Formative assessment in the Czech Republic
Author(s):
Veronika Laufková (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2014
Format:
Paper

Session Information

ERG SES C 06, Assessment and Education

Paper Session

Time:
2014-09-01
11:00-12:30
Room:
FPCEUP - 245
Chair:
Sabine Krause

Contribution

When people think about assessment, they usually mean summative assessment. The main goal of summative assessment is to measure the level of success that has been obtained at the end of units; summative assessment especially includes final exams (only marks without supplementary oral or written feedback). In fact, formative assessment is a specific kind of assessment. The formative assessment provides feedback to both teachers and pupils about the progress of the lesson. And, as Black and Wiliam demonstrated (1998), improving formative assessment raises student achievements.

 

The development of student assessment is seen as important component in Czech education policy. The main conclusions of OECD (Reviews of Evaluation and Assessment in Education, 2012, 14) about assessment in the Czech Republic pointed out the need for a stronger commitment to improving students´ achievements through the use of formative assessment to enhance student learning, rather than simply through the use of assessment summatively for recording and reporting learning.

 

There is not much information about formative assessment in the Czech Republic (e.g. Slavík, 1999; Starý, 2007; Novotná et Krabsová, 2013). However all teachers make assessments in every class they teach. Therefore, this paper is focused on the implementation of formative assessment into Czech schools. I put an emphasis on the nature and the main features of formative assessment in the Czech Republic. I would like to summarize the different strategies through which Czech teachers put into practice formative assessment in the educational process. Moreover, the students and teachers´ feelings related to the specific assessment system at selected schools have been also described.

 

According to objectives, there is one central question and three research subquestions about this process. These are:

Central research question:  What is the role of formative assessment in the lessons of Czech secondary schools (ISCED 2)?

Research subquestions:

1. What strategies of formative assessment are integrated in a specific school student assessment system of Czech secondary school?

2. What are students´ experiences and feelings of formative assessment?

3.  What challenges exist for teachers with implementation the formative assessment into Czech schools?

Method

In order to better to interpret and understand the complex reality of formative assessment, I have chosen the qualitative design of research. To compare the different ways of implementation of formative assessment, a multi-case study approach has been used. Data have been collected at secondary schools in the Czech Republic. The selection of schools has been mainly based on their applications of accessible School Educational Programmes. This research has been conducted using participant observation, in-depth interviews, focus groups and content analyses of documents. The participant observation has been restricted by the selection and recording of behaviours of people in the school during teaching and learning. Concerning in-depth interviews, I have been working with teachers and selected students at lower secondary schools. The advantages of focus groups were summarized by Morgan (1996), who emphasised “the group effect” and also the fact that participants query each other and explain themselves to each other. Focus groups also allow asking the participants themselves to compare their experiences and views. Content analyses of documents have been performed on worksheets, pupil's record books, exercise books and so on. The interviews have been audio recorded and subsequently transcribed for analysis. Analyses involve immersion in the data, reading and re-reading the transcripts. The software MAQXDA 10 has been employed for qualitative data analysis. I am aware of problems with qualitative research, such as huge time investment, difficulties with proper data coding, a large amount of data to transcribe, researcher bias and so on. Nevertheless, I strongly believe that for setting objectives of my Ph.D. thesis it is necessary to use qualitative methods.

Expected Outcomes

According to the performed analyses, it is evident that successful implementation of formative assessment is applicable only in case that teachers know and actively use a constructivist approach of educational process. Constructivism transforms students from a passive recipient of information to an active participant in learning process. However, a large number of Czech secondary schools are constantly based on transmission of knowledge. One of the expected results of this work is finding that the spectrum of strategies of formative assessment, which are currently used in the Czech Republic, is not sufficient. The strategies of formative assessment used in selected Czech schools include weekly plans, sharing learning targets and criteria for success, strategic teacher questioning, providing oral feedback, self-assessment and peer-assessment and also assessment with the assistance of portfolio. The application of new strategies may have strong positive impact on learning process and supportive climate in classrooms. The improvement of effectivity of already used strategies cannot be neglected, too.

References

Black, P., Viliam, D. (1998). Inside the Black Box: Raising Standards Through Classroom Assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(20), 139–148. Morgan, D. L. (1996). Focus Groups. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 129–152.. Novotná, K. & Krabsová, V. (2013). Formativní hodnocení: případová studie. Pedagogika, 63(3), 355–371 (in Czech). Santiago, P. et al. (2012). OECD Reviews of Evaulation and Assessment in Education. Czech Republic. Main Conclusions. OECD, 2012. Dostupné z http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/33/47/49479976.pdf Slavík, J. (1999). Hodnocení v současné škole. Praha: Portál (in Czech). Starý, K. (2007). Formativní hodnocení ve školní výuce. In Školní vzdělávání. Zahraniční trendy a inspirace. Praha: Karolinum, s. 222–242 (in Czech)

Author Information

Veronika Laufková (presenting / submitting)
Charles University
Institute for Research and Development of Education
Prague 1

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.