A walk through the ages: Stakeholder perspectives of school, people and space.
Author(s):
Jonathon Sargeant (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2014
Format:
Paper

Session Information

25 SES 01, Stakeholder Perspectives (Part 1)

Paper Session: to be continued in 25 SES 02

Time:
2014-09-02
13:15-14:45
Room:
B034 Anfiteatro
Chair:
John I'Anson

Contribution

When adults think of childhood, many notions are conjured about freedom, space, social interaction, neighbourhood and family. However school, the environment, the location and the institution that constitute the single most dominant feature of childhood from as early as the age of four to at least 16 is often absent from these general reminiscences, perhaps because it remains the environment where children are afforded the least opportunity to assert any personal control over that system. How the educational experience shapes and is shaped by children’s perspectives receive relatively little attention when compared with the perspectives of the adults present in a school community. While many studies present discussions of the challenges facing children and youth, few seek to determine the features of childhood that children value highly, particularly in terms of what it is that helps children to feel positive about their world.

This paper considers the school experiences of key stakeholders, those whose main interests lay within that institution; the leaders, the teachers, the parents and the students. Exploring these viewpoints provides some insight into the ecology of the school a diversity of perception and from a children’s rights perspective identify the conditions that either activate or stifle children’s active participation in an institution solely provided in the name of their best interest. This may be due to adults' view that children have few insights to offer educational reform. This study will provide educators with information that will advise their practice in the provision of services for children from a range of unique perspectives.

Method

Guided by a semi structured interview design participant were asked to both show and tell the features of their school that best represent the key themes of learning, socializing and achievement in order to identify how and where the perspectives of school community members align and diverge regarding the schooling experience. For example it is one thing to ask a teacher, “what is learning” and a very different task for a teacher to show “what learning is”. Even considering the differences in a written, or oral description of learning, the visual representation of the same concept of learning reveals some insights in how the teacher brings that notion “to life”. The challenge of “telling” verses “showing” is intriguing in itself but consider then how a child, in the same context, under the same conditions as the teacher views that same concept. The child as the recipient of the teacher’s instruction framed by the teachers conceptualization of “what is learning” may provide some very different commentary. Would the child identify with “learning” in the same way as the teacher? Would the child “show” a learning event that matches the teacher’s “show” of learning? The notions of learning and teaching are embedded constructs that while continually evolving are represented by a number of commonly agreed principles. In the context of the schooling experience, a number of other constructs, particularly in the affective domain are represented more idiosyncratically depending on the perspective of the experience. Considering these affectations, what would each stakeholder nominate if asked to “show” these on a tour of the school. Would other stakeholder agree? In this study, children are offered an opportunity to express themselves and have their individual perspective considered in direct alignment with those of other stakeholders in the school expereince. By adopting a hermeneutic method of analysis the individuals voices are heard, even within the context of identified emergent themes. Through hermeneutics, the researcher can engage in the process of arriving at understanding, especially through language (Palmer 1969). In a hermeneutic methodology, it is not the communication of meaning as such, but the open-ended nature of communication in which we continually gain access to the world in which we live that provides illumination in a study such as this (Risser 1997:17).

Expected Outcomes

The hermeneutic philosophy of interpretation allows for meaning to emerge from the data with analysis devoted to making sense of the emergent themes rather than applying restrictions to achieve conclusive determinations (Denzin & Lincoln 2003:302) (Dowling 2004, Ormiston & Schrift 1990). To answer these, each stakeholder in the school experience should have the opportunity to “show” through their conceptualisation what each look like so that each can consider the perspectives of the “other” key players in the school experience. Education is a field that is in a state of continued evolution. New practices are developed as societal values and priorities change, and for it to remain effective and relevant to contemporary society; educational change relies on new ideas and innovation. Such innovation includes a responsive curriculum, improved teaching strategies, embracing technologies, communication, and management. Often the adoption of these innovations by educational institutions occurs without supporting evidence from research. This paper will present the key and emergent themes as reported by the stakeholder interviews. The alignment and divergence of expressed views on the school experience will be discussed with to explore the extent to which children can contribute a perspective to a school ecology that is infrequently accessed.

References

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education (6th ed.). London; New York: Routledge. Cook-Sather, A. (2002). Authorizing Students' Perspectives. Educational Researcher, 31(4), 3-14. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2003). The landscape of qualitative research : theories and issues (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage. Doyle, W. (1986). Classroom Organisation and Management. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching (3rd ed., pp. 392-427). New York: Macmillan. Freeman, M. (2010). Why it remains important to take children's rights seriously. In J. Rix, M. Nind, K. Sheehy, K. Simmons & C. Walsh (Eds.), Equality, Participation and Inclusion 1: Diverse Perspectives (2 ed., pp. 99-105). Abingdon: Routledge. Graham, A., & Fitzgerald, R. (2010). Children's participation in research : Some possi- bilities and constraints in the current Australian research environment. Journal of So- ciology, 46(2), 133-147. Harcourt, D., & Sargeant, J. (2011). The challenges of conducting ethical research with children. Education Inquiry, 2(3). Heng, T. T. (2011). Children's lives, children's futures: a study of children starting sec- ondary school. Teacher Development, 15(2), 267-269. Komulainen, S. (2007). The Ambiguity of the Child's 'Voice' in Social Research. Child- hood, 14(1), 11-28. Lundy, L. (2007). 'Voice' is not enough: conceptualising Article 12 of the United Na- tions Convention on the Rights of the Child. British Educational Research Journal, 33(6), 927-942. Riley, K., & Docking, J. (2004). Voices of Disaffected Pupils: Implications for Policy and Practice. British Journal of Educational Studies, 52(2), 166-179. Sargeant, J., & Harcourt, D. (2012). Doing Ethical Research with Children. London McGraw Hill. Sargeant, J. (2012). Prioritising Student Voice: "tween" Children's Perspectives on School Success. Education 3-13(March). doi: 10.1080/03004279.2012.668139 United Nations. (1989). Convention on the Rights of the Child. Geneva. Wubbels, T. (2011). An international perspective on classroom management: what should prospective teachers learn? Teaching Education, 22(2), 113-131.

Author Information

Jonathon Sargeant (presenting / submitting)
Australian Catholic University
Faculty of Education
Fitzroy

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.