International collaboration in professional development programs to promote school-based curriculum development in China: a case from Gansu province
Author(s):
Wout Ottevanger (presenting / submitting) Henk Frencken (presenting) Dineke Tigelaar
Conference:
ECER 2013
Format:
Paper

Session Information

03 SES 06 A, Optimizing Sustainable Curriculum Reform

Paper Session

Time:
2013-09-11
15:30-17:00
Room:
D-402
Chair:
Jan van den Akker

Contribution

Since China’s basic reform in 2001, many teachers in China have participated in professional development programs in the context of international or cross-cultural collaboration (e.g., Ryan, et al., 2009). China’s basic reform involves new curriculum goals that are aimed at developing ‘new’ types of learners (Paine & Fang, 2006). Students need to gain competences that go beyond ‘basic’ knowledge and skills, by engaging them in critical and creative thinking and problem solving, which they can apply to various real-life situations. Teachers need to be able to support students in meeting these new curriculum goals. Teachers are also expected to be able to develop lesson materials that fit with the needs of their own students and that they can use to supplement the available textbooks. This means that teachers also need to develop skills in school-based curriculum development.

In the past few years, many Chinese and Western scholars have collaborated in order to develop professional development programs that support teachers in China to acquire the knowledge and skills that are necessary in the context of China’s new curriculum aims and to develop skills in school-based curriculum development (Mitchell, et al., 2007). Earlier studies into teacher professional development in China in the context of international and cross-cultural collaboration have provided indications that ideas about teacher professional development and student learning can cross cultural systems (Ryan, et al., 2009). Such research has also provided insight in characteristics of effective and

sustainable curriculum reform that can be built through collaborative models, such as: giving consideration to local contexts and individual teacher agency through teacher-led research supported by school leaders and university academics (Ryan, et al., 2009). However, more research is needed with regard to the characteristics of professional development programs in the context of international collaboration and how these characteristics relate to what and how participants learn (cf. Borko, et al., 2010). Such research needs to take into account context characteristics, such as school characteristics (Van Veen, et al., 2010) and characteristics of the formal educational system and its developments. Such research may inform conceptualizations of both teacher learning and student learning  (Desimone, 2009; Van Veen, et al., 2010).

Given the growth of interest in the aforementioned issues, in 2009, a professional development project was started in which Chinese and Dutch scholars collaborated. The project was aimed at supporting Chinese teachers to acquire competences needed in the context of China’s reform of basic education in general and school-based curriculum development, in particular. The research was carried out in rural areas of Gansu province, China, since in these areas, teacher development and school development is especially needed (Sargent, 2009). The purpose of the current research is to explore the characteristics of professional development programs in the context of international collaboration that can support teacher professional learning. The specific research questions is:

What and how do participants learn with regard to school-based curriculum development when participating in a professional development program in the context of international collaboration?

Method

Participants: Seven Chinese University scholars and five Dutch scholars participated in the research. These scholars were specialized in educational theory, curriculum development, teacher education and related fields of research . Furthermore, 25 teachers from three different secondary schools participated. These teachers taught different subjects, such as mathematics, English, biology, etc. Approach: The teacher professional development program consisted of three different phases: 1) a school based orientation; 2) a school based intervention; 3) a school based implementation. From each school a interdisciplinary team of teachers attended a series of five workshops, held at North West Normal University in Gansu. In between the workshops the teams performed research in their own schools, and designed, implemented and evaluated new forms of ‘localized curriculum’ for their schools. This program also was the ‘training ground’ for the Chinese scholars, who were trained in supporting teachers in developing new knowledge and skills through action research, focused on curriculum development. Teachers worked in small groups on their action research projects. Procedure and instruments: The following data were collected: on participants’ knowledge and skills (questionnaires), on school characteristics (questionnaires), teachers’ research plans and research writings, focus group interviews. Data were supplemented with field notes from observations.

Expected Outcomes

Only the most relevant results will be presented. The scholars (both Chinese and Dutch) in particular improved their insights into similarities and differences with regard to Western and Chinese ideas on the relation between school environment and effective professional development, e.g., with regard to the role of the school leader, the function of selecting exemplary teachers, etc. They also struggled with a number of issues to effectively connect to the teachers and the schools, such as: translating evidence-based findings into ‘knowledge for practice’, and developing routines to support the development of teachers’ expertise through reflective, self-directed learning. In all three school based teacher groups, the teachers, in their action research, collaborated in such a way that they gained a lot of insight in students’ needs and students’ learning processes. Teachers participating in the project also gained experience and confidence as ‘change agents’, and had a clear impact on the school’s educational practices and climate, mostly so in those schools where there was a clear support for the process from the school leadership.

References

Borko, H., Jacobs, J., & Koellner, K. (2010). Contemporary approaches to teacher professional development. In P. L. Peterson, E. Baker, & B. McGaw (Eds.), Third international encyclopedia of education (Vol. 7, pp. 548–556). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier. Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199. Mitchell, I., Ryan, J., Kang, C.Y., & Erickson, G. (2007, April). Role of teacher research and crosscultural collaboration in the context of curriculum reform in China. Paper presented at the International Conference on Teacher Research, Chicago. Paine, L., & Fang, Y.P. (2006). Reform as hybrid model of teaching and teacher development inChina. International Journal of Education Research, 45, 279–289. Ryan, J., Kang, C., Mitchell, I., & Erickson, G. (2009). China's basic education reform: an account of an international collaborative research and development project. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 29(4), 427-441. Sargent , Tanja C. & Hannum, Emily (2009). Doing More With Less. Teacher Professional Learning Communities in Resource-Constrained Primary Schools in Rural China. Journal of Teacher Education, 60, 258-276. Van Veen, K., Zwart, R., Meirink, J., & Verloop, N. (2010). Professional development of teachers: a review study on the effective characteristics of professional interventions of teachers. (Professionele ontwikkeling van leraren: een reviewstudie naar effectieve kenmerken van professionaliseringsinterventies van leraren). Leiden: ICLON/ Expertisecentrum: Leren van Docenten.

Author Information

Wout Ottevanger (presenting / submitting)
SLO Netherlands Institute for curriculum development
Enschede
Henk Frencken (presenting)
ICLON University of Leiden, Netherlands
ICLON University of Leiden, Netherlands

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.