In the last 10-15 years, higher education has experienced significant shifts in how academic work is organised, recognised, and valued (Whitchurch, 2013). Alongside traditional roles centred on teaching, research, and institutional service, an increasing proportion of academic labour now takes place at the edges of the university: through consultancy, fixed-term or project-based roles, sector bodies, academic development work, and institution-building initiatives that does not always sit comfortably within conventional academic categories. Despite the prevalence of such work, higher education research has yet to develop adequate conceptual language for understanding academic work that is institutionally decoupled. This paper argues that significant forms of contemporary academic contribution are design-oriented, relational, and structurally influential, yet remain conceptually under-recognised in higher education research.

This paper explores how academic contribution and identity are understood and negotiated when academic work occurs partially or wholly outside institutionally anchored roles. It responds to a growing but under-theorised phenomenon in European higher education: experienced academics continuing to contribute meaningfully to the sector while operating at its periphery, often without formal recognition as “research-active” or “teaching-active” staff.

The paper is guided by the following questions: 

• How is academic contribution currently conceptualised and recognised within higher education?
• Which forms of academic work become less visible or less valued when contribution is narrowly defined through teaching loads, grant income, or research outputs?
• How might we reconceptualise academic contribution to better account for design, advisory, and connective forms of work that increasingly shape contemporary higher education?

The paper draws on literature concerned with academic identity, professional practice, and changing forms of academic labour, alongside work on programme design, assessment, and sustainability in higher education. It argues that a greater proportion of contemporary academic work than is commonly recognised is architectural, that is, concerned with shaping structures, frameworks, curricula, and conditions for learning, rather than delivering visible outputs. Such work is typically future-oriented, relational, and distributed across institutional and national boundaries, making it difficult to capture or measure. 

The paper also engages with the idea of the university as an increasingly porous and networked space, where academic influence and expertise circulate across institutions, sector bodies, and international contexts. From a European perspective, this raises questions about how higher education systems recognise expertise, support academic careers, and sustain scholarly communities in conditions of uncertainty, precarity, and change.

Rather than positioning work at the edges of the university as a deficit or a transitional phase, it is proposed that such positions offer distinctive vantage points from which to reflect on academic values, institutional priorities, and the purposes of higher education. In doing so, it aligns with broader debates within European educational research concerning academic wellbeing, sustainability, and the future of academic work.

The objective of the paper is not to offer a universal model of academic contribution, but to surface tensions, patterns, and questions that can inform ongoing discussion within the higher education research community. By making visible forms of academic work that are often overlooked, the paper seeks to contribute to more inclusive and realistic understandings of what it means to ‘contribute’ academically in contemporary higher education at a time of tension, scrutiny, and uncertainty. 

This paper adopts a conceptual–reflective approach, drawing on three interconnected sources. First, it undertakes a selective, small-scale review of literature on academic identity, academic labour, and professional practice in higher education. This includes work on changing academic roles, programme leadership and design, assessment and curriculum development, and the implications of precarity and uncertainty for academic careers. Particular attention is paid to European and international contributions that problematise narrow definitions of academic work and call for more holistic understandings of contribution. Second, the paper is informed by reflective analysis of the author’s professional experience across multiple higher education contexts, including universities, sector bodies, and consultancy-based academic work. The author writes from a position of long-term involvement in higher education academic development and institutional design. Reflection is used here not as autobiography, but as a structured analytic tool (Moon, 2005), enabling the identification of recurring patterns and insights arising from work conducted at the boundaries of institutional life. This stance is theorised and positioned as a legitimate source of knowledge within higher education research. The reflective analysis is cumulative and longitudinal rather than episodic, drawing on patterns observed across multiple roles and systems rather than on singular experiences. Third, the paper draws on secondary sources such as policy documents, sector guidance, and professional frameworks relating to assessment, sustainability, and academic development. These sources are used to situate individual experiences within wider structural and policy contexts, and to support claims about the shifting nature of academic contribution across higher education systems. This is not an empirical study. Instead, it synthesises conceptual literature, reflective analysis, and policy-oriented sources to offer a theoretically grounded discussion of academic work at the edges of the university. This approach aligns with established traditions of conceptual and reflective scholarship in higher education research, where professional practice is treated as a legitimate site of knowledge production.

The paper argues that prevailing conceptions of academic contribution are misaligned with the realities of contemporary higher education work. When contribution is defined narrowly through research outputs, teaching hours, or institutional affiliation, significant forms of academic work — particularly design, advisory, and connective work — risk becoming invisible. By foregrounding academic work at the edges of the university, the paper highlights the need to rethink how expertise, contribution, and identity are understood and valued. It suggests that such edge positions can offer productive spaces for reflection, innovation, and cross-institutional learning, particularly in times of change. Expected outcomes include: • A clearer articulation of the forms of academic work that are currently under-recognised within higher education. • A conceptual reframing of academic contribution that accounts for design-oriented and relational practices. • Implications for how institutions, networks, and professional communities might better support diverse academic trajectories. The paper ultimately invites reconsideration of how higher education research itself recognises knowledge generated through academic design and sector-facing work.

Barnett, R. (2011). Being a University. London: Routledge. Baughan, P. (2015). Sustainability policy and sustainability in higher education curricula. International Journal for Academic Development, 20(3), 233–245. Brew, A. (2010). Imperatives and challenges in integrating teaching and research. Higher Education Research & Development, 29(2), 139–150. McArthur, J. (2023). Rethinking Authentic Assessment: Work, Wellbeing and Society. Cham: Springer. Moon, J. A. (2005). Reflection in Learning and Professional Development: Theory and Practice. London: RoutledgeFalmer. Tight, M. (2012). Academic Work and Life: What It Is to Be an Academic, and How This Is Changing. Bingley: Emerald. UNESCO (2017). Education for Sustainable Development Goals: Learning Objectives. Paris: UNESCO. Whitchurch, C. (2008). Shifting identities and blurring boundaries: The emergence of third space professionals in UK higher education. Higher Education Quarterly, 62(4), 377–396. Whitchurch, C. (2013). Reconstructing Identities in Higher Education: The Rise of “Third Space” Professionals. London: Routledge.