Implementation of Inclusive Education in Developing Countries: in the last ten years
Author(s):
Meenakshi Srivastava (presenting / submitting) Anke De Boer (presenting) Sipjan Pijl
Conference:
ECER 2013
Format:
Paper

Session Information

04 SES 07 A, Developing Inclusive Education

Paper Session

Time:
2013-09-11
17:15-18:45
Room:
D-505
Chair:
Hazel Lawson

Contribution

There is an increased global discussion on implementing inclusive education (Cooper and Jacobs, 2011), which has generated an interest amongst policymakers, researchers and practitioners on the questions of ‘how’ to make education inclusive. However, implementing inclusive education has diverse implications for different parts of the world, particularly between western or developed and developing countries (Armstrong, Armstrong and Spandagou, 2011). As Peters (2003) state, inclusive education may be implemented with different goals, based on different motives, reflecting different classifications of SEN and providing services within different contexts. In the western world, issues are mainly related to efforts in phasing out special schooling for students with SEN and their inclusion in regular education. However, for the developing world a central issue is providing Education for All (EFA), when some 140 million students do not attend school (UNESCO, 2005).

In western countries, Pijl and Meijer (1997) have suggested three broad factors in implementing inclusive education: a) external: (e.g. legislation and funding), b) school factor: (providing special services in schools and the support system), c) teacher: (attitude, knowledge, skills). Few studies have pointed out the role of parents and local communities in scaling up inclusive practices (Alur, 2010) with research in developing countries remaining significantly limited.

It is important to remember that due to difference in context and backgrounds, developing countries have different sets of factors, actors and pace in making education inclusive. Efforts have been made under the flagships of international and local organisations on those lines in developing countries, however, not much is known about their effects. This leads to a serious gap regarding the effects of these concrete actions on inclusive education. We argue that if the efforts undertaken were known to be effective, via empirical evidence, in increasing the numbers of students with SEN in regular schools then these efforts could be replicated in other developing countries. Therefore, this study answers the questions: 1) What concrete actions at policy, school, teacher and parents/public level have been taken to make education inclusive for students with SEN in developing countries? 2) What are the effects of these actions in including students with SEN in regular schools of developing countries?

Method

A literature study was set up in order to answer the research questions. Relevant literature from last ten years was searched in electronic database of EBSCOhost, also journals, reports of the organisations were manually searched. The selection criteria applied for first question were: 1.1) peer reviewed studies or (non) peer reviewed reports from international organisations; 1.2) regular elementary schools; 1.3) actions pertaining to implementing inclusive education in medium and low ranking countries on the Human Development Index (UNDP, 2011). One more criterion was added to answer the second question. 2.1) studies reporting the implementation effect in the country concerned in terms of an increase in the number of students with SEN attending regular schools before and after the action was undertaken. The search resulted in 106 relevant studies and 51 reports. After applying selection criteria a total number of 15 studies/reports were selected for the first research question, two of them remained for the second research question.

Expected Outcomes

Regarding the first question, it was found that several studies describe actions taken pertaining to external, school, teacher or parent factors. Regarding external factors, several developing countries have revised their legislation and educational polices in line with international guidelines for inclusive education. Studies revealed unclear roles and responsibilities of government departments, thereby creating confusion and inaction. Studies also indicated a lack of information about legislation, disabilities and services available among the general public. Regarding school factors, several studies showed local school initiatives making a head start by opening their doors to students with SEN. The studies also showed collaborative efforts of local government, local and international organisations in preparing schools by formulating school policy, training teachers and developing teaching materials. Regarding the teacher factor, few studies mentioned teachers training yet several studies indicated teachers not having adequate knowledge and skills for including students with SEN. Moreover, parental involvement of children with SEN in education is lacking. Regarding second research question, a significant finding is that only two studies revealed an increased number of students with SEN attending regular schools as the positive effect of action undertaken.

References

Alur.M. (2010). Family perspectives- parents in partnerships. Nasen, Armstrong, D., Armstrong, A. C., & Spandagou, I. (2011). Inclusion: By choice or by chance? International Journal of Inclusive Education, 15(1), 29-39. Cooper, P., & Jacob, B. (2011). From inclusion to engagement . West Sussex, U.K: Willey-blackwell. Peters, S. J. (2003). Inclusive education: Achieving education for all by including those with disabilities and special education needsThe World Bank. Retrieved http://www.inclusioneducativa.org/content/documents/Peters_Inclusive_Education.pdf Pijl, S. J., & Meijer, C. J. W. (1997). Factors in inclusion: A framework. In S. J. Pijl, & Meijer, C.J.W, and Hegarty. S (Eds.), Inclusive education - a global agenda (pp. 8-13). London: Routledge. UNDP. (2011) United Nations Development Programme. Retrieved 15 June, 2012. http://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/librarypage/hdr/human_developmentreport2011/ UNESCO. (2005). Guidelines for inclusion: Ensuring access to education for all No. (ED-2004/WS/39 cld 17402) UNESCO.

Author Information

Meenakshi Srivastava (presenting / submitting)
University of Groningen, Netherlands, The
Anke De Boer (presenting)
University of Groningen, Netherlands, The
University of Groningen, Netherlands, The

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.