Session Information
07 SES 03 A, Social Justice: Generational Analysis
Paper Session
Contribution
The family is viewed as the lynchpin of society, and its structure is fiercely guarded by its members. Education is one of the significant elements that bring about changes to future generations in a family. Research in Britain over the last two decades (Mirza, 1992; Tomlinson, 1993; Basit, 1997; Bhatti, 1999; Crozier, 2000; McNamara et al., 2000; Abbas, 2004; Pring et al., 2009) has examined parental involvement and support regarding the education of the next generation amongst families from a range of social backgrounds and ethnic origins. Bourdieu (1999) points to the importance of social, cultural, linguistic and symbolic capital – the attributes that make a person’s place of birth and place of residence so important. These attributes have particular relevance in case of young people living in a country other than that of their family’s country of origin. Coleman (1994) considers social capital mainly as a way of understanding the relationship between social inequality and educational achievement. Putnam (2000) too, links social capital with positive outcomes in education. While there are certain differences in the theses of these theorists, social and cultural capitals, as discussed by them, though not overtly evident, are inherent in the structure of many ethnic minority families in the developed world.
Method
Expected Outcomes
References
Abbas, T. (2004) The Education of British South Asians: Ethnicity, Capital and Class Structure (Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan). Basit, T. N. (1997) Eastern Values, Western Milieu: Identities and Aspirations of Adolescent British Muslim Girls. Aldershot: Ashgate. Bhatti, G. (1999) Asian Children at Home and at School. London: Routledge. Bourdieu, P. (1999) ‘Site Effects’, in P. Bourdieu et al. The Weight of the World: Social Suffering in Contemporary Society. Cambridge: Polity. (Translated by P.P. Ferguson et al.) Coleman, J. S. (1994) Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press. Crozier, G. (2000) Parents and Schools: Partners or Protagonists. Stoke on Trent: Trentham. McNamara, O.; Hustler, D.; Stronach, I.; Rodrigo, M.; Beresford, E.; & Botcherby, S. (2000) ‘Room to manoeuvre: Mobilising the active partner in home-school relations’. British Educational Research Journal, 26, pp. 473-89. Mirza, H. S. (1992) Young Female and Black. London: Routledge. Pring, R.; Hayward, G.; Hodgson, A.; Johnson, J.; Keep, E.; Oancea, A.; Rees, G.; Spours, K.; and Wilde, S. (2009) Education for All: The Future of Education and Training for 14-19 year Olds. London: Routledge. Putnam, R.D. (2000) Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster. Tomlinson, S. (1993) Ethnic Minorities: Involved partners or problem parents? In P. Munn (ed.) Parents and Schools: Customers, Managers or Partners. London: Routledge.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.