"… the aim is not the absurd one of making disagreement and error disappear." (Donald Davidson Inquiries into Truth and Meaning, 2001, p. 153) Institutions worldwide respond to the need to recognise the value of educating children and young people to handle or solve conflicts in communication. But how do they or we know that an event is correctly interpreted as a conflict? How can people analyse the quality of deliberation when handling or solving conflicts in communication in education? I discuss these questions and argue that the notion of conflict cannot be defined only in terms of incompatibility, clash, opposition and/or disagreement; it also has to encompass negativity in the approach to the other. I also argue that the quality of deliberation can be analysed through a deliberative pedagogical approach, which takes into account structural features of deliberation and required dispositions of the participants, and that our knowledge of conflicts emerges holistically and is interpersonal and objective. I begin by giving an account of some institutional responses to conflicts. Then I discuss the notion of conflict and define it, inter alia, in terms of incompatibility, disagreement and negativity. Finally, I discuss ideas for analysing the quality of deliberation in communication when handling or solving conflicts in education.It is an analytical philosophical approach to various institutional responses to conflicts and theories of conflict management, and the sources I analyse are common theories of conflict management. The paper draws on the work of the philosopher of language Donald Davidson.See Descprition. References to the paper (to be continued below) Borradori, Giovanna (2003) Philosophy in a Time of Terror. Dialogues with Jürgen Habermas and Jacques Derrida. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Byman, Daniel L. (2002) Keeping the Peace: Lasting Solutions to Ethnic Conflicts. London: The Johns Hopkins University Press. Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms within the European Union. Council of Europe. Davidson, Donald (2001a) The Second Person. In Subjective, Intersubjective, Objective. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 107-121. Davidson, Donald (2001b) Three Varieties of Knowledge. In Subjective, Intersubjective, Objective. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 205-220. Davidson, Donald (2001c) Belief and the Basis of Meaning. In Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, pp. 141-154. Davidson, Donald (2001d) Communication and Convention. In Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 265-280. Davidson, Donald (2004) Expressing Evaluations. In Problems of Rationality. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 19-37. Davidson, Donald (2005) A Nice Derangement of Epitaphs. In Truth, Language and History. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 89-107. Deutsch, Morton & Coleman Peter T. (Eds.) (2000) The Handbook of Conflict Resolution. Theory and Practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers. EUMC, (2003) Majority Populations' Attitudes towards Migrants and Minorities: Report for European Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia. Feinberg, Walter (2006) Religious Schools and Education for Democratic Citizenry. New York: Routledge. Foolger, J. P., Poole, M. S., & Stutman, R. K. (2005) Working through Conflict: Strategies for Relationships, Groups, and Organizations (5th ed.). Boston: Pearson. Glüer-Pagin, Kathrin (2001) Dreams and Nightmares: Conventions, Norms and Meaning in Davidson's Philosophy of Language. I Petr Kotatko, Peter Pagin & Gabriel Segal (Eds.) Interpreting Davidson, Stanford: CSLI Publications, s. 53-74. Habermas, Jürgen 2003: A Dialogue with Jürgen Habermas. In Giovanna Borradori (Ed.) Philosophy in a Time of Terror. Dialogues with Jürgen Habermas and Jacques Derrida. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 25-81. Habermas, Jürgen (2005) Concluding Comments on Empirical Approaches to Deliberative Politics. In Acta Politica Empirical Approaches to Deliberative Democracy, Vol 40, Issue 3, pp. 384-392. Jeong, Ho-Won (Ed.) (1999) Conflict Resolution: Dynamics, Process and Structure. Aldershot: Ashgate. Kahane, David (2003) In Theory - Dispute Resolution and the Politics of Cultural Generalization. In Negotiation Journal, Vol 19, Issue 1, pp. 5-27. Muhammeds ansigt (The Face of Mohammed). In Jyllands-Posten, Avisen, Kulturweekend, 30 September (2005), p. 3. Oetzel, John G. & Ting-Toomey, Stella (Eds.) (2006) The Sage Handbook of Conflict Communication. Integrating Theory, Research, and Practice. London: Sage Publications. Roth, Klas (2004) Deliberativ pedagogik och deliberativa samtal som värderingsprocedur (Deliberative Pedagogy and Deliberative Communication as an Evaluative Procedure). In Rune Premfors and Klas Roth (Eds.) Deliberativ demokrati (Deliberative Democracy) Lund: Studentlitteratur, pp. 77-114. Roth, Klas (2006) Truth, Justification and Deliberation. In Pradeep Dhillon (Ed.) Philosophy of Language and Education. Blackwell (forthcoming) Smith, P. K (2003) Violence in Schools: The Response in Europe. London: Routledgefalmer. Steiner, Jürg Bächtiger, André Spörndli, Markus & Steenbergen, Marco R. (2004) Deliberative Politics in Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. UNESCO Inter-Agency Peace Education Programme. Published by UNESCO.Utbildnings- och kulturdepartementet (Ministry of Education, Research and Culture) (2005), Trygghet, respekt och ansvar (Safety, Respect and Responsibility). Published by Regeringskansliet. Wallensten, Peter (2006) Understanding Conflict Resolution: War Peace and the Global System. London: Sage Publications. Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1958/1984) Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1978) Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1981) Zettel. Oxford: Blackwell. Studies in Philosphy and Education