How Do CLIL Pre-service Teachers Experience Their Own Professional Learning? Investigating Teacher Professional Learning in Content and Language Integrated Learning

Session Information

ERG SES H 05, Teacher education

Parallel Paper Session

Time:
2012-09-18
13:15-14:45
Room:
FCEE - Aula 2.5
Chair:
Ian Menter

Contribution

Many authors agree in pointing out the crucial role of teachers in educational innovation. This would also apply to the teachers’ role in CLIL contexts. CLIL stands for Content and Language Integrated Learning and it can be defined as “a dual-focused educational approach in which an additional language is used for the learning and teaching of both content and language” (Coyle et al., 2010: 1).


CLIL is identified as a priority area by the European Commission. In the key document “Promoting Language Learning and Linguistic Diversity: An Action Plan 2004 – 2006”, CLIL is acknowledged to have “a major contribution to make to the Union’s language goals” (Commission of the European Communities, 2003: 8). Several European institutions have highlighted the effectiveness of CLIL to improve not only language competence but also to build intercultural communication skills, which is considered to be essential for mobility, employment and social inclusion in a globalised society. This is the reason why the European Union has supported different projects and studies about CLIL, including the development of a European Network.


"The Changing European Classroom - the Potential of Plurilingual Education," a European Symposium held in March 2005, insisted on the necessity that learners receive CLIL education across different educational levels. Attention was also called to the fact that CLIL Teachers should be offered specific training in CLIL. It is relevant, therefore, to examine how CLIL teachers’ skills and attitudes are developed in teacher education programmes.


Across Europe we can find different courses, programmes and modules designed to develop the required competences for CLIL teaching. One of these is the "U-TEAch" programme, a one-year Master’s in Education degree for graduate students willing to become CLIL secondary teachers, with a specific focus on teaching their subject in bilingual and international contexts. This programme is offered by the "Center for Teaching and Learning" at Utrecht University (the Netherlands).


This paper aims to present the results of a case study carried out to gain insight into the appreciation of the CLIL-specific modules of the “U-TEAch” programme. The overarching goal of the project is to analyse the main factors involved in the pre-service CLIL teacher professional learning process. Specifically, the research questions to be addressed are: 1) What are the CLIL pre-service teacher gains and challenges as perceived by learners, teachers and mentors? 2) Which successful CLIL practices, as identified by learners, teachers and mentors, can be transferred to the European context?


The theoretical framework behind this study rests on socio-constructivist theory, which establishes that knowledge cannot be transmitted but constructed upon prior knowledge through a social dialogue. It we apply this theory to teacher education, we should understand pre-service teacher professional learning as a knowledge building process which takes place thanks to the interaction with different stakeholders, i.e. mentors, lecturers, pupils and peers.

Method

This work is a case study which moves within the qualitative research paradigm. As opposed to other paradigms which aim for explanation and generalization, the qualitative research intends to understand holistically the complexity of the relationships established in a particular reality. My purpose is to understand the situation from the perspective of those involved to build a well-informed and consensual understanding of the reality which I investigate. As a researcher, I intend to report with clarity and intellectual rigour about the perceptions, thoughts, feelings, experiences and values of people involved in research. The different perceptions by different stakeholders are examined through a triangulation strategy which leads to a multi-perspectival study. The research instruments used in this study comprise: participant observation, questionnaires, interviews, focus group and document and materials review. In order to analyse the data, we use the constant comparison/Grounded theory (Glaser & Strauss, 1967) approach. The thematic codes emerging from the data eventually cluster into categories. This analytic process is supported with the program ATLAS-ti, a piece of software for qualitative data analysis.

Expected Outcomes

We firstly describe the structure of the U-TEAch programme. Secondly, we focus on the pre-service teachers’ perceptions of their own professional learning, taking into account which competence areas they think are crucial to develop as CLIL teachers, how far they are in the development of those areas and to what extent their needs are being covered by the programme. Additionally, we examine their views about the role of their mentors, teachers and fellow students for their own teaching education process. Finally, we discuss what we can learn from the U-TEAch programme about initial teacher education for CLIL. The expected outcomes of the study are: 1) For the participants, the study intends to be an opportunity for reflection and learning, as well as for raising awareness about their own learning process. 2) For the researcher, as this study constitutes a doctoral thesis, it aims to be a learning process about educational research. 3) For the academic field, this piece of research attempts to gain insight into the factors that have an influence on pre-service CLIL teacher professional learning. This will broaden our knowledge about how to improve pre-service CLIL teacher education and how to design education courses for European CLIL teachers.

References

BERTAUX, P. et al (2010). The CLIL Teacher’s Competence Grid. Available at http://www.ccn-clil.eu/index.php?name=Content&nodeIDX=3857 [Accessed 31 January 2012] COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES (2003). Promoting Language Learning and Linguistic Diversity: An Action Plan 2004 – 2006. Report 449, Brussels. Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2003:0449:FIN:EN:PDF [Accessed 31 January 2012] COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES (2008). Multilingualism: An Asset for Europe and a Shared Commitment. Report 556, Brussels. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/languages/pdf/comm2008_en.pdf [Accessed 31 January 2012] COYLE, D. et al (2010). CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge: CUP. FLICK, U. (1998): An introduction to qualitative research. London: SAGE. GLASER B.G. and STRAUSS A. (1967). Discovery of Grounded Theory. Strategies for Qualitative Research. Sociology Press. EURYDICE (2006). Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) at School in Europe. Brussels: Eurydice. MEHISTO, P. et al. (2008). Uncovering CLIL. Content and Language Integrated Learning in Bilingual and Multilingual Education. Oxford: Macmillan Education. SOCRATES-COMENIUS 2.1 (2006). CLIL across Contexts: A Scaffolding Framework for CLIL Teacher Education. Available at http://clil.uni.lu/CLIL/Project.html [Accessed 31 January 2012] STAKE, R. E. (1995): The art of case study research. London: SAGE.

Author Information

Estefanía Almenta López (presenting / submitting)
University of Malaga, Spain
University of Malaga, Spain

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.