The Need of Linking Learning In and Out School
Conference:
ECER 2012
Format:
Paper

Session Information

06 SES 10, Learning With Digital Media In and Out Of School

Parallel Paper Session
Chair: Yvonne Fritze

Time:
2012-09-20
15:30-17:00
Room:
FCT - Aula 2
Chair:
Yvonne Fritze

Contribution

In the last few years our research group (Contemporary Subjectivities and Educational Environments –ESBRINA) has carried out two research projects: 1) “Policy and Practice regarding ICT in Education: Implication for Educational Innovation and Improvement” (MICINN. SEJ2007-67562); 2) “Rethinking school success and failure of secondary education from the relationship of young people with knowledge” (MICINN. EDU2008-03287), that allowed us to explore fundamental educational issues such as: a) how schools meet (or not) the challenge of educating students in the digital society; b) how school use Information and Communication Technologies to enhance students learning; c) how students give meaning (or not) to their school experience.

However, the most significant matter arising from these two projects has been the existing gap between the “real” world and the school world; between students’ social and personal experiences out school, and students’ learning practices in school.

Now-a-days students are living in settings literally bombarded by aural, visual and sensorial stimuli providing them with very distinctive life and learning experiences, which are often neglected or rejected by the unchanging structures and orientations of schools (Sancho, 2009). The so-called Web2.0 seems perfect for expressing the “self” as a second generation of web-based communities and hosted services —such as social networking sites, wikis, folksonomies, weblogs (blogs), social bookmarking, podcasts, RSS feeds, and so on— aim to facilitate authorship, creativity, collaboration and sharing between users and effective information handling. An environment ideally suited for multiliterate users (Cope & Kalanski, 2000). Young people’s recurrent activity with these technologies fundamentally shapes their notions of communication, knowledge management, learning, and even personal and social values (Oblinger & Oblinger, 2005; Howe & Strauss, 2000).

These situations raise a set of questions such us: To what extent are schools taking into account that learning does not only take place in the classroom? To what extent is it considered that learning, for better or worse, takes place in all formal and informal environments in which people happen to be involved, at any point in life? To what extent students learning experiences out of school are “interfering” school learning and results and foster students lack of engagement in processes meaningless for them?

In order to find new answers to these questions we have set up a new project (“Living and learning with new literacies inside and outside the secondary school: contributions to reduce truancy, exclusion and young students’ disaffection”. MICINN- EDU2011-24122) to explore the following hypothesis: There is a gap between what the school believes that learning is (in general, listening to the teacher, making exercises and accounting for a reproductive test or exam) and how young people learn outside school when they build digital trading communities with colleagues and use new literacies.


Our presentation will focus on the decision made to set up the proposal and undertaking the first research steps, putting a special attention to the setting up of the ethnographical studies to explore “with” secondary school students how they do learn in and out school.

Method

The evidences for this paper derive from: (a) the meta-analyses of the results of the two above mentioned research projects performed from a reflexivity perspective understood as “the turning back of an inquiry or a theory or a text onto its own formative possibilities” (Macbeth, 2001: 36), as a way of showing how to grow a research program; (b) data collected during the negotiation process with students who will participate in the ethnographical cases. The fact that our research is not intended to be “about” young students, but “with" young students (Hernández, 2011), calls for a set of ethical and methodological matters that have to be carefully and rigorously documented, described and interpret. All this process will be done from the reflexivity perspective just mentioned. We are taken here bricoleur position (Kincheloe and Berry, 2004) that implies that relationships are built using fragments – by creating an assemblage, weaving threads, enjoining parts – in an artisan fashion. From this foundation, we deepen our experience of building methodology as a relationship that places especial attention on how to contact and work with the young people involved in the research; and how to make this process compatible with the needs of a collaborative project.

Expected Outcomes

The aim of this research is to generate a complex picture of the continuities and discontinuities students find in their learning experiences, values and meanings when transiting between the rather “analogical” school environment and a rather digital out of school world. Our first conclusions are based on the need of exploring deeper and in more complex ways the continuities and the interferences between young people’s school experience and values and their personal and social experience and values out school. Our most fundamental outcome to this respect is showing systematically how we have documented this research problem. The conclusions, outcomes and findings regarding the process of setting up the ethnographical cases “with” secondary school students are related to: a) the ethical issues involved in studying students’ personal and social experiences in the overexposed milieus that are digital environments and; b) the methodological issues associated to the understanding of students as “co-researchers”. A methodological decision intended not only to better understand how they learn, but also to foster their engagement to the research project and the school.

References

Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (Eds.). (2000). Multiliteracies: Literacy Learning and the Design of Social Futures. New York: Routledge. Hernández, F. (Ed.) (2011). Investigar con los jóvenes: cuestiones temáticas, metodológicas, éticas y educativas. Barcelona: Dipòsit digital de la Universitat de Barcelona. http://hdl.handle.net/2445/17362 Howe, N., & Strauss, W. (2000). Millennials Rising: The Next Great Generation. New York: Vintage Original. Kincheloe, J.L. & Berry K.S. (2004). Rigour and Complexity in Educational Research. Conceptualizing the bricolage. Maindenhead, UK: Open University Press. Macbeth, D. (2001). Reflexivity" in Qualitative Research: Two Readings, and a Third. Qualitative Inquiry 7/1, 35-68. Oblinger, D., y Oblinger, J. L. (Eds.). (2005). Educating the Net Generation. Washington: Educause. Sancho, J. M. (2009). Digital Technologies and Educational Change. In A. Hargreaves, M. Fullan, A. Lieberman y D. Hopkings (Eds.), International Handbook of Educational Change (pp. 433-444). Dordrecht; Boston; London: Springer.

Author Information

Sancho-Gil Juana M (presenting / submitting)
UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA
DIDACTICS AND EDUCATIONAL MANAGEMENT
BARCELONA
Universitat de Barcelona
Didàctica i Organització Educativa
Barcelona
OPEN UNIVERSITY OF CATALONIA

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.