ERG SES H 11, ICT and Education
In our current media-saturated environment, educators and administrators recognize that teaching media literacy skills is a critical part of education in today’s world. Although there are different definitions of media literacy, three elements should be included in media literacy: 1) technical knowledge and skills, 2) critical understanding, 3) communication and creation (Hobbs, 2010; Livingstone, 2004; Vanwynsberghe, Paulussen, & Verdegem, 2011). Media literacy education (MLE) explores the processes of teaching and learning associated with these knowledge, skills and competences (Hobbs, 2005), which emphasizes not only technical knowledge and skills, both also analyzing media and creating media products (Buckingham, 2005).
Despite the growing recognition of media literacy education as a field of study, research on the concerns and implementation of educators of MLE is not sufficient. Research on MLE is an emerging research area and empirical findings are urgently needed in order to provide suggestions and recommendations for school leaders and educational policy makers regarding the implementation and integration of MLE in school curriculum. Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate teachers’ stages of concern, perceived need, school support and teacher practices of the integration of media literacy education in primary schools. For this purpose, this study examines the following. 1. What are teachers’ stages of concern about MLE integration in primary education? 2.What are teachers’ perceived needs for MLE in primary education? 3.What are the practices of teachers’ MLE integration in primary education? 4.What relationships exist between teachers’ stage of concerns of MLE, perceived need and their integration of MLE in the curriculum? 5. How school environment is associated with teachers’ integration of MLE in the curriculum?
Based on literature review, we integrated previous studies and information about the relationship between teachers’ perceptions and practices of MLE. In our conceptual framework, objective, content and assessment are essential parts of integration of MLE. Teachers’ stages of concern and perceived need can be seen the internal variables, while school context are the external variables.
Buckingham, D. (2005). The Media Literacy of Children and Young People. Retrieved from http://eprints.ioe.ac.uk/145/1/Buckinghammedialiteracy.pdf Fedorov, A. (2007). Media Education : Sociology Surveys. Taganrog: Kuchma Publishing House. Feng, L. (2008). Achievements and Difficulties - Review Ten Years of Media Literacy Education in China 1, 4(6). Hobbs, R. (2005). The State of Media Literacy Education. Journal of Communication, 55(4), 865–871. Hobbs, R. (2010). Digital and Media Literacy: A Plan of Action. Washington, D.C.: The Aspen Institute. Livingstone, S. (2004). What is media literacy ? Intermedia, 32(3), 18–20. Scull, T. M., & Kupersmidt, J. B. (2011). An Evaluation of a Media Literacy Program Training Workshop for Late Elementary School Teachers. The Journal of Media Literacy Education, 2(3), 199–208. Retrieved from http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3530162&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract Torres, M., & Mercado, M. (2006). The Need for Critical Media Literacy In Teacher Education Core Curricula. Educational Studies: A Jrnl of the American Educ. Studies Assoc., 39(3), 260–282. doi:10.1207/s15326993es3903_5 Vanwynsberghe, H., Paulussen, S., & Verdegem, P. (2011). TOWARDS A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR MEDIA LITERACY (pp. 1–19). International Association for Media and Communication Research. Wan, G., & Gut, D. (2008). Roles of Media and Media Literacy Education : Lives of Chinese and American Adolescents. New Horizons in Education, 56(2), 28–42. Retrieved from http://www.ln.edu.hk/osl/newhorizon/abstract/v56n2/3.pdf
Some networks have already started to plan their chairperson(s).
But at the moment chairpersons are only pencilled in, as we will still need to check for time conflicts between presentation and chairing duties. EERA office will work on this in due course and then officially let chairpersons know about their chairing duties.
Meanwhile, thank you for your patience.
00. Central Events (Keynotes, EERA-Panel, EERJ Round Table, Invited Sessions)
Network 1. Continuing Professional Development: Learning for Individuals, Leaders, and Organisations
Network 2. Vocational Education and Training (VETNET)
Network 3. Curriculum Innovation
Network 4. Inclusive Education
Network 5. Children and Youth at Risk and Urban Education
Network 6. Open Learning: Media, Environments and Cultures
Network 7. Social Justice and Intercultural Education
Network 8. Research on Health Education
Network 9. Assessment, Evaluation, Testing and Measurement
Network 10. Teacher Education Research
Network 11. Educational Effectiveness and Quality Assurance
Network 12. LISnet - Library and Information Science Network
Network 13. Philosophy of Education
Network 14. Communities, Families and Schooling in Educational Research
Network 15. Research Partnerships in Education
Network 16. ICT in Education and Training
Network 17. Histories of Education
Network 18. Research in Sport Pedagogy
Network 19. Ethnography
Network 20. Research in Innovative Intercultural Learning Environments
Network 22. Research in Higher Education
Network 23. Policy Studies and Politics of Education
Network 24. Mathematics Education Research
Network 25. Research on Children's Rights in Education
Network 26. Educational Leadership
Network 27. Didactics – Learning and Teaching
The programme is updated regularly (each day in the morning)
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.