Recognition of Tacit Skills And Prior Learning: Capturing Informal Competences in Relation to Occupational Areas
Author(s):
Natasha Kersh (presenting / submitting) David Guile
Conference:
ECER 2013
Format:
Paper

Session Information

02 SES 07 A, Permeability and Recognition of Prior Learning

Paper Session

Time:
2013-09-11
17:15-18:45
Room:
A-101
Chair:
Andreas Saniter

Contribution

The proposed paper discusses the importance of recognising and certifying tacit skills and informal competences in the workplace, specifically addressing  a gap in the research dealing with approaches to identifying and ascertaining tacit skills and competences in relation to specific occupational areas. The paper draws on the findings from the project “I CARE - Informal Competences Assessment and Recognition for Employment funded by the European Commission in the Lifelong Learning Leonardo da Vinci Programme, coordinated by TECLA Association (Italy) in partnership with a group of local authorities, Universities and research institutions from Italy, Romania, United Kingdom and the Netherlands. The project aimed at promoting innovative procedures for the recognition and certification of informal competences and for the transparency of qualifications, within common framework such as EQF (European Qualification Framework) and ECVET (The European Credit system for Vocational Education and Training).

The recognition and assessment of tacit skills within a specific occupational area is an important contribution to the process of accreditation and recognition of prior learning for particular qualifications.  Prior learning can be learning acquired formally, non-formally and/or informally, however it is learning that has not been fully acknowledged or accredited. The paper discusses the need for acknowledging and recognising prior learning as a vital part of the process of assessing tacit skills and competences within a range of contexts.

 

Capturing and evaluating tacit skills and equating them within the relevant occupational context in order to demonstrate the level of competence will contribute to the capacity of learners to demonstrate that they can meet the assessment requirements for a unit through knowledge, understanding or skills they already possess.  However, before such skills could be accredited towards a credit or qualification, they need to be elicited, assessed and matched against specifications of particular occupational competences. Therefore, as the paper argues, there is a need for the development of a methodological framework that would allow the capture and contribution to the assessment of the informal competences as a part of the accreditation process in relevant contexts and settings. The research aims to contribute to the development of a methodological approach for eliciting and capturing tacit skills and informal competences through graphical modelling of the process of evaluating of competences and identifying the links between competences.   The study has employed the Dynamic Concept Analysis (DCA) modelling method (Kontiainen 2002) that can be used as a tool to build conceptual models for capturing informal competences and demonstrating the ways in which these skills could be recontextualised and made visible in new contexts.   In adopting this perspective, we argue that tacit skills and informal competences could be used as a foundation to help people to acquire formal credit or qualification and to gain entry to/or progress within an occupational field.

Method

I CARE project’s research is based on following methodological approaches: • Action research through collaborating with organisations that have experience in developing and using a range of mechanisms for accreditation and recognition of informal competences in all partners countries. • Undertaking a thorough desk research/literature review on the issues related to accreditation and recognition of informal competences in all partners countries • Collaborating with ICARE project partners. • Comparative research carried out by research institutions in Italy, Netherlands, Romania and the UK. The research institutions have analysed national contexts and approaches to accreditation and recognition of informal competences. The national research has been compared and examples of good practice have been identified.

Expected Outcomes

The paper argues that tacit knowledge could be used as a resource to help people to acquire a formal credit or qualification, to gain entry to/or progress within an occupational field. The research emphasised the significance of the recognition and accreditation of tacit skills and informal competences in work-related contexts and considered the ways of the development of approaches of assessing adults’ prior skills and experiences in the context of the occupational domain. The discussion has built strongly on the challenges of capturing and acknowledging tacit skills and competences that have been developed through a range of previous experiences within both formal and informal learning settings in relation to the requirements of an occupational field. The study contributes to the development of a tool for assessment of informal competences for specific occupations and shows the potential of the Dynamic Concept Analysis approach as a method of recognition of informal competences for a specific occupational context of social care. The paper will underline a potential for learning across the countries and for sharing experiences on how develop appropriate strategies for accrediting and assessing a range of informal competences in the context of vocational education and training.

References

Colardyn, D. and J. Bjornavold. 2004. Validation of Formal, Non-Formal and Informal Learning: policy and practices in EU Member States. European Journal of Education 39, no 1: 69-89. Eraut, Michael. 1985. Knowledge creation and knowledge use in professional contexts. Studies in Higher Education 10, no 2: 117–133. Eraut, Michael. 2000. Non-formal learning and tacit knowledge in professional work. British Journal of Educational Psychology 70, no 1: 113–136. Evans, Karen. 2002. The Challenges of Making Learning Visible. In Working to Learn: Transforming Learning in the Workplace, ed. K. Evans, P. Hodkinson and L. Unwin, 77-92. London: Routledge. Evans, K., N. Kersh and S. Kontiainen. 2004. Recognition of tacit skills: sustaining learning outcomes in adult learning and work re-entry. International Journal of Training and Development 8, no. 1: 54–72. Kersh, N and K. Evans.2005. Self-Evaluation of Tacit Skills and Competences. EuropeanEducation 37, no 2, 87-98. Kersh, N., Evans, K and Kontiainen. S (2011) ‘Use of conceptual models in self-evaluation of personal competences in learning and in planning for change’, International Journal of Training and Development, 15(4). Evans, K., N. Kersh and A. Sakamoto. 2004. Learner Biographies: Exploring Tacit Dimensions of Knowledge and Skills. In Workplace Learning in Context, ed. H. Rainbird, A. Fuller and A. Munro, 222-241. Routledge: London. Fuller, A. and L. Unwin. 2003. Learning as Apprentices in the Contemporary UK Workplace: creating and managing expansive and restrictive participation. Journal of Education and Work 16, no 4. Guile, D. 2010. The learning challenge of the knowledge economy. Rotterdam: Sense. Kontiainen, Seppo. 2002. Dynamic Concepts Analysis (DCA): Integrating information in conceptual models. Helsinki: Helsinki University Press. Nonaka, I. and H. Takeuchi, H.1995. The Knowledge Creating Company. New York: Oxford University Press. Polanyi, M. 1966. The Tacit Dimension. New York: Doubleday.

Author Information

Natasha Kersh (presenting / submitting)
Institute of Education, University of London
London
Institute of Education
Lifelong and Comparative Education
LONDON

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.