23 SES 03 C, Curriculum Policy
Parallel Paper Session
In Western liberal democracies, much has been written about the rise of utilitarian rationalisations of curriculum, particularly in reforms from the 1980s onwards (Marginson 1997; Goodson 1997; Young 2008; Wheelahan 2010). This research suggests education is increasingly framed in economic terms and knowledge is judged for its utility in changing labour markets. In many OECD countries, this trend has been expressed through an increased focus on employability skills, competencies and qualifications, with curriculum reforms animated by a desire for secondary education to competitively position young people in the ‘global knowledge economy’ (Skilbeck et al. 1994; Yates 2011).
At the same time, a distinct field of research has investigated changing forms of governance associated with global and economic reforms in education (Ball 2007; Rizvi & Lingard 2010; Savage 2011). This research suggests the role of ‘the state’ is shifting, with an increased reliance upon non-government agencies to support government objectives. Ball and Exley (2010) argue that we are entering a new phase of ‘polycentric governance’, in which policy is produced through multiple and intersecting networks of state and non-state actors. In Australia and the UK in particular, an emerging trend in polycentric governance is ‘school-industry partnerships’, whereby education providers join with industry to achieve specific governmental aims (Kapitzke & Hay 2010).
Despite a proliferation of research in these two fields, very little research has drawn theoretical links between them. What relationships exist, therefore, between rising utilitarian rationalisations of curriculum and evolving forms of polycentric governance? This absence of research is significant, given forms of polycentric governance are increasingly promoted by curriculum agencies in the development of curriculum. In Australia, for example, the Department of Education and Training, in the state of Queensland, has developed a ‘Gateway to Industry Schools Program’, which links schools with prominent industry partners to develop academic and vocational pathways tailored to the needs of priority industries. The project has developed schools such as ‘Aviation High’ in Brisbane, which has designed an aerospace-targeted curriculum, written in association with the Boeing corporation. School-industry partnerships are also being actively encouraged in the state of Victoria, where the Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority is piloting industry-themed programs which partner schools and corporations to develop curricula in industry areas with identified skills shortages.
In this paper, I present findings from a postdoctoral research project that explores the role of school-industry partnerships in the production of curriculum knowledge. Combining policy analysis and interviews with school managers and policy actors in the Australian states of Queensland and Victoria, I explore the emergence of school-industry partnerships as solutions to problems of curriculum governance and how these new forms of governance are changing the conditions under which curriculum knowledge is being produced.
Ball, S. (2007). Education plc: understanding private sector participation in public sector. London: Routledge. Ball, S., Exley, S. (2010). Making Policy with ‘Good Ideas’: the ‘Intellectuals’ of New Labour. Journal of Education Policy, 25(2), 151-169. Goodson, I. (1997). The changing curriculum: studies in social construction. New York: Peter Lang. Kapitzke, C. and Hay, S. (2010), School Education as Social and Economic Governance: Responsibilising communities through industry-school engagement. Educational Philosophy and Theory. Doi: 10.1111/j.1469-5812.2010.00679.x Marginson, S. (1997). Markets in Education. St Leonards: Allen & Unwin. Rizvi, F., and B. Lingard. (2010). Globalizing Education Policy. New York: Routledge. Savage, G. C. (2011). When worlds collide: Excellent and equitable learning communities? Australia's ‘social capitalist’ paradox? Journal of Education Policy, 26(1), 33-59. Skilbeck, M., Connell, H., Lowe, N. and Tait, K. (1994). The Vocational Quest: New Directions in Education and Training. New York: Routledge. Wheelahan, L. (2010). Why Knowledge Matters in Curriculum: a Social Realist Argument. London: Routledge. Yates, L. (2011). Re-thinking knowledge; re-thinking work. In Yates, L., Collins, C. & O’Connor, K (Eds). Australia’s Curriculum Dilemmas. Melbourne University Press: Melbourne. Young, M. F. (2008). Bringing knowledge back in: from social constructivism to social realism in the sociology of education. London: Routledge.
Some networks have already started to plan their chairperson(s).
But at the moment chairpersons are only pencilled in, as we will still need to check for time conflicts between presentation and chairing duties. EERA office will work on this in due course and then officially let chairpersons know about their chairing duties.
Meanwhile, thank you for your patience.
00. Central Events (Keynotes, EERA-Panel, EERJ Round Table, Invited Sessions)
Network 1. Continuing Professional Development: Learning for Individuals, Leaders, and Organisations
Network 2. Vocational Education and Training (VETNET)
Network 3. Curriculum Innovation
Network 4. Inclusive Education
Network 5. Children and Youth at Risk and Urban Education
Network 6. Open Learning: Media, Environments and Cultures
Network 7. Social Justice and Intercultural Education
Network 8. Research on Health Education
Network 9. Assessment, Evaluation, Testing and Measurement
Network 10. Teacher Education Research
Network 11. Educational Effectiveness and Quality Assurance
Network 12. LISnet - Library and Information Science Network
Network 13. Philosophy of Education
Network 14. Communities, Families and Schooling in Educational Research
Network 15. Research Partnerships in Education
Network 16. ICT in Education and Training
Network 17. Histories of Education
Network 18. Research in Sport Pedagogy
Network 19. Ethnography
Network 20. Research in Innovative Intercultural Learning Environments
Network 22. Research in Higher Education
Network 23. Policy Studies and Politics of Education
Network 24. Mathematics Education Research
Network 25. Research on Children's Rights in Education
Network 26. Educational Leadership
Network 27. Didactics – Learning and Teaching
The programme is updated regularly (each day in the morning)
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.