Teachers’ Identity, Motivation, and Pedagogical Beliefs: Investigating their Coherence using Multidimensional Scaling
Conference:
ECER 2014
Format:
Paper

Session Information

10 SES 08 A, Teacher Education: Motivation and Identities

Paper Session

Time:
2014-09-04
09:00-10:30
Room:
B217 Sala de Aulas
Chair:
Judith Harford

Contribution

Due to their relevance in understanding teacher professional life, teacher identity and motivation have become important topics in the literature (Canrinus, Helms-Lorenz, Beijaard, Buitink, & Hofman, 2011; Richardson, Karabenick, & Watt, 2014). These constructs brought a complementary perspective to the teacher thinking literature by considering the self in teachers (Beijaard, Miejer, & Verloop, 2004; Huberman, 1989/1993). The multiplicity of constructs proposed in this field together with the weak theoretical and empirical articulations among them gives, however, a messy impression (Beijard et al., 2004; Woolfolk Hoy, Davis, & Pape, 2006) limiting the understanding of their associations with pedagogical beliefs and with instructional practices. It is for example not clear whether self-efficacy beliefs make up a part of teacher identity such as conceptualized by Woolfolk Hoy et al. (2006) or whether these two constructs are interdependent.

In addition to the deeply researched construct of teacher self-efficacy (Woolfolk & Hoy, 1990), recent research trends found that teacher sense of responsibility (Lauermann & Karabenick, 2012), motivation to become a teacher (Watt & Richardson, 2007), and identity ‑ defined in this study as perceived expertise regarding pedagogy, didactic, and subject taught (Beijaard, Verloop, & Vermunt, 2000) – all provide relevant lenses to understand teachers’ professional life. In spite of the proliferation of constructs and research, some aspects, such as the subject or topic taught, are still largely overlooked in the literature on teacher identity and motivation; it is however probably a relevant factor for teachers having deep content knowledge in their field. For instance, the subject taught might constitute a motivation to teach and professional identity might be primarily based on expertise in the subject. Furthermore, the relevance of identity and motivation constructs for classroom teaching has repeatedly been assumed but seldom been analyzed.

Based on these considerations, the present study aimed at uncovering, in a sample of upper-secondary teachers (vocational and general secondary education teachers), the associations between several of the major constructs related to teacher identity (e.g., strength of identity as a teacher, teacher self-efficacy beliefs) and motivation to teach (e.g., intrinsic value and personal utility value of teaching). Additionally, the relationships between these constructs and general pedagogical beliefs (constructivist and traditional beliefs about teaching) will be explored to find how they matter for classroom teaching. The following research questions drove the analyses:

 

  • Is there a hidden structure of teachers’ identity constructs, motivation, and general pedagogical beliefs? If yes, then:
    • Are there meaningful clusters of motivations to teach, identity-related variables, and general pedagogical beliefs?
    • What is the importance of the subject taught? i.e., are motivation and identity primarily defined by the subject taught associated with general pedagogical beliefs?
    • Are there specific motivations to become a teacher relating to specific pedagogical beliefs (e.g., intrinsic value of teaching relating to constructivist beliefs)?

 Answers to the research questions were based on a multidimensional scaling (ALSCAL; Takane, Young, & DeLeeuw, 1997) analysis, including all the constructs.

In brief, this study aimed at gaining insight into how teachers’ self-beliefs fit with their pedagogical beliefs, and the role the subject taught plays in this connection.

Method

Participants consisted of 247 teachers in their first year of teacher education in the French-speaking part of Switzerland. Among them, 131 were pre-service general secondary education teachers and 116 were in-service vocational teachers who already teach in vocational schools. A questionnaire, including the following scales (Likert-scale with various anchors), was completed at the onset of teacher education. Motivation to teach. An adapted version of the “Factors influencing Teaching Choice” (Watt & Richardson, 2007) was used to assess seven types of motivation, each with 3 to 5 items: Aptitude, Intrinsic value, Social utility value, Personal utility value, Subject interest, Opportunity, and Fallback career. Teacher self-efficacy beliefs. The 12-item short version of “Ohio State Teacher Efficacy Scale” (Tschannen-Moran & Woolfolk Hoy, 2001) was used. Teacher sense of responsibility. The 12-item French version of the “Teacher Responsibility Scale” was used (Berger, Girardet, & Aprea, 2013; Lauermann & Karabenick, 2012). Strength of identity as a teacher. A 4-item scale assessed the degree to which the participants identify themselves as teachers. Perceived type of expertise. Based on the assumption that teachers’ professional identity is grounded in their self-perception of their expertise, one item assessed each of three types of expertise, namely perceived subject expertise, didactic expertise, and pedagogical expertise (Beijaard et al., 2000). Short definitions were provided for each type of expertise to clarify the meaning for participants. General pedagogical beliefs. 11 items were adapted from OECD (2009), and Chan and Elliott (2004) to assess direct transmission beliefs (5 items) and constructivist beliefs (6 items). Furthermore, participants reported about their years of experience in teaching, sex, and type of education (vocational vs general). All the scales were first analyzed by confirmatory factor analysis to verify their construct validity. Then, mean scores were computed and Cronbach’s alphas estimated. The next step was the multidimensional scaling (MDS) analysis using the ALSCAL procedure (Euclidian distance) available in SPSS. This procedure is exploratory: Using MDS, the researcher tries to find some sense by extracting hidden structures in the data. Solutions including 1 to 5 dimensions were estimated. Based on interpretability and statistical evidence, a 2-dimension solution was retained (Stress=.26; squared correlation=.60). Finally, associations between motivation, identity-related constructs, and general pedagogical beliefs with experience, sex, and type of education (vocational vs general) were investigated using MANOVA (nota bene: these analyses are not discussed in the proposal but will be part of the presentation).

Expected Outcomes

A figure of the final MDS 2-dimension model cannot be included in the proposal. The dimensions of the model were interpreted in the following way. Dimension 1 represents the opposition between extrinsic and intrinsic motivation (and variables conceptually tied to this motivation such as aptitude or strength of identity). Variables related to the subject taught fall in between. Dimension 2 represents the opposition of pedagogy-general constructs (e.g.,constructivist beliefs) vs constructs focusing on the specific subject taught (e.g.,perceived subject expertise). Based on this interpretation of the dimensions and proximity of the variables in the model, the following conclusions were reached: 1.The seven types of motivation to teach are clearly separated into three clusters: a) extrinsic motivations: fallback career, opportunity, and personal utility value; b) intrinsic value, aptitude, and social utility value; finally c) subject interest falls around the middle of Dimension 1. 2.Strength of teaching identity, teacher self-efficacy beliefs, and the three motivations rated as the most important (aptitude, intrinsic value, and social utility value) cluster together to form what might be interpreted as the core constructs of teacher identity. Strength of teaching identity falls nearly in between the two clusters on Dimension 2, meaning that it might also be defined by the subject taught. 3.Direct transmission beliefs are associated with subject-related constructs (perceived expertise with the subject taught and with subject didactics, and Subject interest). 4.Teacher responsibility and perceived expertise with pedagogy form a cluster; they are close from the core identity cluster on Dimension 1 but opposite to the subject-related cluster on Dimension 2. 5.Constructivist beliefs are isolated: their correlations with the other clusters are weak: These beliefs are largely independent from identity and motivation constructs. The conclusions of the present study shed some light on the associations or clustering of multiple constructs usually treated independently in the literature.

References

Beijaard, D., Meijer, P. C., & Verloop, N. (2004). Reconsidering research on teachers' professional identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 107-128. Beijaard, D., Verloop, N., & Vermunt, J. D. (2000). Teachers' perceptions of professional identity: an exploratory study from a personal knowledge perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 749-764. Berger, J.-L., Girardet, C., & Aprea, C. (2013, August). The motivational antecedents of VET teachers’ sense of responsibility and its effect on classroom management self-reported practices. In S. A. Karabenick (Chair) & R. Butler (Discussant), Antecedent and consequences of teacher responsibility. Symposium presented at the 15th Biennial Conference of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction, Munich, Germany, August 27 - 31. Canrinus, E. T., Helms-Lorenz, M., Beijaard, D., Buitink, J., & Hofman, A. (2011). Profiling teachers' sense of professional identity. Educational Studies, 37(5), 593-608. Chan, K.-W., & Elliott, R. G. (2004). Relational analysis of personal epistemology and conceptions about teaching and learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 817-831. Giguère, G. (2006). Collecting and analyzing data in multidimensional scaling experiments: A guide for psychologists using SPSS. Tutorial in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 2(1), 26-37. Huberman, M. (1989/1993). The lives of teachers. New York: Teachers College Press. Lauermann, F., & Karabenick, S. A. (2012). The meaning and measure of teachers' sense of responsibility for educational outcomes. Teaching and Teacher Education, 30, 13-26. OECD (2009). Creating effective teaching and learning environments: First results from TALIS. Paris: OECD. Richardson, P. W., Karabenick, S. A., & Watt, H. M. G. (Eds.) (2014). Teacher Motivation: Theory and Practice. Routledge: New York. Takane, Y., Young, F. W., & DeLeeuw, J. (1997). Nonmetric individual differences multidimensional scaling: An alternative least square method with optimal scaling procedure. Psychometrika, 42, 7-67. Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 783-805. Watt, H. M. G., & Richardson, P. W. (2007). Motivational factors influencing teaching as a career choice: Development and validation of the FIT-Choice scale. Journal of Experimental Education, 75(3), 167-202. Woolfolk Hoy, A., Davis, H., & Pape, S. (2006). Teachers’ knowledge and beliefs. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne (Ed.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 715-737). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Author Information

Jean-Louis Berger (presenting / submitting)
Swiss Federal Institute for Vocational Education and Training
R & D
Renens
Swiss Federal Institute for Vocational Education and Training, Switzerland
Swiss Federal Institute for Vocational Education and Training, Switzerland
Swiss Federal Institute for Vocational Education and Training, Switzerland
University of Geneva, Switzerland
University of Geneva, Switzerland

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.