Session Information
06 SES 08, Learning with Social Media
Parallel Paper Session
Contribution
Personal learning environments provide a new approach to the use the new technologies for learning. It is a potentially promising pedagogical approach for integrating formal and informal learning using web 2.0 tools in higher education context. Web 2.0 tools are referred as the technologies that support communications, collaboration, knowledge creation, storage and sharing, creativity and self-expression. The purpose of this presentation is: to evaluate how do web 2.0 tools are used by higher education students; for what purpose do students use these tools; how web 2.0 tools enhance students’ self-regulated learning. The research theoretical framework is based on self-regulated learning conception defined by Zimmerman (2000) and a three level pedagogical framework that faculty can use to scaffold students self-regulated learning using personal learning environments (Dabbagh&Kitsantas, 2012). Zimmerman (2000) defined self-regulated learning as a student’s ability to independently and proactively engage in self-motivating and behavioral processes to achieve self-set goals. Zimmerman (2000) conceptualized self-regulated learning as a three phase cyclic model which are used in several studies to support self-regulation in online and blended learning environments (Kitsantas&Dabbagh, 2010; Turker&Zingel, 2008; Cho, Demei, Laffey, 2010). A three level pedagogical framework based on levels of interactivity that web 2.0 technologies enables (Dabbagh&Kitsantas, 2012). These levels are: personal information management; social interaction and collaboration; information aggregation and management.
Method
Expected Outcomes
References
Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2012). Personal learning environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(1), 3-8. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.06.002 Cho, M. H., Demei, S., & Laffey, J. (2010). Relationships between self-regulation and social experiences in asynchronous online learning environments. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 21(3), 297. Farkas, M. (2012). Participatory technologies, pedagogy 2.0 and information literacy. Library Hi Tech, 30(1), 5-5. Kitsantas, A., & Dabbagh, N. (2011). The role of web 2.0 technologies in self-regulated learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2011(126), 99-106. doi:10.1002/tl.448 Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64-70. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attainment of self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, PR Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13-39). Orlando: Academic Press
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.