Understanding Learning – Exploration of the use of Lesson Study as an approach to developing learning with International Masters students
Author(s):
Phil Wood (presenting / submitting) Wasyl Cajkler
Conference:
ECER 2013
Format:
Paper

Session Information

22 SES 13 A, Teaching, Learning and Assessment in Higher Education

Paper Session

Time:
2013-09-13
11:00-12:30
Room:
STD-301
Chair:
Jani Petri Ursin

Contribution

Originating from Japan and predominantly used by teachers within the school sector, ‘Lesson Study’ is a collaborative practitioner research activity, that has been the subject of a number of research studies in Japan, the USA and more recently the UK (Tall, 2008; Dudley, 2008; Ylonen and Norwich, 2012;). There have been claims that the approach is a very powerful dynamic approach to teacher education and development (Fernandez, 2002; Lewis & Tsuchida, 1997; Puchner & Taylor, 2006), but there has been much less exploration of its use and usefulness in the higher education sector.

In Higher Education settings, tutors engaged in lesson study identify a learning objective which relates to perceived learning deficits e.g. the development of academic literacy or reflective discussion skills or ability to critique research literature in English. With collaborating colleagues, tutors jointly plan seminars, teach and observe those seminars and then evaluate them together. Subjected to systematic analysis, the seminars are called ‘research’ or ‘study lessons’. 

International students often encounter a number of learning needs and barriers in the early months of post-graduate courses, particularly in relation to academic literacy skills such as analysing research papers, reflecting on evidence and developing referencing skills. This study focused on considering those needs and how they can be understood through lesson study research and then addressed through detailed discussion, planning and observation of seminars and lectures. By developing detailed understandings of the learning patterns of students, new insights can be gained, and new frameworks for learning can be developed to aid students to make rapid transitions to learning in new cultural environments. Consequently, the main aims of the research were to

1)      evaluate the quality of students’ learning opportunities in ‘research lesson’ seminars/lectures developed by lecturers who participated in Lesson Study;

2)      analyse students’ learning through the ‘research lesson’ seminars/lectures

3)      explore student perspectives on their learning experiences

4)      evaluate collaborative Lesson Study as a vehicle for the development of lecturers’ reflective practice.

This paper reports an innovative method for analysing and developing pedagogic practice with post-graduate students by transfer of a recognised pedagogical development tool from the school sector and working to demonstrate proof of concept in the higher education sector. As such, the paper reflects on the degree to which Lesson Study offers a reflective and developmental tool for those responsible for teaching, in particular with international students.

Method

The Lesson Study approach is based on deep discussion and development of learning events followed by implementation, reflection, alteration and re-implementation (if required). The Lesson Study took place in a post-graduate Masters module Contemporary Issues in Education within the School of Education, University of Leicester. This programme is predominantly populated by students from a number of countries and thus provided an international context for our use of Lesson Study to research pedagogy and learning. Two lecturers (the presenters) acted as the practitioners developing the ‘research lessons’. Five seminars were planned, taught and evaluated as ‘research lessons’. All planning and evaluation meetings were recorded and transcribed. All seminars were observed and recorded (filming and observation notes). Observations focused on a small number of case students (typically 2 to 3) who were also interviewed after each session using their notes as a focus for stimulated recall questions. Thematic data analysis of transcripts of all meetings was central to identifying the nature and kinds of lecturers’ talk that mediated their learning and knowledge creation, when jointly planning and evaluating the five research lessons. In addition analysis of student interviews allowed for deeper consideration of the learning dynamics of the seminars studied.

Expected Outcomes

Results demonstrate that Lesson Study encourages a deep consideration of learning and teaching in post-graduate seminars. Observation of student learning and post-seminar interviews highlighted the extremely complex nature of learning which unfolds in taught sessions. Post-seminar stimulated recall interviews with students allowed researchers to explore students’ processes of learning. Thematic analysis of student responses both during and after seminars highlighted several important issues: variation in approaches to participation in seminars, variable use of technologies to support learning, importance of differentiation in learning and types of task preferred by learners. Students were observed interacting with seminar materials and experiences in very different ways, often in ways that would not be visible to a tutor working alone. This led to reassessment of the pedagogic assumptions made by the academic participants and to the development of new pedagogic approaches. The results from this Higher Education Academy funded project strongly suggest that Lesson Study acts as a very positive vehicle for the study of learning in post-graduate seminar rooms. As such, it is an invaluable tool for aiding lecturers in developing critical and effective approaches to teaching and learning that are responsive to the needs of international students.

References

Dudley, P. (2008) Lesson Study development in England from school networks to national policy: the development of Lesson Study in England and its growing use as a professional learning process for the development and transfer of pedagogic practice. World Association of Lesson Studies annual conference, Hong Kong, December 2008. Fernandez, C. (2002). Learning from Japanese approaches to professional development: The case of lesson study. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(5), 393–405. Fernandez, C. Cannon, J. & Choksi, S. (2003) A US-Japan lesson study collaboration reveal critical lenses for examining practice. Teaching and Teacher Education 19 , 171–185 Lewis, C., & Tsuchida, I. (1997). Planned educational change in Japan: The case of elementary science instruction. Journal of Educational Policy, 12(5), 313–331. Parks, A.N. (2008) Messy learning: Preservice teachers’ lesson-study conversations about mathematics and students, Teaching and Teacher Education, 24 (2008) 1200–1216 Puchner, A. & Taylor, A.R. (2006) Lesson study, collaboration and teacher efficacy: Stories from two school-based math lesson study groups, Teaching and Teacher Education 22, 922–934 Tall, D. (2008) Using Japanese Lesson Study in Teaching Mathematics. The Scottish Mathematical Council Journal 38(1), 45-50. Ylonen, A. and Norwich B. (2012): Using Lesson Study to develop teaching approaches for secondary school pupils with moderate learning difficulties: teachers’ concepts, attitudes and pedagogic strategies, European Journal of Special Needs Education, 27(3), 301-317.

Author Information

Phil Wood (presenting / submitting)
University of Leicester
Leicester
University of Leicester, United Kingdom

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.