Session Information
30 SES 02 A, Learning ESE
Paper Session
Contribution
The aim of this project is to explore the ways in which people (both children and adults) think about and talk about environmental change and how schools allow children to reflect creatively on their own environmental context.
We are particularly interested in how conceptualisations of time emerge in children’s understandings of local and global environmental change so we will be looking for manifestations of this in the data that we collect.
People’s narratives about the interplay between local manifestations of changing climates and environments and processes that operate at a global scale will be investigated. The role that folklore has within this is a theme we will consider. To enable us to develop an understanding of this local-global interplay we will develop cross-cultural links to connect the local experience of environmental change in East Anglia with the experience of change elsewhere in the world (for example Alaska and Mongolia).
Moreover, we are interested in intergenerational communication and how knowledge about environmental issues is exchanged between generations so this will be a focus of our research.
The participatory nature of this work will influence how these broad aims are manifested in the research hence the context of the research will influence how these aims play out in different school or organisational settings.
Our evolving questions are:
- What are the factors that shape children’s perception of their own local environment?
- How do primary school children experience time?
What evidence is there that children integrate the past and future into their conceptualisation of place-based environmental change?
What conditions and contexts influence their experiences of time?
- How do children communicate/share their perceptions of environmental change both at the inter- and intra- generational level?
Does climate change feature in these perceptions?
- How does communication change when a cross-cultural element is introduced?
- What cross-cultural convergence/divergence exists about the communication of place-based environmental change?
- What interventions are effective at drawing out children’s thinking about environmental change?
The theoretical framework of this research is still being developed. This is a three-year project that started in October 2013 hence we are still in the process of reviewing and distilling the relevant literature. Moreover, the research is being carried out by an interdisciplinary group from both Education and Social Anthropology which further complicates the identification of a cogent theoretical framework. Notwithstanding these challenges, we are currently drawing on research on participatory learning and transactional methodology (e.g. Ohman and Ostman, 2007, Hart, 2008, Biesta, 2011), intergenerational place-based learning (e.g. Mannion et al. 2010), relationships between understanding of conventional and deep time (e.g. Cheek, 2013), global learning (e.g. Barth and Riekcmann, 2009), climate change education (e.g. Niebert and Groppengieser, 2013) and walking narratives and landscape (e.g. Ingold, 2007).
Method
Expected Outcomes
References
Barth, M., and M. Rieckmann. 2009. “Experiencing the Global Dimension of Sustainability: Student Dialogue in a European-Latin American Virtual Seminar.” The International Journal of Development Education and Global Learning 1, no. 3: 23–38. Biesta, G., 2011. The Ignorant Citizen: Mouffe, Rancière, and the Subject of Democratic Education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 30(2), pp.141–153. Cheek, K.A., 2013. Exploring the Relationship between Students' Understanding of Conventional Time and Deep (Geologic) Time, International Journal of Science Education, 35:11, 1925-1945 Hart, P. 2008. Elusive Participation: Methodological Challenges in Researching Teaching and Participatory Learning in Environmental Education In A. Reid, B.B. Jensen, J. Nikel, and V.Simovska Eds. Participation and learning : perspectives on education and the environment, health and sustainability, [New York]: Springer. Ingold, T. & Vergunst, J. (2008). 'Introduction'. in T Ingold & J Vergunst (eds), Ways of walking: Ethnography and practice on foot. Anthropological Studies of Creativity and Perception, Ashgate, Aldershot, United Kingdom, pp. 1-19. Mannion, G., Adey, C. & Lynch, J., 2010. Intergenerational Place-based Education: where schools, communities, and nature meet. Stirling: University of Stirling for Scottish Centre for Intergenerational Practice. Niebert, K., and Gropengiesser, H., 2013. “Understanding and Communicating Climate Change in Metaphors.” Environmental Education Research 19, no. 3 282–302. doi:10.1080/13504622.2012.690855. Ohman, J. and Ostman, L., 2007. Continuity and Change in Moral Meaning-Making—A Transactional Approach. Journal of Moral Education 36(2), pp.151-168.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.