Teachers’ Leadership in the Didactic Room
Author(s):
Lena Boström (presenting / submitting) Gunnar Augustsson (presenting)
Conference:
ECER 2014
Format:
Paper

Session Information

27 SES 07 C, Teaching Practices in Different Cultures

Paper Session

Time:
2014-09-03
17:15-18:45
Room:
B018 Anfiteatro
Chair:
Anke Wegner

Contribution

Didactics, the core in practical education, plays a vital role in schools throughout the world. Didactics focus on the actors in a learning situation. Didactic competence is described as knowledge of how to teach and communicate knowledge. This leads to the question of how teachers lead students’ learning—i.e., how didactic competence is reflected in the leadership or vice versa. Teacher leadership is complex, and the foundation for becoming a good teacher is to be a good leader. Teachers are now expected to be more professional than they previously had; to synchronously consider their own role in the relationships of teacher-student, teacher–subject, and subject-student; and to simultaneously manage both individuals and classes/groups of students to enable the learning process to work fairly consistently. This comprehensive and target-based approach requires formal "classroom management,” which includes the management of a variety of teaching situations.

Teacher leadership is often regarded as a distinct phenomenon from the community, and it is often neglected in leadership and organizational research in general (Berg, Sundh , & Wede, 2012). This type of leadership is distinct from teachers' organizational leadership, which may include, for instance, lesson plans and deviates from the traditional concept of “classroom management."

Based on aspects of didactics, there is a need for a comprehensive international overview of this type of teacher leadership and its impact on students' learning. We call this the teachers’ didactic leadership. The analysis unit is limited to the individual teaching situation, which we name the “didactic room,” where teachers indirectly or directly interact with students/student groups and subjects. Scoping teacher leadership to the didactic room fills an existing research knowledge gap that can be covered by the concept of “didactic leadership” (Augustsson & Boström, 2012). Didactic leadership regards the attitudes and behaviors that teachers use in the didactic room to influence student thinking, learning and behavior.

“Didactic leadership” relates to and complements the international research on “Educational Leadership” and “Classroom leadership.” The construction of the concept of “didactic leadership” is based on several important international sources of inspiration. Some are Spillane 's (2006) focus on leadership-situated individual practice, routines, and social interactions between leaders, followers, and the current situation; Harris ' (2008) emphasis on the relationship between distributed leadership and learning in both the school and classroom; Hargreave and Fink 's (2006, p.136) emphasis on leadership that extends “across individuals, communities, and networksand down organizational layers”; and  Hersey, Blanchard, and Natemeyer’s (1979) integration of situational leadership and power that enables a direct connection between teachers' subject knowledge, pedagogical skills, and leadership in the didactic room.

For prominent international research and cited ditto, tangential teacher leadership, refer to the following: Crowther and Olsen, 1997; Ertesvåg, 2009; Granström, 2012; Grogan, 2013; Hargreaves and Fink, 2006; Harris, 2008; Hersey, Blanchard, and Natemeyer, 1979; Muijs and Harris, 2003; Pounder, 2006, 2008; and Spillane, 2006. Other valuable international research is Hattie’s (2009) meta-analysis of influencing factors of learning and study achievements, Håkansson and Sundberg (2012) and the Swedish School Inspectorate’s (2010) reviews of research on success factors in Swedish and international Contexts, Nordenbo, et al. (2008) on teacher competence, and Granström’s (2007) overview of the work of teachers in the classroom.

By virtue of the foregoing, the purpose of this study was, from an international perspective, toidentify and classify findings from published research on teachers’ leadership in the didactic room. The objectives were to (a) identify patterns and trends in the research, (b) describe and compare the published findings, and (c) point to a future research agenda.

Method

We employed a systematic literature review (SLR) with content analysis. Employing progressively detailed inclusion criteria, the systematic review of the literature involved multiple phases: an initial identification of potential studies via an advanced search of the databases ERIC and PRIMO; subsequent screening of abstracts and titles; hand searching in reference lists and bibliographies of all retrieved papers; and an in-depth review and theoretical analysis of 50 full articles. The keywords used were didactic*, teachers’ leadership*, didactic room*, didactic leadership*, and classroom management with different combinations. The literature search was limited to 1980–2013 and to publications written in English. Other inclusion criteria were the restriction to some kind of didactic rooms, as well as interactions between teachers, students and subjects. The research team identified applicable articles and verified their inclusion in the search results in order to ensure the sensitivity of the search strategy. References from included studies were also assessed. A qualitative content analysis was conducted on the selected sources. The analysis was divided into three steps: selection of focus texts; encoding them; and interpretation of results. The analysis was characterized by identifying patterns and trends to then be able to describe and compare the published results and point to future research.

Expected Outcomes

By identifying, classifying, and analyzing previous research, we obtained an overview of the research area. First, we noted that the didactics concept is frequently used in international research. Second, there is little research on our specific study. Thus, the answer to our research question seems to be that the research on teacher leadership in the didactic room from a holistic perspective is in its infancy. However, when it comes to our knowledge of objects, namely, didactics and teacher leadership, there were a total of 487 possible relevant publications, and 117 full-text publications were obtained after screening titles and abstracts. After review of the full articles, 50 publications, corresponding to 52 studies, met the inclusion criteria. The results of the content analysis show that many studies have been conducted that are tangential to teachers’ didactic leadership, but they are limited to only one or two aspects of the area. The studies dealt with the subject and leadership, student(s) and leadership, or teacher and his/her leadership. These studies have major substantive variation: different disciplines, countries, school types and age populations, topics, and "rooms/settings"—from physical to virtual. However, only 10 studies cover or problematize didactics from a leadership perspective. The main patterns and trends we see are (a) subjects in didactics—especially science is well represented, (b) higher education is more represented compared to elementary and secondary school, (c) problems with the concept of didactics because of its “overlapping between pedagogy (as upbringing) and didactics (as schooling), and (d) a lack of empirical-based studies and theoretical frameworks. This study shows that there is little international research about didactic leadership. Both empirical research and conceptual frameworks are needed. We are confident that further and deeper research on this leadership could develop, illustrate, and sensitize practitioners and theories of various teachers' didactics leadership in the didactic room.

References

Augustsson, G., & Boström, L. (2012). A theoretical framework about leadership perspectives and leadership styles in the didactic room. International Journal of Human Resource Studies, 2(4), 166–186. doi:10.5296/ijhrs.v2i4.2865 Berg, G., Sundh, F., & Wede, C. (2012). Lärares ledarskap. Lund: Studentlitteratur. Crowther, F., & Olsen, P. (1997). Teachers as leaders—An exploratory framework. International Journal of Educational Management, 11(1), 6–13. Ertesvåg, S. K. (2009). Classroom leadership: The effect of a school development programme. Educational Psychology, 29(5), 515–539. Granström, K. (2012). Tre aspekter på lärares ledarskap i klassrummet. In G. Berg, F. Sundh, & C. Wede (Eds.), Lärare som ledare: i och utanför klassrummet (pp. 29–47). Lund: Studentlitteratur. Granström, K. (2007). Forskning om lärares arbete i klassrummet. Forskning i fokus, (p. 270 s.). Stockholm: Myndigheten för skolutveckling. Retrieved from http://www.skolverket.se/publikationer?id=1846 Grogan, M. (Ed.). (2013). The Jossey-Bass reader on educational leadership, 3rd Edition (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons. Håkansson, J., & Sundberg, D. (2012). Utmärkt undervisning: framgångsfaktorer i svensk och internationell belysning. Stockholm: Natur & Kultur. Hargreaves, A., & Fink, D. (2006). Sustainable leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Harris, A. (2008). Distributed school leadership: Developing tomorrow’s leaders. London: Routledge. Hattie, J. A. C. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge. Hersey, P., Blanchard, K. H., & Natemeyer, W. E. (1979). Situational leadership, perception, and the impact of power. Group & Organization Management, 4(4), 418–428. doi:10.1177/105960117900400404 Muijs, D., & Harris, A. (2003). Teacher leadership—Improvement through empowerment? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 31(4), 437–448. Pounder, J. S. (2006). Transformational classroom leadership. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 34(4), 533–545. Pounder, J. S. (2008). Full-range classroom leadership: Implications for the cross- organizational and cross-cultural applicability of the transformational-transactional paradigm. Leadership, 4(2), 115–135. Spillane, J. P. (2006). Distributed leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Retrieved from http://www.loc.gov/catdir/toc/ecip0514/2005017309.html. Swedish School Inspectorate’s (2010). Framgång i undervisningen: en sammanställning av forskningsresultat som stöd för granskning på vetenskaplig grund i skolan. Stockholm: Skolinspektionen. Retrieved from http://www.skolinspektionen.se/Documents/Om-oss/sammanfattning-forskningsoversikten.pdf

Author Information

Lena Boström (presenting / submitting)
Mid Sweden University
Department of Education
Härnösand
Gunnar Augustsson (presenting)
Mid Sweden University
Education
Härnösand

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.