A study of primary school teacher leadership in Taiwan
Author(s):
Conference:
ECER 2008
Format:
Poster

Session Information

MC_Poster, Poster Session; Main Conference

All Poster are presented in the two Poster Sessions of ECER 2008: - 11 September 12.15 - 13.15 and - 12 September 12.15 - 13.15

Time:
2008-09-11
12:15-13:15
Room:
Poster Exhibition Area
Chair:

Contribution

With implementing educational reform of schools in Taiwan, teachers need to have more participation and take more responsibility in curriculum, instruction and organization. Therefore, the roles of teachers are changed dramatically. Teachers can’t continue to serve as the followers but should assume the roles of teacher leaders. Actually, the teachers have been playing the roles since educational reform. However, they still have ambiguity about what is the teacher leadership and how to play the roles of teacher leaders better. Therefore, this study aims to explore the connotations and influential factors of teacher leadership in Taiwanese primary schools by reviewing the literature about teacher rsearch, distributed leadershipand participative leadership and analyzing the positive data from interview, panel discussion and questionnaire survey.

Method

For the above objectives, the researcher will collect the primary school educators’ opinions of teacher leadership implementation in Taiwan. The major methods of data collection include interview, panel discussion and questionnaire survey. Data of interview are collected from 30 teacher leaders in primary schools by using interview protocol. The panel discussion will be conducted through the question about teacher leadersip to collect opinions from 20 participants' discussion including 5 scholars, 3 principasl, 5 teacher leaders and 7 primary school teachers. Questionnaire surveys are used to collect data from 1270 educators of public primary schools in Taiwan.

Expected Outcomes

After data analysis and discussions, the results will indicate the findings about characteristics, functions, roles, approaches, and influential factors of teacher leadership and provide the beneficial suggestions of five dimensions involving teacher learning, teacher-teacher interaction, teacher-student interaction, organizational restructure, and resource rearrangement for improvement of primary school teacher leadership in Taiwan.

References

Acker-Hocevar, M., & Touchton, D. (1999). A model of power as social relationships: Teacher leaders describe the phenomena of effective agency in practice. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Barth, R. S. (2001). Teacher leader. Phi Delta Kappan, 82, 443-449. Buckner, K. G., & McDowelle, J. O. (2000). Developing teacher leaders: Providing encouragement, opportunities, and support. NASSP Bulletin, 84(616), 35-41. Caine, G., & Caine, R. N. (2000). The learning community as a foundation for developing teacher leaders. NASSP Bulletin, 84(616), 7-14. Center for Research on the Context of Teaching. (2000). Assessing results: Bay Area School Reform Collaborative—Year 4. Stanford, CA: Center for Research on the Context of Teaching, Stanford University. Childs-Bowen, D., Moller, G., & Scrivner, J. (2000). Principals: Leaders of leaders. NASSP Bulletin, 84(616), 27-34. Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1998). Teacher research: The question that persists. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 1, 19-36. Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1999a). Relationships of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning in communities. In A. Iran-Nejad & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Review of Research in Education, 24 (pp. 249- 305). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association. Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1999b). The teacher research movement: A decade later. Educational Researcher, 28(7), 15-25. Copland, M. A. (2001). Shared school leadership: Moving from role to function in an inquiry-based model of school reform. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA. Coyle, M. (1997). Teacher leadership vs. school management: Flatten the hierarchies. The Clearing House, 70, 236-239. Crow, G. M., & Pounder, D. G. (2000). Interdisciplinary teacher teams: Context, design, and process. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36, 216-254. Crowther, F., Kaagen, S. S., Ferguson, M., & Hann, L. (2002). Developing teacher leaders: How teacher leadership enhances school success. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. Corbett, H. D. (1991). Community influence and school micropolitics: A case example. In The politics of life in schools: Power, conflict, and cooperation, ed. J. Blase, 73-95. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Corwin Press. Darling-Hammond, L. (1988). Policy and professionalism. In A. Lieberman (Ed.), Building a professional culture in schools (pp. 55- 77). New York: Teachers College Press. Darling-Hammond, L., Bullmaster, M. L., & Cobb, V. L. (1995). Rethinking teacher leadership through professional development schools. Elementary School Journal, 96, 87-106. Darling-Hammond, L. (1997). The right to learn: A blueprint for creating schools that work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Deal, T. E., & Peterson, K. D. (1998). Shaping school culture: The heart of leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Dierks, K., Dillard, S., McElliot, K., Morgan, J., Schultz, B., Tipps, L., & Walentine, K. (1988). Teacher leadership: Commitment and challenge. Seattle: University of Washington, Puget Sound, Educational Consortium. Duke, D. L. (1994). Drift, detachment, and the need for teacher leadership. In D. R. Walling (Ed.), Teachers as leaders: Perspectives on the professional development of teachers (pp. 255- 273). Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation. Duke, D. L., Showers, B. K., & Imber, M. (1980). Teachers and shared decision making: The costs and benefits of involvement. Educational Administration Quarterly, 16, 93-106. Fessler, R., & Ungaretti, A. (1994). Expanding opportunities for teacher leadership. In D. R. Walling (Ed.), Teachers as leaders (pp. 211- 222). Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation. Fullan, M. G. (1998). Teacher leadership: A failure to conceptualize. In D. R. Walling (Ed.), Teachers as leaders (pp. 241-253). Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation. Fullan, M. G. (2001). The new meaning of educational change (3rd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press. Guiney, E. (2001). Coaching isn't just for athletes: The role of teacher leaders. Phi Delta Kappan, 82, 740-743. Firestone, W. A., & Bader, B. D. (1992). Redesigning teaching: Professionalism or bureaucracy? Albany, NY: SUNY Press. Fullan, M. (2001). The new meaning of educational change (3rd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press. Fullan, M., & Hargreaves, A. (1992). Teacher development and educational change. In M. Fullan & A. Hargreaves (Eds.), Teacher development and educational change. London: Falmer Press. Gates, G. S., & Siskin, D. (2001). Principal leadership styles and attitudes toward shared decision making with teachers. Planning and Changing, 32, 164-183. Griffin, G. A. (1995). Influences of shared decision making on school and classroom activity: Conversations with five teachers. Elementary School Journal, 96, 29-45. Griffin, G. A., Lieberman, A., & Jacullo-Noto, J. (1983). Interactive research and development on schooling: Executive summary of final report. Austin: University of Texas, Research and Development for Teacher Education. Hart, A. W. (1994). Creating teacher leadership roles. Educational Administration Quarterly, 30(4), 472-497. Hackman, J. R. (1990). Groups that work (and those that don’t). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Hackman, J. R. (1998). Why teams don’t work. In R. S. Tinsdale et al. (Eds.), Theory and research on small groups (pp. 245-267). New York: Plenum. Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1980). Work redesign. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Hart, A. W. (1994). Creating teacher leadership roles. Educational Administration Quarterly, 30, 472-497. Henson, K. T. (1996). Teachers as researchers. In J. Sikula, T. J. Buttery, & E. Guyton (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 53-64). New York: Macmillan. Institute for Educational Leadership. (2001). Leadership for student learning: Redefining the teacher as leader. Washington, DC: Author. Kahrs, J. R. (1996). Principals who support teacher leadership. New Directions for School Leadership, 1, 19-40. Katzenmeyer, M., & Moller, G. (2001). Awakening the sleeping giant: Helping teachers develop as leaders (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. Keedy, T., & Finch, A. (1994). Examining teacher principal empowerment: An analysis of power. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 27, 162-173. Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2000). The effects of different sources of leadership on student engagement in school. In K. A. Riley & K. S. Louis (Eds.), Leadership for change and school reform: International perspectives (pp. 50-66). New York: Routledge/Falmer. Lieberman, A. (1992). Teacher leadership: What are we learning? In C. Livingston (Ed.), Teachers as leaders: Evolving roles (pp. 159-165). Washington, DC: National Education Association of the United States. Lieberman, A., & Miller, L. (1999). Teachers: Transforming their world and their work. New York: Teachers College Press. Lieberman, A., Saxl, E. R., & Miles, M. B. (1992). Teacher leadership: Ideology and practice. In A. Lieberman (Ed.), Building a professional culture in schools (pp. 148-166). New York: Teachers College Press. Lichtenstein, G., McLaughlin, M. W., & Knudsen, J. (1992). Teacher empowerment and professional knowledge. In A. Lieberman (Ed.), The changing contexts of teaching. Ninety-first yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part I (pp. 3758). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education. Little, J. W. (1988). Assessing the prospects for teacher leadership. In A. Lieberman (Ed.), Building a professional culture in schools (pp. 78-106). New York: Teachers College Press. Livingston, C. (1992). Teacher leadership for restructured schools. In C. Livingston (Ed.), Teachers as leaders: Evolving roles (pp. 9-20). Washington, DC: National Education Association of the United States. Neuman, M., & Simmons, W. (2000). Leadership for student learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 82, 8-12. Newmann, F. M., & Wehlage, G. G. (1995). Successful school restructuring. Madison: Center on Organization and Restructuring of Schools, University of Wisconsin. Ogawa, R. T., & Bossert, S. T. (1995). Leadership as an organizational quality. Educational Administration Quarterly, 31, 224-243. Ovando, M. N. (1996). Teacher leadership: Opportunities and challenges. Planning and Changing, 27, 30-44. Neuman, M., & Simmons, W. (2000). Leadership for student learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 82, 8-12. Newmann, F. M., & Wehlage, G. G. (1995). Successful school restructuring. Madison: Center on Organization and Restructuring of Schools, University of Wisconsin. Ogawa, R. T., & Bossert, S. T. (1995). Leadership as an organizational quality. Educational Administration Quarterly, 31, 224-243. Ovando, M. N. (1996). Teacher leadership: Opportunities and challenges. Planning and Changing, 27, 30-44. Sheu, Terng-Ji(2001). The construction of power in school organization. Taipei: The Fifth Nan publication (in Chinese) Sheu, Terng-Ji(2005). A study on the indicator construction of teaching supervisor competences(2nd ed.). Taipei: Su Da publication (in Chinese) Troen, V., & Boles, K. (1994). Two teachers examine the power of teacher leadership. In D. R. Walling (Ed.), Teachers as leaders: Perspectives on the professional development of teachers (pp. 275- 286). Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation. York-Barr, J.& Duke, K(2004). What Do We Know About Teacher Leadership? Findings From Two Decades of Scholarship. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 255-316. Yukl, G. (1998). Leadership in organizations (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Author Information

National Taiwan Ocean University
Institute of Education and Teacher Education Center
Taipei County
215

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.