Cognitive Capitalism and Workplace Learning
Author(s):
James Avis (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2013
Format:
Paper

Session Information

02 SES 02 A, Review of VET Research and Theory Construction in VET

Paper Session

Time:
2013-09-10
15:15-16:45
Room:
A-101
Chair:
Philipp Gonon

Contribution

Research addressing workplace learning and VET frequently locates this within the pursuit of competitiveness and social justice (Mjelde and Daly, 2012). In the EU,  i-VET as well as c-VET is seen to play a significant role in the development of social inclusion/cohesion (EU 2002, 2010; and see JVET, 2011). This rests alongside the importance attached to the ongoing development of the knowledge based economy (Kbe). There are a number of ways in which the changes that have impacted upon Western economies in general and the EU in particular have been understood. Such understandings have influenced the way in which the relationship between workplace learning and knowledge have been conceptualised. There is an extensive literature that addresses workplace learning relating  this to the needs of employers and workers, as well as more generally to social justice (see for example Malloch et al, 2011). This paper explores a particular feature of these debates. Specifically, it seeks to address the significance of workplace learning, its recognition and salience in a Kbe, examining the relevance of theorisations of cognitive capitalism for such conceptualisations (Boutang, 2011; Peters and Bulut, 2011). Much writing on workplace learning is orientated towards a social justice agenda that seeks to recognise and value the skills,  particularly of disadvantaged workers in unskilled, low waged work. The social justice agenda aims to accredit and accord value to such work in order to provide equal opportunities, to credentialise learning and to recognise the often undervalued skills embodied in such labour. There is however a tension between workplace learning, its social justice commitments and the capitalist context in which much work occurs. Workplace learning can readily fold over into the development of variable labour power and value-added waged labour, both of which operate within and serve capitalist interests. Theorisations of cognitive capitalism suggest that capitalism has entered a new stage of development. This argument aligns with analyses of financialisation which suggest the manner in which surplus value is produced has undergone transformation (Fumagalli and Mazzadra, 2010; Marazzi, 2011; Vercellone, 2010). That is to say, the 'Kbe' is qualitatively different to the industrial capitalism that preceded it and constitutes a new stage of development. In some respects this represents a reversal from the real to formal subsumption of value, reflecting historical processes of primitive accumulation and the appropriation of common land in the early stages of capitalism. Whereas industrial capitalism was orientated towards the accumulation and expansion of capital, the current stage is concerned with scarcity, akin to that characteristic of monopoly capitalism. In addition this argument prioritises the development of knowledge and views this as a collective and implicitly democratic accomplishment that occurs outside the direct control of capital. In contradistinction to those accounts of workplace learning in which learning is centred on work, cognitive capitalism emphasises the role of 'common' or collectively formed knowledge developed outside the labour process which is then appropriated by capital in the pursuit of surplus value. 

Method

The paper is set within European discussions of Kbe and competitiveness. It draws upon analyses of work, workplace learning, cognitive capitalism and knowledge, locating such debates within particular historical and socio-economic conditions. Knowledge, for writers associated with cognitive capitalism, Kbe's and the information society, has become an important productive force. It is suggested that the EU and other western economies have undergone a profound economic transformation over the last thirty years (Brown, et al 2011). For writers associated with cognitive capitalism this has become a new social imaginary, as Fordism was in the past. In cognitive capitalism a premium is placed on co-operation and collective processes that arise not only within but also outside the workplace. Here the notion of social production plays an important role (Engeström, 2010). There appears to be a paradox, on one level the production of knowledge increasingly arises outside the workplace as a result of cooperative and collaborative labour. Yet on the hand there is a recognition of precariousness and the intensification of labour, its oppressive and exploitative nature. In the latter case, rather than suggesting a break between work and wider social life, the former becomes all embracing (Cederstrom and Fleming, 2012).

Expected Outcomes

The paper explores the way knowledge and workplace learning is mobilised in research, addressing the workplace, contrasting such analyses to theories of cognitive capitalism. The paper aims to examine theorisations of cognitive capitalism, considering whether these lead to an intellectual and political cul-de-sac or whether they make a substantial contribute to discussions of workplace learning and knowledge. There is a tension between conceptualisations of workplace learning and the production of knowledge. In research that seeks to validate the knowledge and skills of disadvantaged workers the labour process as well as the type of knowledge produced is qualitatively different to that of the 'imaginary' of the knowledge worker in cognitive capitalism, whose labour process is significantly different. The question is then posed as to how significant or generalisable such arguments are? Are they attach to a very particular segment of the labour force? Are they so over generalised as to be meaningless? The paper seeks to address these questions and in so doing considers the contribution theories of cognitive capitalism can make to analyses of workplace learning.

References

Boutang, Y. M., (2011) Cognitive Capitalism Brown, P., Lauder, H., Ashton, D (2011) The Global Auction: The Broken Promises of Education, Jobs, and Incomes Cederstrom, C. , Fleming, P. (2012) Dead man working. Engeström, Y. (2010) From teams to knots: activity-theoretical studies of collaboration and learning at work, EU (2002) The Copenhagen Declaration, http://ec.europa.eu/education/pdf/doc125_en.pdf EU (2010) The Bruges Communiqué http://ec.europa.eu/education/lifelong-learning-policy/doc/vocational/bruges_en.pdf Fumagalli, A., Mazzadra, S. (Eds) (2010) Crisis in the global economy, Marazzi, C. (2011) The violence of financial capitalism, Marx, K. (1973) Grundrisse Mjelde, L., Daly, R. (2012) Aspects of vocational pedagogy as practice: Decolonizing minds and negotiating local knowledge, International Journal of Training Research, 10(1) Peters, M. A,. Bulut, E. (eds) (2011) Cognitive capitalism, education and digital labour Vercellone, C. (2010) The crisis of the law of value and the becoming-rent of profit, in Fumagalli, A., Mazzadra, S. (Eds) Crisis in the global economy,

Author Information

James Avis (presenting / submitting)
University of Huddesrfield
School of Education
Huddersfield

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.