Creating Citizenship Communities
Author(s):
Conference:
ECER 2013
Format:
Paper

Session Information

14 SES 09 A, Policies and Actions to Promote School-Family-Community Links - Communitarian Practices

Paper Session

Time:
2013-09-12
11:00-12:30
Room:
A-102
Chair:
Aitor Gomez

Contribution

It is clear that community and citizenship have been key factors in political debate for many years and this has been very explicitly so since at least the Clinton and Blair eras during which, respectively, Etzioni (1995) and Giddens (1994) advised about new ways of forming political frameworks or doctrines. It is not surprising in this changing political and constitutional context which affects the relationship between nations, states, individuals and social groups that there would be a greater emphasis on both citizenship and community. References to citizenship and community signal not only the ways in which change can be understood but also the means by which society intends to achieve equality and diversity whilst avoiding uniformity and fragmentation. In other words citizenship and community are both key concepts and social practices.

 

Policy makers, the media and others urge schools to ensure that young people recognize the value of community cohesion and contribute to its achievement. Teachers may assume that community cohesion can be achieved through learning from the formal curriculum (e.g. in citizenship lessons); through whole school projects (e.g. learning about business enterprise); and by community liaison (e.g. developing positive relationships with members of older people’s residential homes).

 

Through this process community cohesion is characterized generally, as part of a rather vague intention to improve society and students are often seen as part of the problem. Young people are seen as being in need of reform through the imposition of officially sanctioned forms of knowledge and types of engagement. As such students’ existing informal and officially unrecognized understandings and actions to create communities with peers and others may be disregarded.

 

We suggest that inappropriately vague understandings of community and negative perceptions of young people lead only to the failure of educational strategies to promote community cohesion. This paper is of a study to explore young people’s characterizations of - and actions for - community cohesion; contribute to an enhanced recognition by policy makers and others of the positive contributions that are - and can be - made by young people; and, make it possible for professional educators to take action that is more likely to have real impact in the strengthening of communities. 

The research aimed to:

  • ascertain activities for community cohesion that are managed by schools and to what extent these initiatives are perceived by students to contribute to their understanding and practice;
  • ascertain how students characterise community cohesion and what range of community (both virtual and actual) activities they are engaged in within and beyond school;

Method

The project was a mixed methods study with three distinct phrases. The first phase of the project was to conduct an extensive literature review. The literature review was achieved by means of a search of literature through academic data bases, analysing different types of literature focusing on the secondary age phase (11-18) in work relevant to England. In phrase two of the project we administered a national online survey to schools. Some 800 schools were contacted in the online survey. Target respondents were those staff with responsibilities for community cohesion and/or citizenship education. Several themes were pursued in line with key issues identified through the literature review. These were (1) school context (2) barriers and opportunities (3) delivery (4) staff perspectives on students’ experiences and (5) impact. The final phase of the project was the fieldwork that was conducted in 8 schools. The sample was drawn from a list of 39 schools in England which participated in the national online. The selection of schools was directed by three main factors; geographical location (urban-rural), ethnic mix (predominantly white-ethnically diverse) and disadvantage (defined as neighbourhood deprivation). Sixteen focus group discussions were conducted with year 10 and year 11 students.

Expected Outcomes

In relation to the specifics of our initial analysis of data in the wider context of relevant literature we wish to highlight two areas of significance. Firstly, there may be a lack of connection between work in schools and the lives of young people beyond school. Young people know a good deal about their communities but this may not be taken fully into account by teachers. Secondly, there may be a lack of co-ordination between the citizenship education teachers and those in the school charged with the responsibility for strengthening community involvement. In the survey, the vast majority of schools declare their commitment to both citizenship education and community cohesion but respondents less commonly reported that their schools had specific objectives or targets which linked citizenship with the community: just under two-fifths (39 per cent) indicated that their school had specific objectives or targets around citizenship and/or working with the community reported that these linkages are made. The data from the fieldwork suggest that although teachers’ practices and school policies aimed at fostering a sense of community and promoting community cohesion, young people’s experiences suggest that citizenship strategies were not always effective.

References

Ajegbo, K. (2007). Diversity and Citizenship: Curriculum Review. London, DfEs. Annette, J. (2004). Community, politics and citizenship education. In A. Lockyer, B. Crick & J. Annette (eds.) Education for democratic citizenship. London, Ashgate. Arthur, J., Gearon, L. & Sears, A. (2010). Education, politics and religion. Abingdon, Routledge. Atkins, R., & Hart, D. (2003). Neighbourhoods, Adults and the Development of Civic Identity in Urban Youth. Applied Development Science, 7(3), 156-164. Crick, B. (2000). Essays on Citizenship. London, Continuum. Davies, I., Flanagan, B., Hogarth, S., Mountford, P. and Philpott, J. (2009). Asking questions about participation. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 4, 1, 25-40. Etzioni, A. (1995). The Spirit of Community: rights, responsibilities and the communitarian agenda. London, Fontana. Giddens, A. (1994). Beyond Left and Right — the Future of Radical Politics. Cambridge, Polity Press. Gillborn, D. (2006). Citizenship education as placebo: ‘standards’, institutional racism and education policy. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 1, 1, pp.83-104. Heater, D. (1999). What is Citizenship? Cambridge, Polity Press. Kiwan, D. (2008) Education for Inclusive Citizenship. Abingdon, Routledge. Osler, A. & Starkey, H. (2006) Education for Democratic Citizenship: a review of research, policy and practice 1995-2005. Research Papers in Education, 24, 433-466. Pattie, C, Seyd, P & Whiteley, P. (2004). Citizenship in Britain: values, participation and democracy. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Sears, A., Davies, I., Reid, A. (in press). From Britishness to Nothingness and Back Again. In A. Mycock & C. McGlynn (eds.) Britishness, Identity and Citizenship: The View From Abroad. Bern: Peter Lang. Sinclair, R. (2004) Participation in practice: making it meaningful, effective and sustainable. Children and Society, 18(2), 106–18. Whiteley, P. (2004) A Health Check for British Democracy: What Do We Know About Participation and its Effects in Britain? Swindon: Economic and Social Research Council.

Author Information

University of York
Education
York

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.