Hostile And Benevolent Sexist Attitudes According To Sex, School Year, And The Characteristics Of The Center
Author(s):
Elisabeth Malonda (presenting / submitting) Anna LLorca Mestre (presenting)
Ana Tur-Porcar (presenting)

Vicenta Mestre (presenting)

Paula Samper (presenting)
Conference:
ECER 2014
Format:
Poster

Session Information

09 SES 05.5 PS, General Poster Session

General Poster Session

Time:
2014-09-03
12:30-14:00
Room:
Poster Area E (in front of B001-B003)
Chair:

Contribution

Almost all (95%) young adolescents claim to be “fairly or strongly in favor” of gender equality (INJUVE, 2012), scientific studies shows the prevalence and harm of sexism (Friedman and Leaper, 2010; Herrera, Exposito and Moya, 2012; Ovejero, Yubero, Larrañaga and Navarro, 2013). Also, in recent years the hostile sexism has evolved into more subtle forms of sexism, benevolent sexism, attitudes more tolerated by men and women. The present study focuses on Ambivalent Sexism Theory (Glick and Fiske, 1996, 1999). Sexism upholds power and a clear male identity with respect to women, which places men in advantageous position with respect to women (Lemus, Castillo, Moya, Padilla and Ryan, 2008.). In this line, several studies have found that boys obtained higher rates in hostile sexism than girls (Glick and Fiske, 1996, Pearson, 2009; Garaigordobil and Aliri, 2012). However, differences are absent between males and females with respect to BS (Lemus et al., 2008; Carretero, 2011). In addition, Glick and Hilt (2000) argue that, with age, adolescents become more aware of the injustice of sexism, and this is corroborated by several studies (Lemus et al., 2008). Likewise, it has been observed that students of private schools have obtained better results in sexism (Aliri, Garaigordobil and Martinez-Valderrey, 2013). The goal in this study is to determine the differences presented in both hostile sexism and benevolent sexism by adolescents, by sex, according the school year (first phase of compulsory secondary education and the second phase of compulsory secondary education), and the type of school, public or private.

Method

1,114 students have participated (577 males, 51.8%, and 272 women, 47.6%), with an age range between 12 and 17 years (M = 13.81, SD = 1.49; boys: M = 13.98, SD = 1.54, girls: M = 13.63, SD = 1.42). The students came from educational centers from the Valencian metropolitan area (Spain), 7 public schools and 2 privately, selected randomly. Regarding educational level, 495 adolescents (44.4%) enrolled the first phase of compulsory secondary education, and 619 children (55.5%) the second phase of compulsory secondary education. With a descriptive design, the evaluation of the sample was carried out by self-report questionnaire Ambivalent Inventory for Adolescents (ISA, Lemus, Castillo, Moya, Padilla and Ryan, 2008). This questionnaire assesses hostile sexism (HS) and benevolent sexism (BS) in adolescents on a scale of 1 to 6.

Expected Outcomes

The results show that sex is a variable to consider in the constructs assessed, and the school year of participants and center where they belong. Boys obtained higher scores on SH than girls in all age groups. Regarding the benevolent sexism, boys get higher rates in the first phase of compulsory secondary education, but not the case among those enrolled in the second phase of compulsory secondary education, disappearing, thus sex differences. Given the age of the adolescent boys and girls have higher rates smaller in hostile sexism and benevolent sexism than boys and older girls. Finally, in relation to the type of school, there are no significant differences in hostile sexism, however, there are significant differences in benevolent sexism. The results are discussed according to the explained aim.

References

Aliri, J., Garaigordobil, M., y Martínez-Valderrey, V. (2013). Sexismo y características del centro escolar: diferencias en función del tipo de centro. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 31(2), 349-360. http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/rie.31.2.159191 Carretero, R. (2011). Sexo, sexismo y acoso escolar entre iguales. Revista Complutense de Educación, 22(1), 27-43. Retrieved from http://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/RCED/article/view/36565 Friedman, C., & Leaper, C. (2010). Sexual-minority college women’s experiences with discrimination: Relations with identity and collective action. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34(2), 152–164. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2010.01558.x Garaigordobil, M., & Aliri, J. (2012). Parental socialization styles, parents educational level, and sexist attitudes in adolescence. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 15(2), 592-603. doi: 10.5209/rev_SJOP.2012.v15.n2.38870 Glick, P., & Fiske, S. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of personality and social psychology, 70(3), 491-512. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491 Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1999). The Ambivalence Toward Men Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent beliefs about men. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23(3), 519-536. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1999.tb00379.x Glick, P., & Hilt, L. (2000). From combative children to ambivalent adults: The development of gender prejudice. In T. Eckes y M. Trautner (Eds.), Developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 243-272). Mahwah, New Jersey: Erlbaum. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/619461548?accountid=14777 Herrera, M. C., Expósito, F., & Moya, M. (2012). Negative reactions of men to the loss of power in gender relations: Lilith vs. Eve. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to the Legal Context, 4(1), 17-42. Retrieved from http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=3786951 INJUVE (2012a). Cambios y persistencias en la igualdad de género de los y las jóvenes en España (1990-2010). Ministerio de Sanidad, Servicios Sociales e Igualdad, Gobierno de España. Retrieved from http://www.injuve.es/sites/default/files/2012/42/publicaciones/estudio%20cambios%20igualdad%20genero.pdf Lemus, S., Castillo, M., Moya, M., Padilla, J. L., y Ryan, E. (2008). Elaboración y validación del Inventario de Sexismo Ambivalente para Adolescentes. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 8(2), 537-562. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/621968594?accountid=14777 Ovejero, A., Yubero, S., Larrañaga, E., y Navarro, R. (2013). Sexismo y comportamiento de acoso escolar en adolescentes. Psicología Conductual, 21(1), 157-171. Retrieved from http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Sexismo+y+comportamiento+de+acoso+escolar+en+adolescentes.-a0328944073 Pearson, C.T. (2009). Predictors of sexist attitudes in a mexican american adult sample: a test of Glick and Fiske’s ambivalent sexism theory. (Order No. 3372378, Fielding Graduate University). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, 233. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/622205009?accountid=14777(622205009;%202010-99060-537)

Author Information

Elisabeth Malonda (presenting / submitting)
University of Valencia, Spain
Anna LLorca Mestre (presenting)
University of Valencia
Basic Psychology
Valencia
Ana Tur-Porcar (presenting)
University of Valencia, Spain
Vicenta Mestre (presenting)
University of Valencia, Spain
Paula Samper (presenting)
University of Valencia, Spain

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.