22 SES 03 A, Teaching, Learning and Assessment in Higher Education
Research reported and discussed in this paper was developed within a wider three-year international research project (2011-2014) involving 36 researchers from four Portuguese and three Brazilian universities (The project has been financed by National Funds through Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT) -Foundation for Science and Technology – Project PTDC/CPE-CED/114318/2009.)
In the last decades, students have been entering higher education as never before and European universities have been faced with all sorts of challenges (e.g., quality education for all, student mobility, a growing scarcity of resources). Traditional teaching and assessment practices, mostly based upon the so-called telling paradigm, still predominant in higher education, have been questioned and under pressure to change. Indeed, research have been pointing out that students learn better when they are engaged in the learning processes and when assessment for learning is integral to the organisation and development of teaching (e.g. Biggs, 2006; Black & Wiliam, 2006). As a result, a framework aiming at transforming and improving pedagogy and curricular practices in higher education was formally and politically put forward as a consequence of the so-called Bologna process.
Since then, there is a growing body of literature claiming that: a) there is a need for a greater integration of learning, teaching, and assessment; b) more attention should be put on the need to improve higher education teachers’ expertise in the teaching, learning, and assessment domains of knowledge; and c) there is empirical evidence showing that it is possible to improve higher education teachers’ pedagogical practices and students’ learning (e.g. Bryan & Clegg, 2006; Falchicov, 2005; Menges & Austin, 2001). In a literature synthesis of 30 empirical studies developed in a ten-year time span (2000-2009), Fernandes & Fialho (2012) concluded that new and innovative ways to assess students’ learning were related to profound changes in teaching practices. They also inferred that innovative assessment, namely assessment for learning, could only make sense if, for instances, students were provided with quality feedback, were engaged in finding solutions to a variety of tasks, interacted on a regular basis with their colleagues and their teachers, used self-assessments and different forms of “interactive assessments” (e.g., peer assessment, small-group assessment) to regulate their learning, and participated in the processes of curriculum decision-making at the classroom level.
These and other results from research on pedagogy in higher education were used as a framework to study teachers’ teaching and assessment practices, an area that still needs further empirical investigation. Therefore, the overall purpose of the project was to describe, to analyse, and to interpret higher education teachers’ teaching and assessment practices in the context of real undergraduate classes. Moreover, the project studied both teachers’ and students’ perceptions on issues of teaching and assessment practices. Consequently, it enabled the establishment of a variety of relationships between what happened in real classes concerning a given issue (e.g., distribution of feedback; assessment tasks; teaching planning; students’ participation) and the overall perceptions of the participants about that same issue. Both teachers and students played a major role in this research endeavour, sharing their perceptions through interviews and questionnaires and welcoming researchers to observe their classes. As a whole, the project enabled research-based qualitative and quantitative analyses and comparisons.
This paper emerged from research work that took place within the four Portuguese universities involved in the project and it was limited to the study of teaching and assessment practices in the context of undergraduate programmes of Arts and Humanities (e.g., Art History, Design, Languages and European Literatures, Music, Drawing). The other undergraduate programmes involved in the project were in the domains of Social Sciences, Health Sciences, and Sciences and Technology.
Barnett, R. (2009). Knowing and becoming in the higher education curriculum. Studies in Higher Education, 34 (4), 429-440. Biggs, G. (2006). How assessment frames student learning. In C. Bryan & K. Clegg (Orgs.), Innovative Assessment in Higher Education (23-36). New York: Taylor and Francis. Black, P. & Wiliam, D. (2006). Assessment for learning in the classroom. In J. Gardner (Ed.), Assessment and learning (9-25). London: Sage. Bryan, C. & Clegg, K. (2006). Introduction. In C. Bryan e K. Clegg (Orgs.), Innovative assessment in higher education (3-10). New York, NY: Taylor and Francis. Dancer, D. & Kamvounias, P. (2005). Student involvement in assessment: a project designed to assess class participation fairly and reliably. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 30 (4), 445-454. Falchikov, N. (2005). Improving assessment through student involvement: practical solutions for aiding learning in higher and further education. New York, NY: Routledge. Fernandes, D. (2011). Articulação da aprendizagem, da avaliação e do ensino: questões teóricas, práticas e metodológicas. In M. P. Alves & J-M. Deketele (Orgs), Do currículo à avaliação, da avaliação ao currículo (131-142). Porto: Porto Editora. Fernandes, D. & Fialho, N. (2012). Dez anos de práticas de avaliação das aprendizagens no Ensino Superior: uma síntese da literatura (2000-2009). In C. Leite e M. Zabalza (Coords.), Ensino superior: Inovação e qualidade na docência (3693 – 3707). Porto: CIIE da Universidade do Porto. Goodlad, J. (1979). Curriculum inquiry: the study of curriculum practice. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. Goodson, I. (1997). A construção social do currículo. Lisboa: Educa. Menges, R. & Austin, A. (2001). Teaching in higher education. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed) (1122-1156). Washington, DC: AERA. Pacheco, J. (2005). Estudos curriculares: para a compreensão crítica da educação. Porto: Porto Editora. Yorke, M. (2006). Formative assessment in higher education: moves towards theory and the enhancement of pedagogic practice. Higher Education, 47, 477-501. Young, M. (2008). Bringing knowledge back in: From social constructivism to social realism in the sociology of education. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis. Wolcott, H. (1994). Transforming qualitative data: description, analysis, and interpretation. London: Sage.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.