What Motivates Adults To Change To The Field Of Teaching As A Second Career?
Author(s):
Conference:
ECER 2014
Format:
Paper

Session Information

10 SES 04 A, Second and Mid-Career Entrants to Teaching

Paper Session

Time:
2014-09-03
09:00-10:30
Room:
B217 Sala de Aulas
Chair:
Maeve O'Brien

Contribution

During the past decades, a shortage of Swiss primary and secondary school teachers has been observed. As a consequence, teacher training programs for second-career teachers have been established in many Swiss cantons. Since 2011, the Zurich University of Teacher Education offers such studies for candidates over 30 years of age with former experience in the labor market, as well as in pedagogical work, either within vocational or non-vocational settings. This know-how is supposed to be useful and transferable to the teaching profession. Within the research on teacher education in Switzerland, there is only limited knowledge about second-career teachers. The focus in the international context mainly lays on aspects such as: previous pedagogical experience; vocational biography and associated conceptions of teaching and learning; formal and informal learning processes; professional motivation; supervision of workplace learning and remaining in the teaching profession (Darling-Hammond, Chung & Frelow, 2002; Dill, 1996; Ingersoll, 2001; Tigchelaar, Vermount & Brouwer, 2012; Zeichner & Schulte, 2001).

The entire educational program is being evaluated in a research project at the Zurich University of Teacher Education. The research questions focus on the biographical experience, motivation and expectations of students, as well as the competence development and their socialisation into the new profession. One aim of our research is the optimisation between academic studies at university and workplace learning in school. Another subject, which will be presented in this proposal, is in regard to gaining general knowledge of student’s biographies and their reasons for choosing teaching as a second career. Here the focus lays on student teachers in secondary education and includes these central questions:

-       What is the academic and professional background of the second-career teachers?

-       What are the reasons for their career change, and what motivated them to become teachers?

-       What differences can be observed between students who participate in regular teacher training and second-career teachers (pedagogical experience, motives etc.)?

-       How do they perceive their career change?

The theoretical framework includes concepts of educational science and biographical research. Personal beliefs, informally acquired competences and former experience are assumed to strongly influence their teaching style. In addition, role models are considered to be central in the making of the decision to become a teacher (Herzog et al., 2007; Huberman, 1989; Kappler, 2013). In light of career choice, we consider the person-environment congruence, and we focus on personal skills and interests which best fit into a specific vocational environment with particular requirements (Holland, 1997). Theoretical models highlighting career change look at personality trait, risks and the costs of the change, as well as personal expectations and values, supporting systems and organisational factors. Studies indicate that second-career teachers show higher intrinsic motivation in their profession and have more experience of pedagogical work than students in regular teacher training. Furthermore, second-career teachers explain their career change in terms of intrinsic interest, such as meaningfulness and self-fulfillment, in addition to extrinsic incentives, for example job security, career perspectives and a better income (Grzeda, 1999; Lent et al., 1994; Richardson & Watt, 2005; Rhodes & Doering, 1993).

Method

The study, started in 2012, is planned to continue for a duration of three years. It is divided into sub projects concerning quantitative and qualitative aspects. Every autumn semester, all new second-career students are questioned. We compare their answers to those of the control group consisting of the students on regular programs. The quantitative long-term study includes several measurement points. The first standardised questionnaire covers: demographic items (age, sex, professional development, family etc.); motivation and expectations; reasons for the career change; competences and pedagogical beliefs. Questions about the motivation for choosing this profession are based on an approved questionnaire (Pohlmann & Möller, 2010). Follow up surveys to monitor the development of their competences are distributed regularly, approximately every year. In order to determine whether the second-career teachers continue in the job, another survey has been planned to be carried out five years after the end of the study. A total of 174 second-career students completed the first standardised questionnaire at the beginning of their studies in the autumn semester, 2012. The present input refers to a specific part of the sample, which is secondary school teachers. It is based on the data of the first two measurement points, where we compared the control group (N=101) with the test group (N=76). In addition, narrative interviews were conducted with 30 people of this sample, three months after the beginning of their studies. This data is being interpreted in light of the method of narrative analysis, developed by Rosenthal and Fischer-Rosenthal (2003).

Expected Outcomes

As second-career students have to be over 30 years of age to start the studies, they are on average 19 years older than other students. Therefore, they are more likely to have their own children and more professional experience than the control group. Previously, 23% of them already had a job in education, 14% worked as a manager, and almost 10% had an occupation within banking, insurance or in media. Nevertheless there were a lot of similarities between the two groups: Language based subjects are more popular than the scientific based subjects. There are more women (58%) doing this job than men (42%), and role models seem to be the same. So far, differences between the two groups have appeared in relation to their expectations as well as their desire for a professional life in teaching. The categorised answers which were examined in an open question showed a significant difference between the two groups. The most common answer in both groups was the wish to help children in their development, or to teach them knowledge. The control group students mentioned more often the wish for job variation, while the test group students speak of self-fulfillment, autonomy and meaningfulness. A further significant difference has been identified in the area of experience outside of one’s job. Over 70% of the control group students have experience in giving private lessons, although they have fewer children of their own. Questions about the motivation for choosing this profession showed that they highlight their interest for the subject while second career teachers argued more with pedagogical interest and the belief in their ability to teach. The usefulness of a qualification in teaching has only been an argument of the control group. Further results suggest differences in their pedagogical beliefs and in the development of their competences.

References

Darling-Hammond, L., Chung, R., & Frelow, F. (2002). Variation in teacher preparation: how well do different pathways prepare teachers to teach? Journal of Teacher Education, 53(4), 286-302. Dill, V.S. (1996). Alternative teacher certification. In J. Sikula, T. Buttery, & E. Guyton (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 931-960). New York: Macmillan. Grzeda, M.M. (1999). Re-conceptualizing career change: a career development perspective. Career Development International, 4(6). pp. 305-311. Herzog, W., Herzog, S., Brunner, A., Müller, H.P. (2007). Einmal Lehrer, immer Lehrer? Eine vergleichende Untersuchung der Berufskarrieren von (ehemaligen) Lehrpersonen. Bern: Haupt. Holland, J. L. (1997). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Huberman, R. (1989). Teachers’ life cycle of teaching. Teachers College Record, 91(1), 31-57. Ingersoll, R. M. (2001). Teacher turnover and teacher quality: the recurring myth of teacher shortages. Teachers College Record, 99(1), 41-44. Johnson, S.M.; Kardos, S.M. (2008). The next generation of teachers. Who enters, who stays, and why. In Cochran-Smith, Marilyn; Feiman-Nemser, Sharon; McIntyre, D. John (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Teacher Education. Enduring Questions in Changing Contexts (3rd ed.) (p. 445 – 467). New York: Routledge. Kappler, C. (2013). Berufswahlprozesse und Motive angehender Lehrer. Eine qualitative Studie aus geschlechter- und berufsbiographisch-vergleichender Perspektive. Bern: Haupt Verlag. Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45, 79-122. Pohlmann, B. & Möller, J. (2010). Fragebogen zur Erfassung der Motivation für die Wahl des Lehramtsstudiums (FEMOLA). Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 24(1), 73 – 84. Rhodes, S.R, & Doering, M. (1993), Intention to change careers: determinants and process, The Career Development Quarterly, 42(2). pp. 76-92. Richardson, P.W. & Watt, H.M.G. (2005). ‚I’ve decided to become a teacher‘: Influences on career change. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, pp. 475 – 489. Rosenthal, G. & Fischer-Rosenthal, W. (2003). Analyse narrativ-biographischer Interviews. In Flick, Uwe et al. (Hrsg.): Qualitative Forschung. Ein Handbuch. Reinbek: Rowohlt. S. 456-468. Tigchelaar, A., Vermunt, J.D. & Brouwer, N. (2012). Patterns of development in second-career teachers’ conceptions of learning and teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(4), 1163-1174. Zeichner, K., & Schulte, A. (2001). What we know and do not know from peer-review research about alternative certification programs. Journal of Teacher Education,52, 266-282.

Author Information

Patricia Schär (presenting / submitting)
Zurich University of Teacher Education
Professional Development
Zurich
Christa Kappler (presenting)
Zurich University of Teacher Education
Zürich
Zurich University of Teacher Education, Switzerland
Zurich University of Teacher Education, Switzerland

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.