of the learning (Hanna and associates 2000¸ Jochems and others 2004). (f) The characteristics, needs and expectations of new generations of students who are digital natives in front of their analogical (digital immigrant) teachers. (g) The full incorporation of women to a space traditionally reserved for the men (Morley and Walsh, 1996). (h) In Europe, the construction of the European Space for Higher Education (Bologna Declaration). All these changes are putting considerable pressure on higher education institutions and their personnel (Garrison and Anderson, 2003; McIntosh, 2005, Metcalfe, 2006).

However, most studies have been carried out from a structural perspective in which scholars’ views about their working conditions, expectations, and worries are collected through statistic-based questionnaires or not taken into account at all.  This is the reason underpinning the research project this paper builds on: The Impact of Social Change in Higher Education Staff Professional Life and Work. (Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación. SEJ2006-01876. 2006-2009), whose main aim is to explore and understand how scholars establish a dialog, resist, adapt themselves or adopt changes and construct their professional identities.  The focus of this presentation is the change and the continuity found in the teaching practice of 24 scholars throughout their professional career.

Method

Life histories methodology was the approach we took to study academics’ experiences of change over time. Life histories allow for connecting the personal accounts of university teachers with their biography and the wider socio-cultural and historical context, thus arriving at what can be called their professional habitus (Bourdieu 1977; 1994). By using a life history methodology, our research aimed at capturing the changing professional worlds of higher education faculties, focusing especially on their academic careers and professional experiences, building from their own biographical accounts. We have worked with 24 university teachers with more than 20 years of service and belonging to historical (7) and new universities (9). Participants were selected by gender (12 men and 12 women) and academic speciality (12 from Experimental Sciences and Technology and 12 from Social Sciences and Humanities).

Expected Outcomes

The 24 professional life histories (Ardra and Knowles, 2001; Goodson & Numan, 2003) elaborated in this project allowed us to draw a complex picture of the change and continuity higher education teachers have experienced throughout their career in relation to their teaching practices. Practically all of these professionals, each with more than 20 years of service, pointed out the following aspects as being the most relevant to understand the emerging challenges they are facing in their teaching duties: (a) The fact they have learnt to teach through experience, due to the lack of any kind of initial, and also quite inadequate, in-service professional development. (b) The changing composition and characteristics of the students they have to teach. Now-a-day students’ needs, expectations and predispositions have changed considerably over the years. (c) The change in institutional relations due to the implementation of accountability schemes. (d) The pressure and ubiquity of digital technologies that dramatically change the notion of knowledge itself, the teachers’ role, and the teacher-student relationship. (e) The urge for developing innovative approaches to teaching.

References

Bourdieu, Pierre (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge; New York : Cambridge University Press. Bourdieu, P. (1994). Raisons pratiques. Sur la théorie de l’action. París: Seuil. Cole, Ardra L. and Knowles, J. Gary (2001). Lives in context : the art of life history research. Walnut Creek, CA : AltaMira Press. Goodson, I. & Numan, U. (2003). Life History and Professional Development: Stories of Teachers’ Life and Work. Lund: Studentlitteratur. Jochems, W., van Merriënboer, J. and Koper, R. (Ed.) (2004). Integrated e-learning: implications for pedagogy, technology and organization. NewYork: RoutledgeFalmer. Lyotard, Jean François (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Minneapolis. University of Minnesota Press. Marshall, 1998:9). Donald E. Hanna and Associates (2000). Higher Education in an Era of Digital Competition: Choices and challenges. Madison, WI.: Atwood Publishing. McIntosh, C. (2005). Lifelong Learning and Distance Higher Education Overview. París: UNESCO. Metcalfe, Amy (Eds.) (2006). Knowledge management and higher education a critical analysis. London: Information Science Pub Gibbons, Michael; Limoges, Camille; Nowotny, Helga ; Schwartzman, Simon; Scott, Peter and Trow, Martin (1994). The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London: Sage. Morley, L. y Walsh, V. (eds.) (1996) Breaking Boundaries: Women in Higher Education. Londres: Taylor and Francis. Garrison, D R and Anderson, Terry (2003). E-Learning in the 21st Century: a framework for research and practice. London: RoutledgeFalmer.

Author Information

University of Barcelona
CECACE
Barcelona
Universitat of Chile and Universitat of Barcelona
de Education
Barcelona
University of Barcelona, Spain

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.