Processes of Translation and Transformation in the Conduct of Collaborative Practitioner Research Projects in Schools.
Author(s):
Jenny Reeves (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2013
Format:
Paper

Session Information

15 SES 06, A Collaborative Way

Paper Session

Time:
2013-09-11
15:30-17:00
Room:
D-314
Chair:
Philippe Masson

Contribution

Attempts at modernising teaching practice to support a revision of school education are occurring in a number of countries as part of the lifelong learning agenda (European Commission 2002; OECD 2005).The lifelong learning discourse promulgates a switch from a didactic, ‘schooling’ tradition of teaching to a more constructivist, ‘developmental’ approach (Usher & Edwards 2007) that requires an alteration in teachers’ conceptualisation of their role and practice.  A change in professional identity that entails teachers enabling pupils to build and create knowledge for themselves (Drew & Mackie 2011, Priestley et al 2012) rather than transmitting knowledge for them to absorb. At the same time there has been a movement towards engaging established teachers in collaborative practitioner research as part of a pragmatic, practice-based approach to enhancing teachers' professional knowledge and skills (Cochran-Smith & Lytle 2009). This paper reports on the findings of a study of eighteen practitioner research projects carried out, as part of a Master's programme: Professional Enquiry in Education (the MEd), by aspiring chartered teachers in Scotland. These enquiries were completed between May 2010 - June 2011. They were therefore carried out in the context of; the implementation of a constructivist curriculum, the Curriculum for Excellence (Scottish Executive 2004, Scottish Government 2006-2010) and the continuing operation of a quality assurance regime introduced in the late 1990s that has become increasingly focused on measures of attainment (Reeves 2008).

 

The paper explores evidence, contained in the reports and portfolios submitted by students, as to how the various 'tools' made accessible to them on the MEd programme were mobilised, both in their classrooms and in the wider context of their schools. It looks at how the discourse of professional enquiry used on the MEd programme (Buchanan & Redford 2008) interacted with other discourses that permeated these students' work settings. The methods used in the analysis focus on the discursive and material relations created across social spaces as students undertook the work-based enquiries which were an integral part of their postgraduate programme. The study highlights how the discourse, and associated tools, of practitioner research and enquiry were translated in the eighteen different school contexts as part of the performance of the MEd (Latour 1999, Reeves 2010). The purpose of the study was to apply a new perspective for exploring questions about the impact and sustainability of attempts to influence teaching practice through the use of practitioner research by focusing on the social dynamics of the activity.

Method

Nine of the practitioner research projects were carried out by teachers in their own classrooms whilst the other nine involved two or more teachers working on a joint investigation. The data for the study consisted of: • taped, semi-structured interviews with the MEd students concerned, and, in the case of collaborative enquiries, field notes of interviews with a colleague involved in the project and a school manager; • reports on the enquiries written by the students • the portfolios of evidence submitted with these reports - containing primary and secondary evidence re: pupils etc. The analysis of the student interviews, the reports and portfolios was carried out separately but under the same broad headings: linkages, classroom and enquiry processes, curriculum, and professional learning. The category “linkages” (Horn & Lytle, 2010) related to evidence of the involvement of ideas, objects, processes and persons that the teachers found noteworthy. These linkages included only those theoretical formulations which were substantively incorporated into the students’ accounts, thus references used solely as part of the genre of academic report writing were excluded. Each case was analysed separately to establish an inclusive delineation of the case including the timescale and events comprising the enquiry.

Expected Outcomes

The discussion of the results of the analysis focuses on: • the contest between long-standing conceptions of the teacher as transmitter of knowledge and the teacher as mediator of learning made manifest in a) the alteration of roles and relations (Bernstein 2000) b) the creation of capability gaps for teachers and their pupils • the contest between professionalism/managerialism revealed in a) the challenge to managerial knowledge presented by professional and work process knowledge b) the contrasts between practitioner research/enquiry and school improvement planning c) the tensions centring around accountability and autonomy and collaboration and compliance (Drew et al 2008, Leander & Osborne 2008). The intervention of collaborative practitioner research into the eighteen schools serves both to reveal these contestations in the teachers’ attempts to secure ‘new’ practices and also some of hybridisations that occur as part of the interaction between various discursive elements in the course of these endeavours (Alcadipani & Hassard 2010). The paper considers what the results reveal about the potentialities of collaborative practitioner research as a vehicle for developing professional practice.

References

Alcadipani,R. & Hassard,J. (2010) Actor-Network Theory, organisations and critique: towards a politics of organising. Organization 17(4) 419-435 Bernstein, B.B. 2000.Pedagogy, Symbolic Control and Identity: theory, research, critique (revised edition). Lanham Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers Inc. Cochran-Smith, M. & Lytle, S. 2009. Inquiry as Stance. New York: Teachers College Press. Drew, V.M., Fox, A. & McBride, M. 2008 Collaborating to improve learning and teaching. In Practice-Based Learning: developing excellence in teaching eds J. Reeves & A. Fox, 52-56. Edinburgh: Dunedin Academic Press. European Commission (2002). A European Area of Lifelong Learning. Brussels: European Commission. Horn I S & Little J.W. (2010) Attending to problems of practice: routines and resources for professional learning in teachers’ workplace interactions American Educational Research Journal 47(1):181-217. Latour, B. (1999). Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Camb. Mass: Harvard University Press. Leander,K.M. & Osborne,M.D. (2008) Complex positioning: teachers as agents of curricular and pedagogical reform.Journal of Curriculum Studies. 40(1)23-46 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2005. Teachers Matter. Paris: OECD. Priestley,M., Robinson,S. & Biesta,G.(2012) Reinventing the Teacher in the Scottish Curriculum for Excellence Chapter in Teacher Agency, Performativity and Curriculum Change., Reeves,J. (2010) Professional Learning as Relational Practice. Dordrecht: Springer Reeves,J. 2008 Between a Rock and a Hard Place? Curriculum for Excellence and the Quality Initiative in Scottish Schools. Scottish Education Review 40(2)6-16 Scottish Executive (2004) A Curriculum for Excellence. Edinburgh: SE Scottish Government (2011) Teaching Scotland’s Future: Report of a Review of Teacher Education in Scotland. Edinburgh: SG Scottish Government (2006 - 2010) A Curriculum for Excellence: Building the Curriculum 1-5 Edinburgh: SG Usher, R. and Edwards, R. 2007. Lifelong Learning – Signs, Discourses, Practices. Dordrecht: Springer.

Author Information

Jenny Reeves (presenting / submitting)
University of Stirling, United Kingdom

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.