Relationship between Work Engagement and Job and Life Satisfaction: A Research on Turkish Teachers
Author(s):
Niyazi Özer (submitting) Ebru Oğuz (presenting)
Conference:
ECER 2014
Format:
Paper

Session Information

01 SES 08 B, Ethical Dilemmas and Workplace Bullying

Paper Session

Time:
2014-09-04
09:00-10:30
Room:
B033 Anfiteatro
Chair:
Sara Bubb

Contribution

Psychology has traditionally focused on psychological deficits and disability until recently (Carr, 2004). Therefore, psychology has been criticized as primarily dedicated to addressing mental illness rather than mental ‘‘wellness.’’ (Bakker, Schaufeli, Leiter, & Taris, 2008). However, nowadays positive psychology perspective attracted most of the scholars’ attention such that researchers from different disciplines try to focus and make research on employees' positive emotions and behaviors rather than negative ones. This new branch of psychology is primarily concerned with the scientific study of human strengths and happiness (Carr, 2004; Seligman & Csikszentmihalyi, 2000). Although interest in what is good about humans and their lives has long been a theme of human inquiry, the emergence of positive psychology has provided a conceptual home for researchers and practitioners interested in all aspects of optimal human functioning (Linley & Joseph, 2004).This approach is considered to supplement the traditional focus of psychology on disease, damage, disorder, and disability (Schaufeli, Bakker & Salanova, 2003).

To redress the psychological imbalance and to catalyze a change in psychology, we must bring the building of strength to the forefront in the treatment and prevention of mental illness (Seligman, 2002). For example, if we are willing to make a research on teachers, we should start from the engagement rather than burnout. Burnout can be characterized as a physical, emotional and mental exhaustion which involve such symptoms as physical exhaustion, feeling of despair and hopelessness, emotional deterioration, negative feelings against others (Maslach & Leiter, 1997). On the contrary, work engagement can be defined as “a positive, fulfilling, work-related state of mind that is characterized by vigor, dedication, and absorption” (Schaufeli, Salanova, Gonzalez-Roma & Bakker, 2002, p. 74). Maslach and Leiter (1997) assumes that engagement and burnout constitute the opposite poles of a continuum of work related well-being. According to their point of view while burnout represents the negative pole, engagement represent the positive. Contrary to those who suffer from burnout, engaged employees have a sense of energetic and effective connection with their work, and instead of stressful and demanding they look upon their work as challenging (Bakker, Schaufeli, Leiter, & Taris, 2008). In this regard we assumed that teachers’ work engagement may have a positive effect on their job satisfaction leading a positive effect on their life satisfaction.

The purpose of the study

Therefore the purpose of this research is threefold: first to determine the teachers’ levels of work engagement, and job and life satisfaction, second to investigate whether teachers’ levels of engagement, and job and life satisfaction differ significantly in terms of gender and professional seniority variables, and finally to explore the relationships between work engagement, and job and life satisfaction.  

Method

Research Group The research group consisted of 363 voluntary teachers from schools in Gebze district of Kocaeli, a city in the Marmara region of Turkey. After incomplete and erroneous questionnaire forms were discarded, a total number of 354 questionnaires completed by 172 female and 182 male teachers were used. Considering the subject fields of the participating teachers, 30% were classroom teachers (n=105) and remaining 70% were branch teachers (n=249). Of the participating teachers 71.5% (n=253) were married and 28.5% were single (n=101). Instruments A test battery containing work engagement, work and life satisfaction measures were conducted on the participating teachers. Details on these instruments were given below: Utrech Work Engagement Scale : Participating teachers’ work engagement was measured by a shortened version of the Utrech Work Engagement Scale (UWES-9) developed by Schaufeli, Bakker & Salanova (2003), and adopted in Turkish by Eryılmaz & Doğa (2012). The Turkish form of shortened UWES scale consists of three sub-scales called Vigor (VI), Dedication (DE), and Absorption (AB). Response set for the scale items ranges from never (0) to always (6). Job Satisfaction Scale: Satisfaction scale used in this study was originally developed by Hackman and Oldham (1975) and adopted for the Turkish teachers by Taşdan (2008). Turkish version of the instrument consisted of 14 items as in the original form. Response set for the scale items ranged from extremely dissatisfied (1) to extremely satisfied (5). Life Satisfaction Scale: Life satisfaction scale developed by Diener, Emmons, Larsen, & Griffin (1985) and adapted into Turkish by Köker (1991) was used to determine the life satisfaction levels of participating teachers. Data Analysis In analyzing the data gathered, first the descriptive statistics (mean scores and standard deviations) obtained from the engagement, work and life satisfaction measures were given. Next, zero-order correlation coefficients between these research variables were estimated. Independent samples t-test and one way ANOVA tests were used to find out whether the teachers’ work engagement, life and work satisfaction scores differ significantly in terms of gender and professional seniority. When significant differences were observed between groups, the effect size of the difference was also tested using omega squared coefficient. Also multiple linear regression analysis was used in order to determine the relationships between work engagement, and work and life satisfaction.

Expected Outcomes

Results & Conclusions Results showed that participating teachers got a mean score of 39.07 (SD=8.34) from work engagement scale, 44.51 (SD=8.93) from job satisfaction scale and 21.48 (SD=6.76) from life satisfaction scale. Results also showed that teachers’ levels of engagement, and job and life satisfaction did not differ significantly in terms of gender and professional seniority variables. One purpose of the present study was to investigate the association between teachers’ work engagement, job and life satisfaction. The zero-order correlations between teachers’ scores on work engagement, job and life satisfaction were positively and significantly correlated with each other (correlations ranged from r =.438 to r =.466). Also a regression analysis was done in order to test the predictive power of job satisfaction and work engagement on life satisfaction, which revealed a significant and moderate level of correlation between variables, R=.526, R2=.277; F(2,353)=67.215, p=.00. Accordingly, job satisfaction and work engagement together explained about 27.7% of the total variance in teachers’ life satisfaction scores.

References

REFERENCES Bakker, A. B., Schaufeli, W. B., Leiter, M. P., & Taris, T. W. (2008). Work engagement: An emerging concept in occupational health psychology. Work & Stress, 22(3), 187-200. Carr, A. (2004). Positive psychology: The science of happiness and human strengths. New York: Brunner-Routledge. Diener, E. D., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of personality assessment, 49(1), 71-75. Eryılmaz, A., & Doğa, T. (2012). Subjective well-being at work: Investigating of psychometric properties of Utrecht work engagement scale. Klinik Psikiyatri Dergisi [Journal of Clinical Psychiatry], 15(1). 49-55. Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1975). Development of the job diagnostic survey. Journal of Applied psychology, 60(2), 159. Köker, S. (1991). Comparison of the level of life satisfaction of normal adolescents and adolescents with problems. Unpublished master’s thesis, Ankara University, Graduate School of Social Sciences. Linley, PA, & Joseph, S. (2004). Applied positive psychology: A new perspective for professional practice. In AP Linley & S. Joseph (Eds.), Positive psychology in practice (pp. 3–12). New York: Wiley. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Maslach, C., & Leiter, M. P. (1997). The truth about burnout: How organizations cause personal stress and what to do about it. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire a cross-national study. Educational and psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701-716. Schaufeli, W.B., Salanova, M., Gonza´lez-Roma´ , V. & Bakker, A.B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71-92. Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Positive psychology, positive prevention, and positive therapy. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 3–9). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55, 5-14. Taşdan, M. (2008). Kamu ve özel ilköğretim okullarında görevli öğretmenlerin değer, iş doyumu ve öğretmene mesleki sosyal destek ile ilgili görüşleri. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.

Author Information

Niyazi Özer (submitting)
İnönü University
Department of Educational Sciences
Malatya
Ebru Oğuz (presenting)
Mimar Sinan Fine Arts University
Educational Science
İstanbul

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.