Session Information
25 SES 06, Citizenship and Democracy
Paper Session
Contribution
This paper is a contribution from the research project “Democracy, Participation and Inclusive Education in Schools” (EDU2012-39556-C02-02) a three year long research started in 2013. This paper focuses on the research of the second year project to find out what kind of learning activities are provided in each school to improve democracy and how pupils experience their participation.
We would like to outline how they value their participation in school in order to contrast the vision between teachers and pupils. The main focus during the second year project is to analyse the student’s point of view because we want to see how inclusion and equity in schools are experienced throughout their views about participation.
A fully democratic society guarantees dialogue, critical analysis, the ability to contribute and the involvement of everyone’s decision-making process and, in addition, those whose have recently migrated. According to Biesta & Lawy (2009: 7) “young people learn at least as much about democracy and citizenship – including their own citizenship – through their participation in the range of different practices that make up their lives.” Consequently, according to Fielding (2011) and Silva Dias & Menezes (2013), children and adults are recognized as active participants, as co-authors in a process of intergenerational learning, as critical and reflective citizens in the school context.
Fielding (2011) and Barbosa (2000) asserted that learning democracy is not only limited in the specific curricular spaces for citizenship education but also, like Dewey (1916) and Apple and Beane (1997), school can be an excellent participatory and learning environment to have different sorts of experiences, throughout the school structure. Edelstein (2011) argued “learning democracy” consists of a variety of interconnected tasks: 1) learning about democracy in order to become a conscious and democratic actor in future situations, 2) learning through democracy by participating in a democratic school community and 3) learning for democracy including the construction of ongoing development of democratic forms of life.
However different findings pointed out the difficulty to have democratic experiences at school. Biesta & Lawy (2009: 21) said: “many young people continue to regard school as a non-democratic institution suffused with rules and regulations. There is some evidence to suggest that this has served to only emphasize the lack of control and ‘felt’ agency of young people over significant portions of their lives” or Guerin et al. (2013:427) stated: “the feasibility of a participative approach to citizenship education has been questioned through theoretical and empirical critical analysis. On this basis, we suggest that the scope of the citizenship education curriculum should be reconsidered or that teacher and head teacher should receive the necessary and adequate training, and support to implement such a participatory structure”.
From this perspective, the research aims to understand and contrast different perspectives about participatory and democratic experiences from teachers and pupils.
Method
Expected Outcomes
References
Apple, M. W.; Beane, J. A. (Comps) (1997). Democratic Schools. Virginia: ASCD. Barbosa, M. (2000). Educar per a una ciutadania democràtica a les escoles: una discussió de models. Temps d’Educació, 24, 2n semestre, 359-379. Biesta, G.; Lawy, R. (2006). From teaching citizenship to learning democracy: overcoming individualism in research, policy and practice. Cambridge Journal of Education, 36:1, 63-79. Cook-Sather, a. (2006). Sound, Presence, and Power: “Student Voice” in Educational Research and Reform, Curriculum Inquiry 36:4, 359-388. Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and Education. New York: MacMillan. Edelstein, W. (2011). Education for Democracy: reasons and strategies. European Journal of Education, 46:1, 127-137. Fielding, M. (2011). Student's voice and the possibility of radical democratic education: Re-narrating forgotten histories, developping alternative futures. In G. Czerniawski; W. Kidd (Eds.) The student voice handbook: Bridging the acaemic/practitioner divide. Bingley: Emerald. Guérin, L.J.; van der Ploeg, P. A.; Sins, P.H.M. (2013). Citizenship education: the feasibility of a participative approach, Educational Research, 55:4, 427-440. Heath, S.; Brooks, R.; Cleaver, E.; Ireland, E. (2009). Researching Young People's Lives. Uk: Sage. Krueger, R.; Casey, M. (2000). Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. California: Sage. Pascal, C.; Bertram. T. (2009). Listening to young citizens: the struggle to make real a participatory paradigm in research with young children. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 17:2, 249-262. Silva Dias, T.; Menezes, I. (2013). The role of classroom experiences and school ethos in the development as political actors: Confronting the vision of pupils and teachers Educational & Child Psychology, 30:1; 26-37.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.