Session Information
18 SES 13 A, Effective Coach Pedagogies in PE and Sport Settings
Paper Session
Contribution
Sport Education (SE) is a student-centred instructional model for teaching Physical Education (PE) consistent with socio-constructivist premises where students take on progressively higher responsibility in the construction of their own learning (Hastie et al., 2011; Siedentop, 1994). Accordingly, SE aims at a more holistic and comprehensive development of students, who are educated not only as competent players, but also as literate, and enthusiastic sportspersons (Siedentop, 1994). The PE practice is perceived by students as an authentic and meaningful experience, considering that the learning activities integrate six key features of institutionalized sport, namely, seasons, formal competition, record keeping, affiliation, festivity and culminating event. Therefore, the seasons in SE are longer than the traditional multi-activity short units, students learn several sport roles such as player, referee, captain, statistician and coach, while become members of small, heterogeneous, and persisting teams (Siedentop, 1994). Additionally, students are empowered through curriculum ownership and increasing autonomy fostered by cooperative work within peer teaching tasks (PTT) in which they benefit of social development opportunities and lead a good deal of the instructional process (Carlson & Hastie, 1997; Siedentop, 1998). Thus, the student-coaches have the responsibility to conduct their teams throughout the seasons and to manage instruction within PTT, whereby they are expected to play the role of group learning facilitator.
The impact of the SE model on the students’ learning outcomes have been examined mainly through five domains (skill development, game play and tactical awareness; fitness; personal/ social development; student’s aptitudes; and values) (Hastie et al., 2011; Wallhead & O'Sullivan, 2005) from which some significant insights have emerged to further research. On one hand, on SE has emphasised the powerful role that persistent team membership holds in students’ sense of belonging (MacPhail et al., 2008), while students consistently acknowledge the potential of SE in developing their play/tactical awareness (Grant et al., 1992; Pope & Grant, 1996). On the other hand, the lack of student-coaches’ leadership skills found during PTT instruction is considered potentially problematic for content knowledge development and inherent learning of higher-order sports content by students (Wallhead & O'Sullivan, 2005; Wallhead & O’Sullivan, 2007). Thus, although the issues surrounding content knowledge development have caused some scepticism among teachers about the SE’s potential to promote skills development (Alexander & Luckman, 2001), to date, there is a worrying dearth of research focused on student-coach’s task instruction within the PTT. In agreement, the purpose of this study was to examine the instructional effectiveness of one student-coachduring task presentation in a SE Athletics unit.
Method
Expected Outcomes
References
Alexander, K., & Luckman, J. (2001). Australian teachers'perceptions and uses of the sport education model. European Physical Education Review, 7(3), 243-267. Amade-Escot, C. (2005). Using the critical didactic incidents method to analyse the content taught. Journalof Teaching in Physical Education 24(2), 127-148. Carlson, T. B., & Hastie, P. (1997). The student social system within sport education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 16, 176-195. Grant, B. C., Trendinnick, P., & Hodge, K. (1992). Sport Education in Physical Education. New Zealand Journal of Helth, Physical Education and Recreation, 25(3), 3-6. Hastie, P. (2000). An Ecological Analysis of a Sport Education Season. JOURNAL OF TEACHING IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION, 19(3), 355-373. Hastie, P. A., Ojedab, D. M. d., & Luquinc, A. C. n. (2011). A review of research on Sport Education: 2004 to the present. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 16 (2), 103-132. MacPhail, A., Gorely, T., Kirk, D., & Kinchin, G. (2008). Children's experiences of fun and enjoyment during a season of sport education. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 79(3), 344-355. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed ed.). Newbury, Ca: Sage. Pope, C., & Grant, B. C. (1996). Student Experiences in Sport Education. Waikato Journal of education, 2, 845-453. Rink, J. E. (1994). Task presentation in pedagogy. QUEST, 46, 270-280. Siedentop, D. (1994). Sport education quality PE through positive sport experiences. Champaign: Human Kinetics. Siedentop, D. (1998). What is sport education and how does it work? Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 69 (4), 18-20. Wallhead, T., & O'Sullivan, M. (2005). Sport Education: Physical education for the new millenium? . Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 10(2), 181-210. Wallhead, T., & O’Sullivan, M. (2007). A didactic analysis of content development during the peer teaching tasks of a Sport Education season. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 12(3), 225-243.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.