Learning to Teach; Teaching to Learn: Developing Effective Doctoral Teachers
Author(s):
Crystal Fulton (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2012
Format:
Paper

Session Information

12 SES 03, Parallel Paper Session / Round Table

Paper Session/Round Table

Time:
2012-09-18
17:15-18:45
Room:
FFL - Aula 36
Chair:
Chiara Ravagni

Contribution

One anticipated outcome of a doctorate is teaching.  However, while doctoral students are frequently called upon to participate in teaching, they often do not receive formal instruction and support for university teaching (e.g., Smith et al, 2010).  In 2010-2011 a new course, entitled Learning to Teach; Teaching to Learn. Developing Effective Practices in 3rd Level Education, was offered in University College Dublin, providing doctoral students with the opportunity to explore effective means of creating curricula, presenting content, engaging students in learning and integrating e-learning tools in teaching and learning in an actual undergraduate class environment.  

A need for formal teaching support for development of doctoral student teaching was observed in the behaviour of doctoral students in the UCD School of Information & Library Studies (SILS).  Doctoral students often expressed a desire to participate in teaching in the school, but lacked training and skills to teach effectively. Teaching is an activity that many doctoral students will do throughout their academic careers; however, doctoral students typically lack a clear understanding of the challenges associated with teaching and of the equivalent significance of teaching in 3rd level education in comparison with research activities.  Recognizing and addressing the need to support doctoral teaching is of mutual benefit to development of doctoral education and to teaching in the university.

Providing teaching support for doctoral students is not unique to a particular subject, school, or institution.  Across disciplines and institutions worldwide, doctoral students may find themselves teaching (e.g., Mycock, 2007) and there seems to be general agreement that formal teaching preparation of doctoral students is needed, formal teaching support is often lacking.  For example, Brightman (2009) observed that renewed interest in teaching in business schools had not transferred to formal, systemic preparation of doctoral students to teach.  Similarly, Watson et al (2010) noted that science, technology, engineering and mathematics graduate programs often provide little or no formal training for doctoral students to teach, raising concerns the transition from doctoral student to faculty and the quality of course delivery.  Harland and Plangger (2004) and Hopwood and Stocks (2008) observed conflict between the goals of research (knowledge generation) and teaching (knowledge transfer) which highlighted the additional learning needs of doctoral students to accommodate both research and teaching expectations.

A challenge applicable to students across disciplines became clear:

How can we best prepare and mentor our doctoral students to become effective teachers?  

Method

A new course/module was rolled out in 2010-2011, Learning to Teach; Teaching to Learn. Developing Effective Practices in 3rd Level Education, which offered a learning opportunity for doctoral students to explore effective means of teaching. Module seminars provided a space for doctoral students to discuss teaching theory and methods, explore the teaching process, and develop a repertoire of best teaching practices. This work formed the foundation for their participation as instructors in classroom, lab, and small group session environments in Web 2.0 & Social Media. This undergraduate module provided an ideal context for teaching and learning development, since it includes exploration, evaluation and use of a wide range of social media tools in conjunction with e-learning. The nearly 90 undergraduate students taking this module in SILS also came from across the university, reflecting again the interdisciplinary nature of our work together. Doctoral students’ experience culminated in their creation of a teaching e-portfolio, in which doctoral students gathered examples of good practice from the literature and reflected on their teaching experiences.

Expected Outcomes

The overall approach to bringing doctoral and undergraduate students together in a teaching and learning environment was highly experimental, enabling doctoral students to engage in innovative teaching approaches and providing undergraduate students with learning opportunities that extended beyond the traditional lecture format. Both doctoral and undergraduate students were very positive about their experience. Doctoral students reflected upon lessons learned as they brought theory and practice together in classroom setting. Undergraduate students were enthusiastic about their module, and commented positively on their interaction with doctoral students. The overall success of linking doctoral and undergraduate modules offers one pathway to promoting a university-wide approach to doctoral training as effective educators as well as increasing undergraduate student engagement. Significantly, this project has approached doctoral teaching development from a constructivist perspective, enabling all stakeholders to participate; this is new to doctoral teaching development generally. A sustainable approach to doctoral teaching development which takes both doctoral and institutional perspectives into consideration and which can be applied in a variety of disciplines fulfils a critical teaching and learning gap both locally and internationally.

References

Brightman, H.J. (2009). The Need for Teaching Doctoral Students How to Teach. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 4: 1-11. Forming Global Minds: Strategic Plan to 2014. (2010). University College Dublin. Available: http://www.ucd.ie/t4cms/plan_FINAL.pdf. Harland, T. and Plangger, G. (2004). The Postgraduate Chameleon: Changing Roles in Doctoral Education. Active Learning in Higher Education, 5 (1): 73-86. Hopwood, N. and Stocks, C. (2008). Teaching Development for Doctoral Students: What Can We Learn From Activity Theory? International Journal for Academic Development, 13 (3): 187–198. Mycock, A. (2007). ‘Where’s the Real Lecturer?’: The Experiences of Doctoral Educators in the UK. European Political Science, 6: 208-218. Smith, A., Bradshaw, T., Burnett, K., Docherty, D., Purcell, W., and Worthington, S. (2010). One Step Beyond: Making the Most of Postgraduate Education. UK: Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS). Available: www.bis.gov.uk/one-step-beyond. Watson, M., Corbett, K., Prather, K., Carpenter, J., Cronk, S. (2010). Fostering Dissemination Skills in Stem Doctoral Students: Tips for the PhD Student and the General Impact on Stem Undergraduates. Paper AC 2010-2050. Presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Conference, Louisville, KY, June 20-23. Available: http://iserc.latech.edu/pubs/2010/2010_ASEE_2050_Mentoring_Grad_Students.pdf.

Author Information

Crystal Fulton (presenting / submitting)
University College Dublin
School of Information & Library Studies
Dublin

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.