How "Green" Are European Primary School Curricula? - A Comparative Study
Author(s):
Astrid Rank (presenting / submitting) Anna-Katharina Hanisch (presenting) Günther Seeber
Conference:
ECER 2013
Format:
Paper

Session Information

03 SES 04 A, Promoting Sustainable Development and Entrepreneural Learning

Paper Session

Time:
2013-09-11
09:00-10:30
Room:
D-402
Chair:
Uwe Hameyer

Contribution

The UNESCO broadly promotes education for sustainable development (ESD), and the UN Decade of Education for Sustainable Development (2005‑2014) is still going on. A lot of effort is taken to develop teaching materials for understanding climate change, disaster risk reduction, biodiversity, poverty reduction and sustainable consumption, for example. Nevertheless, the OECD (2008, 4) regards the current implementation of ESD as a school subject as insufficient because curricula are typically concentrating solely on environmental issues without combining social, economic, and environmental topics.

We believe that curricula are a main lever to help transfer sustainable issues into everyday teaching and that the curricular embodiment of sustainability is worth investigating. We therefore conducted a cross‑national analysis of primary schools’ curricula from five European countries (Germany, Italy, Romania, Spain and England). This comparative study is part of the “Green Hero” EU COMENIUS-project (2012‑2014), which targets primary school children and aims to improve their environmental knowledge and behavior with the help of an interactive, state‑of‑the‑art e‑learning tool. One precondition for developing such a common tool, despite varying learning cultures, is its integration into the requirements of school curricula.

For this purpose, we developed a questionnaire for our partners in order to determine differences and commonalities in curricula with regard to general missions of primary schools in different countries, their structural principles and their domains and learning goals. The partners sent us English versions or own translations of relevant content of their curricula. We developed an analytic scheme and based on this we categorized the results of our curricular analysis. We gained an insight into the quantitative and qualitative integration of ESD, which will be the main point of our presentation.

Because of the above-mentioned dominance of environmental issues instead of sustainable ones we did check their appearance and were able to evaluate the level of integration into a concept of sustainability. As a consequence of the overall project design, we particularly focused on the aspects of “waste,” “water” and “energy.” Are these topics part of primary schools’ curricula? How are they dealt with? Do the curricula promote competencies like critical and interconnected thinking, decision making and acting?

Method

For most teachers, the curriculum serves as an important basis for lesson planning. Therefore, the content of the curriculum influences what children learn. In order to find out which specific teaching content each country focuses on, it is therefore particularly useful to analyze and compare the various curricula. In our study we aim to identify the “green” potential of the different curricula. Do the curricula allow for the integration of programs for environmental education and sustainability? In addition, we are interested in the general structure of the school system because such institutional regulations affect the duration and nature of education measures. Our comparative study focuses on the primary school curricula of England, Italy, Spain, Romania and Germany (federal state Rhineland Palatinate). The curricula have been translated into English and are compared with regard to different categories, such as - curriculum structure, structural principles - relevant domains in respect of environmental education - the curriculum’s main ideas relevant for environmental education - taxonomic level of competencies concerning environmental education mentioned in the curricula - special programs in the countries to foster environmental education at primary school level

Expected Outcomes

In our comparison we found a broad and varying provision of sustainability issues. The variation is due to underlying missions and structural differences. In general, pupils meet important environmental issues according to the curricula. But the intensity as well as the integration into ESD differ, in some cases to a vast extent. We are able to make comparative statements about the curricular importance of sustainability issues in a cross national perspective. The comparison identifies desiderata for strengthening school efforts to foster understanding and awareness of sustainability. Furthermore, it can form the basis for designing intervention studies regarding the effect of curricular implementation and pupils’ understanding. Despite the expansion of international comparative educational research, there have as yet been no comparative analyses of the implementation of ESD in school curricula. Our research is a first step to close this gap. We present our frame of analysis for further use and improvement in order to continue and broaden our research.

References

Consejería de Educación, Cultura y Deportes (2007): Boletín Oficial de Canarias núm. 112. Department for Education (Ed.) (2013): Primary curriculum subjects. http://www.education.gov.uk/schools/teachingandlearning/curriculum/primary (22.1.2013) Department for Education (Ed.) (2013): The school curriculum. http://www.education.gov.uk/schools/teachingandlearning/curriculum (22.1.2013) European Commission (Ed.) (2009): Structures of Education and Training Systems in Europe – Romania (2009/10). http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/education/eurydice/documents/eurybase/structures/041_RO_EN.pdf (22.01.2013) Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte (2006): Disposiciones generales. BOE núm. 106. Ministerium für Bildung, Frauen und Jugend (Ed.) (2006): Rahmenplan Grundschule. Teilrahmenplan Sachunterricht. http://grundschule.bildung-rp.de/fileadmin/user_upload/grundschule.bildung-rp.de/Downloads/Rahmenplan/GSch_Teilrahmenplan_Sachunterricht.pdf (22.1.2013) Ministerul Educaţiei Şi Cercetării Consiliul Naţional Pentru Curriculum (2003a): Programa Scolara Cunoasterea Mediului. Clasele I – A Ii-A Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca (Ed.) (2012): Indicazioni nazionali per il curricolo. http://hubmiur.pubblica.istruzione.it/web/istruzione/prot5559_12 (22.1.2013) OECD (2008): Education for Sustainable Development – http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/52/1/41372200.pdf United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (Ed.) (2006): Globalization and Education for Sustainable Development. Sustaining the Future. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0014/001492/149295e.pdf (22.1.2013)

Author Information

Astrid Rank (presenting / submitting)
University of Landau
Educational Science
Landau
University Koblenz-Landau
Educational Science
Landau
University of Landau
Social sciences
Landau

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.