The concept of the ‘expert teacher’ is an international phenomenon with many advanced systems investing in a formal designation, partly explained by education systems profound need to recruit and retain the best teachers, providing a career structure, maintaining their classroom impact and developing other teachers in the system. This research closely examines the purposes and structures of these evolving models in each national context, especially the history of their impact on teachers’ professional status and significance for the future, it traces global influences and the challenges of governance and political control of such designations.  It provides an innovative, international typology, categorising and analysing the phenomenon of the models

The concept of the ‘expert teacher’ has a significant history, developing into an increasingly global phenomenon [Goodwyn, 2024]. The USA can celebrate having the longest running and only consistent, model, The Highly Accomplished Teacher, developed in the 1970s, it has an exemplary history. The international nature of the phenomenon is partly explained by the need systems have to recruit and retain the best teachers [Burge, P, Lu, H and Phillips, W., 2021], and to provide them with a meaningful and high status career structure. Such a structure maintains their impact in the classroom and, in some designations, on the development of other teachers in the system, often helping to repair the quality of struggling teachers. {Goodwyn. 2022,2024]

There are many notable examples of the phenomenon, from around the world, with the Advanced Skills Teacher [AST] in Australia [over 30 years] [Ingvarson LC, 1998, 2009, 2013 & 2014) and The Highly Accomplished Teacher [HAT]in the USA [28 years] [Gitomer DH 2007 & 2008] being the most established.  However, some models have disappeared – the AST in England 1997-2013, the Chartered Teacher in Scotland only lasted 7 years [McCormac Review 2011].  There are new developments, the Chartered teacher in England and the Highly Accomplished Teacher in Australia, now 6 years in development [Goodwyn, 2024].  Singapore is evolving an elaborate structure of Leading and Master teachers with several career pathways.

This research examines the history of the purposes and structures of these evolving models and their successes and challenges in each national context.  It traces global influences, for example the adoption of the HAT designation in Australia, being adapted from the USA, the Chartered model beginning in England just as it is abolished in Scotland [Author, 2024].  These changes are part of the challenge of governance and political control of such designations and their relative stability or fragility.  The overall findings are synthesised in a typology, which categorises the models and provides an analytical framework.

Ontologically, the research adopts a critical realist perspective [Sayer, 1992, 2012, Archer et al 1998] examining the history of the expert teacher concept as fundamentally concerned with structural, systemic improvement, a potentially emancipatory and future oriented project for the agentive teaching profession in each system that can challenge racial inequalities.  Epistemologically it adopts a phenomenological stance towards ‘expert teaching’ as a designation, drawing on the emergent field of expertise studies [Dreyfus & Dreyfus, 1998, Ericsson et al, 2012]. It is notable that there are always relatively newer models, for example ‘The Extended Teacher’ from Norway, ‘The Chartered Teacher’ in England, the Expert Teacher Network in Chile and the Korean ‘Master Teacher’, all of which show influence from previous models in other jurisdictions and demonstrate global trends and local adaptations. 

The research provides close analysis of the features of each model, its evolution and development and its status in relation to five factors:- [1] status within the profession on a strong/weak continuum, [2] its governance and political status on a continuum of stability/fragility [3] its effectiveness on a continuum of powerful to weak [4] the success of its mission [where relevant] to challenging racial inequalities and social injustice [5] its potential for future impact. On this basis a typology is provided to both capture and analyse the phenomenon. The research involved a systematic review of the literature, close textual analysis of the web sites, documents, and policy statements of each model over the last 10 years [in some cases 30 years]; scrutiny [where relevant] of government web sites statements and policies; empirical research over 40 years, both surveys and interviews, with participants of the models in the USA, UK, Norway, Singapore and Australia. This complex pattern of research is synthesised in the characteristics’ table below. This theoretical framework of ‘levels’ helps understanding of how the history of the models is increasingly complex and sophisticated, depending on purpose and scope. In practical terms they are no more than useful and approximate, in CR terms they are practically adequate. The distinctions at levels Two and Three in practice are not sharp and clear. This is an important point in relation to the future of the global trend to adapt from one national model to another as it allows for a consideration of how purpose/s in developing a new model or refining an existing one, may be evaluated for their sufficiency and/or limitations. The analysis leads to the next consideration which is outlined here as a recognition of levels. This is a speculative analysis, put forward as an interpretive tool with which to examine the characteristics of different models and consider the future. The Levels outline the implicit structure in each and its relation to teacher agency. There is not space for a detailed analysis as all the models at Levels 2 and 3, have highly elaborated descriptors and accompanying documents The levels also raise an interesting question about career structures and intrinsic rewards. It is inescapable that all the models use some resource to operate; that is there is a cost in undertaking the process to achieve the recognition and the recognising body must have resources.

The levels can be categorised:- Characteristics of models of expert teaching Level one Level two Level three • Recognition only • Retention in the classroom • ‘One off’ salary Increase? • Limited assessment criteria, essentially recommendation • Normal ethical dimension • Any experienced teacher • No sharing of expertise • No status for the profession • Recognition [no given responsibilities] • Retention in the classroom • Potential salary increase over time? • Demanding assessment criteria with independent input. • Robustly developed standards/descriptors • Career enhancing [not guaranteed] • Increased ethical dimension • Only some experienced teachers with exemplary status • Potential sharing of expertise • Some status for the profession, some public recognition • Designation [has given responsibilities] • Retention in the classroom • Definite salary increase • Highly demanding assessment criteria with independent input • Robustly developed standards/descriptors • Career structure • Increased ethical dimension • Only a minority of experienced teachers who are also exemplary professionals • Requirement to share expertise • Some status for the profession, some public recognition, some comparability with other professions The expert teacher phenomenon is globally well established and has sufficient history of its significance and potential to be influencing developments in other systems. This intense level of development allows for international comparisons that examine valuable similarities and important local differences, providing evidence of a range of successful models. An important element of difference is to do with structures of control and governance, is the model ‘owned’ by the profession, or by the government, or by an independent body. It may provide an especially important career route for teachers from minority backgrounds. Such teachers can act as advocates for a strong profession with its own voice and professional standards and where teacher autonomy can be a structural part of the designation and can play a special role in challenging inequalities. The history of the expert teacher concept has much to offer how we imagine the future of the teaching profession.

Archer, M., Bhaskar, R., Collier, A., Lawson, T. & Norrie, A. (1998). (Eds.) Critical Realism: Essential Readings. London, Routledge. Berliner.D.C., [2001] ‘Learning about and learning from expert teachers’, International Journal of Educational Research, Vol 5, No 5, 463-482 Burge, P, Lu, H and Phillips, W. [2021] Understanding Teacher Retention Using a discrete choice experiment to measure teacher retention in England, London, DfE Dreyfus, H.L. and Dreyfus, S.E. [1988] Mind Over Machine: The Power of Human Intuition and Expertise in the Era of the Computer, New York, The Free Press. Ericsson, K.A., Charness, N., Feltovich, P.J. and Hoffman, R.R. [2006] The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Francis-Brophy, E [2016] ‘An Australian View: From Advanced Skills Teacher to national standard, in Author, Expert Teachers: an International perspective, London, Routledge. (pp. 91-107) Gitomer DH (2007) The impact of the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards: A review of the research. Princeto n, NJ: Educational Testing Service. Goodwyn. (2010). The Expert Teacher of English. London, Routledge. Goodwyn. (2016). Expert Teachers: an International Perspective. London, Routledge. Goodwyn. [2024] ‘Reflecting on the identity of the teaching profession: time for some higher status?’ In Reflections on Identity – Narratives from Educators. In Neil Hopkins & Carol Thompson, (Eds)London. Springer. Goodwyn. [2024] The increasingly global phenomenon of the expert teacher designation: a critical realist perspective and analysis, in Global Perspectives on Educational Research, WERA Volume 5. Routledge, London. Ingvarson LC (2014) ‘Standards-based professional learning and certification: By the profession, for the profession’. In Martin L (ed) The Handbook of Professional Development in Education, Successful Models and Practices, PreK-12. New York: Guilford Publishing. Ingvarson LC and Hattie J (eds) (2008) Assessing Teachers for Professional Certification: The First Decade of the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards (Volume 11, Advances in Program Evaluation). Amsterdam: Elsevier Press. NBPTS (2007) A Research Guide on National Board Certification of Teachers. Arlington, VA: NBPTS. OECD (2011) Building a high-quality teaching profession: Lessons from around the world, background report for the International Summit on the Teaching Profession. Paris, France: OECD Publishing. Salvador SK and Baxter A (2010) National Board certification. Impact on teacher effectiveness. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools, Center for Research and Evaluation, Office of Accountability. Sayer, A. (1992) Method in Social Science: a Realist Approach. London, Routledge Sayer, A. (2000) Realism and Social Science. London, Sage. Woon Chia, Liu [2022] Singapore’s Approach to Developing Teachers, London, Routledge