Intercultural Competences and Self-identity As Key Factors To Culture Adaptation

Session Information

20 SES 05 A, Creativity and Intercultural Learning among HE Students

Paper Session

Time:
2013-09-11
11:00-12:30
Room:
D-404
Chair:
Maria-Àngels Subirats

Contribution

Nowadays, internationalization is linked to mobility across universities. In that sense, students more often cross borders to study in a foreign country and live and full study abroad experience. In that sense, the present study aims to examine how intercultural competences help students to adapt successfully to the new culture based on self-identity. According to Ward´s model (2001), adaptation may be meaningfully divided into two domains: 1) Psychological domain (emotional/affective) and 2) Sociocultural (behavioral) domain related to the ability to “fit in'' to acquire culturally appropriate skills and to negotiate interactive aspects of the host environment.

In that sense, according to the Multicultural Personality Model (Van Oudenhoven & Van der Zee, 2001), there are five key competences that ease intercultural adaptation. Concretely, factors as cultural empathy, openmindedness, emotional Stability, social initiative, and flexibility have been related to physically and emotionally adjustment in different countries (Van Oudenhoven & Van der Zee, 2002; Leong, 2007). However, research has shown that individuals frame situations differently dependent on how people construe or represent themselves (e.g., Brewer & Gardner, 1996; Stapel & van der Zee, 2006). A personal identity orientation refers to an individual’s self-conception primarily in terms of their individual traits and characteristics. A positive view about the self is derived from a sense of uniqueness compared to others. A relational identity orientation refers to an individuals’ conception of their relatedness to other individuals and a collective identity orienta­tion revolves around a self-conception in terms of being a group member and describing oneself in terms of characteristics that are connected to the group (Vos & van der Zee, 2011).

Based on the former models, we expect to find differences between cultures on intercultural competences and culture identification, a relationship between intercultural competences, self-identity and outcomes adaptation variables. That is, in order to successfully integrate into their ‘adopted’ culture, students must learn to understand, communicate and cooperate with those around them. In that respect intercultural competences development may help students to adapt and succeed in the new host culture. 



Method

Based on a previous research among exchange students (Carmona, van der Zee & Oudenhoven, 2013), the present extended study aimed to validate the former one in a sample with international students who studied full Business degree abroad. To carry out the study, a questionnaire at the beginning of the semester, was administered to a sample of 169 international students of a Dutch International Business School. The 53,8% of the sample were women and the mean age was 20 (SD = 1,98). Nationality was grouped according to Gupta, Hanges y Dorfman (2002). The 43,8% of participant came from Germanic culture, the 29,6% from Nordic culture, the 9,5% from Eastern Europe, the 7,7% from Asian culture, the 7,1% from South Europe, the 1,2% from Anglo culture, and the 1,2% from Latin America. The questionnaire consisted in different scales measuring English language proficiency, intercultural competences, self-identity orientation, culture identification and outcomes of culture adaptation.

Expected Outcomes

In general, results indicated a significant and positive relationship between English language skills and four Intercultural Competences (cultural empathy, openmindedness, social initiative, and flexibility), except for emotional stability that was not related. According to our expectations, student with more cultural empathy, openmindedness, social initiative, and flexibility identified more with international students and felt less uncomfortable adjusting to new values. Interestingly, students with less emotional stability felt more guilty to leave family, had more pressures and were less adjusted to the new cultural values. Regarding gender differences, results showed that women were more cultural empathized and had more interpersonal identity compared to men. In contrast, men had more emotional stability. Related to cultural differences, students from Asian culture had lower social initiative compared to Nordic, Germanic and Eastern cultures. In addition, Southern and Eastern Europeans were less emotionally stable compared to Nordic Europeans. Additionally, results showed that culture moderated the relationship between intercultural competences, social support and life satisfaction. In conclusion, there are different ways of viewing and interacting with the world. It takes time for the disjuncture between values, beliefs, behaviors and norms of the host and home cultures to have a meaningful impact on the student.

References

Carmona, C. , van der Zee, K., & Oudenhoven, J. P. (2013). Competencias interculturales: aspecto clave para la internacionalización. Valencia: Universidadde Guadalajara y Universitat de València. Gupta, V., Hanges, P.J. & Dorfman, P. W. (2002). Cultural Clustering: Methodologies and findings. Journal of World Business, 37, 11-15. Leong, C. H. (2007). Predictive validity of the Multicultural Personality Questionnaire: A longitudinal study on the sociopsychological adaptation of Asian undergraduates who took part in a study-abroad program. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 31, 545–559. Oudenhoven, J. P., & Van der Zee, K. I. (2002). Predicting multicultural effectiveness of international students: The multicultural personality questionnaire. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 26, 679–694. Suanet, I. & Van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2009). Perceived Cultural Distance and Acculturation among Exchange Students in Russia. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 19, 182–197. Van der Zee, K. I., & Van Oudenhoven, J. P. (2000). The multicultural personality : A multidimensional instrument of multicultural effectiveness. European Journal of Personality, 14, 291–309. Van der Zee, K. I., & Van Oudenhoven, J. P. (2001). The multicultural personality questionnaire: Reliability and validity of self- and other ratings of multicultural effectiveness. Journal of Research in Personality, 35, 278–288. Vos, M., & Van der Zee, K. (2011). Prosocial behavior in diverse workgroups: How relational identity orientation shapes cooperation and helping. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14(3), 363-379. Ward, C. (1996). Acculturation. In D. Landis & R. Bhagat (Eds.), Handbook ofintercultural training (2nd ed.) (pp. 124-147). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Author Information

Carmen Carmona Rodríguez (presenting / submitting)
University of Valencia, Spain
University of Twente, The Netherlands
University of Groningen, The Netherlands
Hanze University of Applied Sciences, Groningen, The Netherlands

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.