Associations Between Early Years Pedagogy And Children's Involvement And Wellbeing In The Classroom
Author(s):
Conference:
ECER 2014
Format:
Paper

Session Information

08 SES 11, Coherence, Collaboration and Partnerships in Health Education

Paper Session

Time:
2014-09-04
17:15-18:45
Room:
B101 Sala de Aulas
Chair:
Leena Paakkari

Contribution

Within the field of early childhood education, there are many competing perspectives on what constitutes good practice and how this should be reflected in policy reform. In terms of early years pedagogy, there has been a growing international movement towards ‘developmentally appropriate’ practice, which emphasizes the value of age-appropriate, participative, experiential, small-group, outdoor learning experiences (e.g. Bertam and Pascal, 2002; Walsh et al, 2010). Indeed, in the context of Wales, a new curriculum for children aged 3-7 (the Foundation Phase) was introduced in 2008 echoing these principles, drawing on early years evidence from Scandinavia, Reggio Emilia and New Zealand (DCELLS, 2008ab; Maynard et al, 2013; NAfW, 2003; OECD, 2004).

Although the Foundation Phase is statutory for all children aged 3-7 in Wales, there has been considerable variation in implementation across schools, classrooms and pre-school settings (Taylor et al, 2013). This paper, part of an overarching national evaluation of the Foundation Phase, exploits this variation to assess which pedagogical approaches are more or less associated with children’s involvement and wellbeing in the classroom.

Specifically, this paper examines relationships between involvement/wellbeing and the following developmentally appropriate pedagogical approaches: child choice, experiential experience, explorative experience, physical activity, outdoor learning and small group learning. Assessing these relationships is important because there is still much national and international policy debate concerning the value of different approaches, and how they apply to different year groups. For example, the Foundation Stage in England advocates such approaches until the age of 5, whereas the Foundation Phase in Wales advocates such approaches until the age of 7. There is also considerable variation across other European countries.

There also remains considerable academic interest in identifying effective early years pedagogy (e.g. Bowman et al, 2001; Siraj-Blatchford and Sylva, 2004; Whitebread, 1996; Whitehead, 1993). Indeed, previous research suggests that the pedagogical approaches under investigation might be positively associated with involvement and wellbeing, (e.g. Maynard et al, 2011; Walsh et al, 2010), but it is unclear to what extent these relationships will differ, and how each will compare to more formal pedagogies such as direct whole-class teaching.

Method

In order to establish whether participative, experiential, small-group, outdoor pedagogies are associated with high levels of child involvement and wellbeing, the primary method used was classroom observation in 51 case study school and pre-school settings. All school and pre-school settings were selected using stratified random sampling. In total, over 3000 individual two-minute child observations were completed from 131 different classes catering for children across the 3-7 years age range. During each two-minute observation, a record was made of the type of pedagogy experienced by that child and also the observed level of involvement and wellbeing perceived to be experienced by the child at that time. Following from Pascal et al (1998) and Ebbeck et al (2012), we decided to use the Laeven’s scales (Laevers, 2005) to measure child involvement and wellbeing. The observation framework used to record pedagogy was developed specifically for this evaluation. Two researchers undertook half of the observations each (in both English Medium and Welsh Medium settings). Inter-rater reliability scores suggest there was ‘substantial agreement’ between the two researchers (Landis and Koch, 1977). In addition to these observations, children’s views were also sought via a survey and focus group discussions with 6 and 7 year olds. Indeed, over 650 children aged 6 and 7 were helped to complete the short survey (in groups of five) which asked questions about their attitudes to learning and their wellbeing in school. Several of these questions were lifted from the Age 7 UK Millennium Cohort Survey conducted in 2008. Other questions were added to ascertain pupil Social Economic Status and family characteristics. Twenty-eight children of the same age also took part in focus group discussions on the same topic (groups of 4 from a sub-sample of 7 case study schools). Finally, practitioner/stakeholder perspectives on the association between these pedagogies and child involvement and wellbeing were also considered via two national surveys (361 school responses and 243 pre-school responses), 37 Local Authority interviews, 4 pre-school umbrella organisation interviews and 88 case study Senior Management staff interviews. Brief, informal interviews were also conducted with the teacher of every class observed and at least one teaching assistant from each school/setting visited.

Expected Outcomes

Researcher observations of individual children’s involvement and wellbeing in the classroom varied according to the type of pedagogy experienced by the child at that time. All of the key ‘developmentally appropriate’ pedagogies were associated with slightly higher levels of child involvement and/or wellbeing, and this was apparent across all year groups (ages 3-7). For example, physically active, explorative, first-hand pedagogies and child choice were associated with high involvement and wellbeing (physically active learning explained the most variation). Practical pedagogies, peer collaboration and working in small groups were associated with high involvement (but not wellbeing). Outdoor experiences were associated with high wellbeing (but not involvement). Traditional ‘direct teaching’ and the use of worksheets were associated with low wellbeing (but not involvement). However, the strongest associations with both involvement and wellbeing were accounted for by child-adult and child-child interactions. The presence of a teacher (with or without a teaching assistant) was also associated with higher observed child involvement (but not wellbeing) than the presence of only a teaching assistant. Involvement and wellbeing was usually higher for girls than for boys, and was usually higher in pre-school settings and school nurseries than older year groups (i.e. those catering for children aged 4-7). The vast majority of the practitioners, senior management, Local Authority advisors and pre-school personnel interviewed/surveyed were of the opinion that developmentally appropriate pedagogies can improve children’s involvement and wellbeing. This was said to be because children enjoy active, experiential activities where they are given choice in their learning and have the chance to practice (and learn from mistakes) in small groups. However, there were no meaningful associations between the snapshot observations of classroom pedagogy and the survey responses of the children aged 6 and 7. The focus groups with children aged 6 and 7 help understand this.

References

Bertram, T., & Pascal, C. (2002). Early years education: An international perspective. London: QCA. Bowman, B., Donovan, S., & Burns, M. (Eds.). (2001). Eager to Learn: Educating our Preschoolers. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. DCELLS (2008a). Framework for Children’s Learning for 3-7 year olds in Wales. Cardiff: Welsh Assembly Government. DCELLS (2008b). Learning and Teaching Pedagogy. Cardiff: Welsh Assembly Government. Ebbeck, M., Winter, P., Russo, S., et al. (2012). Measuring children’s involvement as an indicator of curriculum effectiveness: a curriculum evaluation of a selected child study centre in Singapore. Early Child Development and Care, 182, 5, 609-619. Landis, J., R., & Koch, G., G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data, Biometrics, 33, 1, 159–174. Leavers, F. (2005). Well-being and involvement in care: A process oriented self-evaluation instrument for care settings. Research Centre for Experiential Education: Leuven University. Maynard, T., Taylor, C., Waldron, S., Rhys, M., Smith, R., Power, S. and Clement, J. (2013) Evaluating the Foundation Phase: Policy Logic Model and Programme Theory. Social Research No. 37/2012, Cardiff: Welsh Government. Maynard, T., Waters, J., & Clement, J. (2011). Moving outdoors: further explorations of ‘child-initiated’ learning in the outdoor environment. Education, 3, 13, 1-18. NAfW (2003). The Learning Country: Foundation Phase – 3 to 7 years. Cardiff: National Assembly for Wales. OECD (2004). Five Curriculum Outcomes (Starting Strong, Curriculum and Pedagogies in Early Childhood Education and Care). Directorate for Education: OECD. Pascal, C., Bertram, T., Mould, C. & Hall, R. (1998). Exploring the relationship between process and outcome in young children’s learning: stage one of a longitudinal study. International Journal of Educational Research, 29, 51-67. Siraj-Blatchford, I. & Sylva, K. (2004) Researching Pedagogy in English Pre-schools. British Education Research Journal, 30, 5, 713-730. Taylor, C., Maynard, T., Davies, R., Waldron, S. Rhys, M., Power, S., Moore, L., Blackaby, D. & Plewis, I. (2013). Evaluating the Foundation Phase: Annual Report 2011/12. Social Research No. 43/2012, Cardiff: Welsh Government. Walsh, G., M., McGuinness, C., Sproule, L., & Trew, K. (2010). Implementing a play-based and developmentally appropriate curriculum in Northern Ireland primary schools: what lessons have we learned? Early Years, 30, 1, 53-66. Whitebread, D. (Ed.) (1996). Teaching and Learning in the Early Years. London, Routledge Whitehead, M. (1993). Why not happiness? Reflections on change and conflict in early childhood education, in Gammage, P. & Meighan, J. (Eds.) Early Childhood Education: Taking Stock. Education Now Publishing, Ticknall.

Author Information

Cardiff University, United Kingdom
Mirain Rhys (presenting)
Cardiff University, United Kingdom
Cardiff University, United Kingdom
Cardiff University, United Kingdom

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.