23 SES 10 D, Students as Actors
Parallel Paper Session
European public education is increasingly governed through management by objectives and results. This development also changes the conditions for different concrete practices in everyday school activities. With fixed criteria for both skill levels of individual students, as well as for the effectiveness of individual school units, negotiations arises on how the expected results are allowed to be met. Students in difficulties of passing the fixed limit for acceptable grades become hard currency in the struggle for schools to achieve their set goals in a competitive education market.
From such a meritocratic grounded approach cheating at tests in schools can be regarded as obstructive for schools official assignments of fairly allocation of future life chances. Schoolcheating also risks undermining the social capital that is the ultimate target of values education.
Though schoolcheating is formally a violation of rules at the larger Swedish upper secondary school where my studies took place approximately 80% of the students in the academic prepatory social science program admit of schoolcheating during their secondary education. The overall motive for schoolcheating was to achieve desired grades. One category of students experience difficulties in achieving the centrally set criteria for passing the lowest grades. These students cheat to survive in secondary school. (Fonseca 2006).
Through statistical factor analysis of secondary school pupils' attitudes to the seriousness of schoolcheating and other violations of norms and rules it was found that school cheating can be understood as a socially conventional dilemma. (Nucci 2001) Schoolcheating is thus considered neither as universal right / wrong, or as a free private choice, but as a subject of norm negotiations in a defined culture.
The special interest of this paper is to examine the paradox that both schoolmates and teachers shows a significant tolerance for survivors rulebreaking acts of school cheating. In normresearch, within Sociology of Law, human behavior is regarded not primarily as governed by rules, but by norms (Hydén, 2002). Norms can be understood as socially reproduced imperatives of action, perceived as expectations by the individual (Baier and Svensson, 2009) and thus fall within what Nucci (2001) calls the social conventional domain.
The aim of this study is (i) to examine the norms of survivors school cheating as negotiated in discussions between students, respectively their teachers and (ii) explain how the goal and result-oriented policy terms can be understood as conditional for these norm formation processes.
Baier, M. och Svensson, M. (2009): Om normer. Malmö (S): Liber. Englund, T. och Quennerstedt, A. (2006): Vadå likvärdighet? In: Vetenskapsrådet (2006): Resultatdialog 2006 - forskning inom utbildningsvetenskap, p.51-56. Vetenskapsrådets rapportserie 15:2006. Finnemore, M. och Sikkink, K. (1998): International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. International Organization, 1998 (4), p. 887-917. Fonseca, L. (2006): Gymnasieelevers uppfattningar om eget skolfusk. Växjö (S): Institutionen för pedagogik, Växjö Universitet. Fairclough, N. (2001): A dialectical-relational approach to critical discourse analysis in social research. I Wodak, R. & Meyer, M. (red.), (2001): Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, p.162-186. London: SAGE Publications. Hydén, H. (2002): Normvetenskap. Lund (S): Sociologiska institutionen. Jackson, P. W. (1968/1990): Life in classrooms. New York: Teachers College Press. Nucci, L. P. (2001): Education in the Moral Domain. New York: Cambridge University Press.
00. Central Events (Keynotes, EERA-Panel, EERJ Round Table, Invited Sessions)
Network 1. Continuing Professional Development: Learning for Individuals, Leaders, and Organisations
Network 2. Vocational Education and Training (VETNET)
Network 3. Curriculum Innovation
Network 4. Inclusive Education
Network 5. Children and Youth at Risk and Urban Education
Network 6. Open Learning: Media, Environments and Cultures
Network 7. Social Justice and Intercultural Education
Network 8. Research on Health Education
Network 9. Assessment, Evaluation, Testing and Measurement
Network 10. Teacher Education Research
Network 11. Educational Effectiveness and Quality Assurance
Network 12. LISnet - Library and Information Science Network
Network 13. Philosophy of Education
Network 14. Communities, Families and Schooling in Educational Research
Network 15. Research Partnerships in Education
Network 16. ICT in Education and Training
Network 17. Histories of Education
Network 18. Research in Sport Pedagogy
Network 19. Ethnography
Network 20. Research in Innovative Intercultural Learning Environments
Network 22. Research in Higher Education
Network 23. Policy Studies and Politics of Education
Network 24. Mathematics Education Research
Network 25. Research on Children's Rights in Education
Network 26. Educational Leadership
Network 27. Didactics – Learning and Teaching
The programme is updated regularly (each day in the morning)
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.