Reflection in the Educational Transformation of Experience for Learning: How and Why?
Author(s):
Remigijus Bubnys (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2014
Format:
Poster

Session Information

27 SES 05.5 PS, General Poster Session

General Poster Session, Chaired by Convenors of NW 27

Time:
2014-09-03
12:30-14:00
Room:
Poster Area D (between B014 - B018)
Chair:

Contribution

Philosophy of learning based on reflection begins from everyday experience at a higher education institution. Students’ learning is holistic: it encompasses the person’s thinking, feelings, perception and behaviour. Therefore one of the aims in order to improve the students’ learning should be the development of abilities to reflect on one’s experience. Many scholars (Brockbank et al., 2002; Jarvis et al. 2004; Boud, et al., 2005; Black & Plowright 2010 et al.) analyze the issues of learners’ personal and professional development, paying a lot of attention to learning from one’s experience and development of reflective practice. Reflection here is called a process during which experience is turned into learning. It is a way to analyze experience and to discover new meanings, because experience itself does not ensure acquisition.

Reflection, which can strengthen learning and corporate personal as well as professional efficiency, helps to outlive and to give a sense of experience; thus, analysis of experience has to be one of the main goals of learning at a higher education institution;  it activates learning, self-analysis, as well as solution of problems; it emerges from professional experience as well as it involves reflective thinking in forming a situation when it is referred to personal system of viewpoints, attitudes and values, constantly leaving an open possibility re-form (Roberts, 2009).  Reflection, learning from own experience, stimulates taking of responsibility for one’s actions and decisions. It is an active creation of information, its revision and creation of new theories.

Different models of reflection for analysis of experience are offered in scientific literature sources (Dewey, 1933; Boyd & Fales, 1983; Kolb, 1984; Schön, 1987; Gibbs, 1988; Jarvis, 1992; Atkins & Murphy, 1993; Cowan, 1998; Johns, 2004; Boud et al., 2005, etc.). Planning students’ learning at a higher education institution, it is possible to successfully use schemes of these models formulating assignments for theoretical lectures, seminars and practical classes as well as organizing students’ independent work or practical classes. Different patterns of reflection as a way of analyzing experience should be integrated into the whole educational process, helping the prospective specialist to become aware of his/her attitude towards learning. He/she should learn making complex decisions in various life situations and develop the practitioner’s holistic competence.

The characterand organization of research on reflection modelling and implementing into curriculum (Janssen et al., 2008; Kreber & Castleden, 2009; Harvey, et al., 2010; Harvey & Bauman, 2012, etc.) is determined by political and social context of a country, traditions and aims of a higher education institution. The analysis of most works (Moon, 1999; Sugerman et al., 2000; Nash, 2008 etc.) allow stating that coherence of reflective learning concept to the conception of Kolb’s (1984) experience-based learning (which emphasises the importance of learners’ experience in educational process) dominates. However, it does not elaborate reflection as essential element in learning from own experience. Such concept of reflective learning can be treated as insufficient in disclosing possibilities of reflection application in higher education.

The presentation includes reflection models, accentuating conditions of reflection at a higher education institution, in order to answer the research question: “What are the key stages and conditions of reflecting and reflection in higher education?” 

Research focus is conceptual relationship between reflective learning models and context of higher education.

The aim is to substantiate the relationship between reflection and context of higher education by comparing reflection models and illustrating possibilities of implementation of reflective learning in higher education.

Method

Sample. Selection of scientific literature resources had been criterion-based. The criterions were as follows: (1) resource should be scientific (based on research or conceptual evidence and published as an article, monograph, PhD dissertation or research report); (2) keywords for selection were reflection, reflecting, higher education, learning, teaching by integrating them as a complex words, where reflection or reflecting were the leading terms; e.g., reflection and higher education, reflecting and higher education, reflection and learning, etc. Method. The method employed in this article was a review of literature (Stumme et al., 1998; Taylor, 2010). The literature review is an account of what has been published on a topic by accredited scholars and researchers. In writing the literature review, the purpose is to convey to reader what knowledge and ideas have been established on a topic. As a piece of writing, the literature review is defined by a guiding concept (e.g., research aim, the problem the author discusses). It is not just a descriptive list of the material available, or a set of summaries. The performed steps of the review of the literature were following (Taylor, 2010): (1) organizing the literature selection and review by relating it directly to the research question the author develops; (2) synthesizing results into a summary of what is and is not known; (3) identifying areas of controversy in the literature; (4) raising questions that need further research. A literature review is a piece of discursive prose, not a list describing or summarizing one piece of literature after another (Stumme et al., 1998; Taylor, 2010).

Expected Outcomes

Different reflection processes contain three main stages. The first stage is emergence of unpleasant feelings and thoughts due to the experience being outlived and the need to solve the situation that caused these experiences. The second stage is critical and constructive analysis of a situation as well as own feelings, which involves possessed and new knowledge necessary to solve a problem. The third stage is development of new viewpoint to the situation by projecting possible ways for acting in future situations. Reflection creates premises for improvement of ‘structures’ of the possessed knowledge and understanding of learners, which consist of interrelated and interdependent dimensions. The first dimension involves coordination of possessed true-life practical experience and theoretical knowledge acquired at the university. The second dimension involves creation of conditions to reflect as well as elements of theoretical and practical learning contexts. The third dimension involves interactions with participants of educational process and directly influences students’ involvement into reflection. It leads to the fourth dimension: formation of professional identity of a student as a future specialist and his/her autonomy when studying. Reflective learning involves content (analysis of a situation by projecting actions and strategies), process (choice of problem-solution strategies and assessment of their effectiveness), premises (analysis of personal premises). It starts from reflection for action, linking new information with what is known as well as projecting what can be necessary to perform. It continues in the activity when a person reflects present situation as well as orients to difficulties and their reasons. Reflection on action continues after the activity when a learner reflects and assesses acquired new understanding by reflecting in action as well as what he / she can apply in his / her further learning.

References

Atkins, S., Murphy, K. (1993). Reflection: a review of the literature. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 18, 1188–1192. Black, P. E., Plowright, D. (2010). A Multi-dimensional Model of Reflective Learning for Professional Development. Reflective Practice, 11 (2), 245–258. Boud, D., et al. (2005). Reflection: Turning Experience into Learning. London and New York: RoutledgeFalmer. Boyd, E., Fales, A. (1983). Reflective Learning: Key to learning from experience. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 23 (2), 99–117. Brockbank, A., et al., (2002). Reflective Learning in Practice. Burlington: Gower Publishing. Cowan, J. (1998). On Becoming an Innovative University Teacher. Buckingham: Open University. Dewey, J. (1933). How We Think. New York: D. C. Heath. Gibbs, G. (1988). Learning by Doing: A guide to teaching and learning methods. Oxford: Further Education Unit, Oxford Brookes University. Harvey, M., Bauman, C. (2012) Using Student Reflections to Explore Curriculum Alignment. Asian Social Science. 8 (14), 9-18. Harvey, M., et al. (2010). Aligning Reflection in the Cooperative Education Curriculum. Journal of Cooperative Education, 11(3), 137-152. Janssen, F., et al. (2008). Positive experiences as input for reflection by student teachers. Teachers and Teaching, 14 (2), 115–127. Jarvis, P. (1992). Paradoxes of Learning: on Becoming an Individual in Society. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Jarvis, P., et al. (2004). The Theory and Practice of Learning. London: Routledge Falmer. Johns, C. (2004). Becoming a Reflective Practitioner. A reflective and holistic approach to clinical nursing, practice development and clinical supervision. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. Kolb, D.A. (1984). Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. Kreber, C., Castleden, H. (2009) Reflection on teaching and epistemological structure: reflective and critically reflective processes in ‘pure/soft’ and ‘pure/hard’ fields. Higher Education, 57, 509–531. Moon, J. A. (1999). Reflection in Learning and Professional Development. Theory and Practice. London and New York: Routledge Falmer. Nash, R. J. (2008). Personal Reflection on Educating for Meaning. About Campus, 13(2), 17–24. Roberts, A. (2009). Encouraging reflective practice in periods of Professional workplace experience: the development of a conceptual model. Reflective Practice, 10 (5), 633–644. Schön, D. (1987). Educating the Reflective Practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.  Stumme, G., et al. (1998). Conceptual Knowledge Discovery in Databases Using Formal Concept Analysis Methods. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. Sugerman, D. A., et al. (2000). Reflective Learning. Theory and Practice. Kendall / Hunt Publishing Company. Taylor, D. (2010). The Literature review: A Few Tips On Conducting It. Canada: Toronto University. Available on line at [accessed on 2013-01-21].

Author Information

Remigijus Bubnys (presenting / submitting)
Šiauliai State College, Šiauliai, Lithuania

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.