Some Reflections on Young Children’s Perspectives of Democracy in Schools
Conference:
ECER 2014
Format:
Paper

Session Information

25 SES 06, Citizenship and Democracy

Paper Session

Time:
2014-09-03
15:30-17:00
Room:
B034 Anfiteatro
Chair:
Jonathon Sargeant

Contribution

This paper is a contribution from the research project “Democracy, Participation and Inclusive Education in Schools” (EDU2012-39556-C02-02) a three year long research started in 2013. This paper focuses on the research of the second year project to find out what kind of learning activities are provided in each school to improve democracy and how pupils experience their participation.

We would like to outline how they value their participation in school in order to contrast the vision between teachers and pupils. The main focus during the second year project is to analyse the student’s point of view because we want to see how inclusion and equity in schools are experienced throughout their  views about participation.  

A fully democratic society guarantees dialogue, critical analysis, the ability to contribute and the involvement of everyone’s decision-making process and, in addition, those whose have recently migrated. According to Biesta & Lawy (2009: 7) “young people learn at least as much about democracy and citizenship – including their own citizenship – through their participation in the range of different practices that make up their lives.”  Consequently, according to Fielding (2011) and Silva Dias & Menezes (2013), children and adults are recognized as active participants, as co-authors in a process of intergenerational learning, as critical and reflective citizens in the school context.

Fielding (2011) and Barbosa (2000) asserted that learning democracy is not only limited in the specific curricular spaces for citizenship education but also, like Dewey (1916) and Apple and Beane (1997), school can be an excellent participatory and learning environment to have different sorts of experiences, throughout the school structure. Edelstein (2011) argued “learning democracy” consists of a variety of interconnected tasks: 1) learning about democracy in order to become a conscious and democratic actor in future situations, 2) learning through democracy by participating in a democratic school community and 3) learning for democracy including the construction of ongoing development of democratic forms of life.  

However different findings pointed out the difficulty to have democratic experiences at school. Biesta & Lawy (2009: 21) said: “many young people continue to regard school as a non-democratic institution suffused with rules and regulations. There is some evidence to suggest that this has served to only emphasize the lack of control and ‘felt’ agency of young people over significant portions of their lives” or Guerin et al. (2013:427) stated: “the feasibility of a participative approach to citizenship education has been questioned through theoretical and empirical critical analysis. On this basis, we suggest that the scope of the citizenship education curriculum should be reconsidered or that teacher and head teacher should receive the necessary and adequate training, and support to implement such a participatory structure”.

From this perspective, the research aims to understand and contrast different perspectives about participatory and democratic experiences from teachers and pupils.

Method

Having collected the perspectives of view from the teachers about democracy in the school together with written reports about different kinds of democratic experiences from each school, we are now at a point where we would like to listen to the student’s opinion. Our intention is to hear their experiences of democracy and participation in school in terms of governance (autonomy and involvement in decision-making processes in different faces of the school life), habitability (physical conditions of the centre, family conditions and school climate), and otherness (multidimensional recognition of the other: legal, social and affective). However we take into account of the complexity of interviewing young people about their experience of democracy in a research (Cook-Sather, 2006; Pascal and Bertram, 2009). Although we explore different methods to interview the youth, we are aware of our time restrictions and most importantly the goals set when our research began. Consequently, in our research, we will try a first approach with students aged 11 (in the last year of primary school) and 15 years old (in the last year of secondary school), looking at their own experience. The process will be the following: the first meeting will be open to everybody. We will organize different discussion groups where researchers and participants will be involved in a collaborative form of research (Krueger & Casey, 2000) in each of the 10 schools of the study. Heath et al. (2009: 90) argued that "groups interviews allow researchers to explore the processes whereby young people create share meaning and understandings". After doing these discussion groups, we want to identify which are the more relevant school experiences about democracy for some students and contrast their vision with the perspective of teachers.

Expected Outcomes

Three main results will be explored in this paper. The first is linked to analyze the nature of different democratic experiences in each school that teachers value in the Research Project in terms of governance, habitability and otherness. We would like to evaluate with them, the intensity of democratic presence in the three different levels of democratic practices: organizing different kinds of democratic learning activities inside classrooms as an instrument of democratic self-regulation, service learning as a social project in the community and civic engagement projects as a basis for cultivating the democratic action in the local community (Edelstein, 2011). The second result is to analyze the experiences of the students who participated in the discussion groups in order to find out what kind of atmosphere they experience in school, and if, in the last years, their sense of belonging and empowerment have improved. Finally the third result is to contrast and interact the experiences of teachers and students. The contrast between these different perspectives could be a good way to analyze, in every centre, different experiences of democracy from the school to the community in different levels (inside classrooms, in different service learning projects and in the local community) in terms of governance, habitability and otherness.

References

Apple, M. W.; Beane, J. A. (Comps) (1997). Democratic Schools. Virginia: ASCD. Barbosa, M. (2000). Educar per a una ciutadania democràtica a les escoles: una discussió de models. Temps d’Educació, 24, 2n semestre, 359-379. Biesta, G.; Lawy, R. (2006). From teaching citizenship to learning democracy: overcoming individualism in research, policy and practice. Cambridge Journal of Education, 36:1, 63-79. Cook-Sather, a. (2006). Sound, Presence, and Power: “Student Voice” in Educational Research and Reform, Curriculum Inquiry 36:4, 359-388. Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and Education. New York: MacMillan. Edelstein, W. (2011). Education for Democracy: reasons and strategies. European Journal of Education, 46:1, 127-137. Fielding, M. (2011). Student's voice and the possibility of radical democratic education: Re-narrating forgotten histories, developping alternative futures. In G. Czerniawski; W. Kidd (Eds.) The student voice handbook: Bridging the acaemic/practitioner divide. Bingley: Emerald. Guérin, L.J.; van der Ploeg, P. A.; Sins, P.H.M. (2013). Citizenship education: the feasibility of a participative approach, Educational Research, 55:4, 427-440. Heath, S.; Brooks, R.; Cleaver, E.; Ireland, E. (2009). Researching Young People's Lives. Uk: Sage. Krueger, R.; Casey, M. (2000). Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. California: Sage. Pascal, C.; Bertram. T. (2009). Listening to young citizens: the struggle to make real a participatory paradigm in research with young children. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 17:2, 249-262. Silva Dias, T.; Menezes, I. (2013). The role of classroom experiences and school ethos in the development as political actors: Confronting the vision of pupils and teachers Educational & Child Psychology, 30:1; 26-37.

Author Information

Núria Simó (presenting / submitting)
University of Vic
Pedagogy
Vic (Barcelona)
Antoni Tort (presenting)
University of Vic
Vic
University of Vic
Pedagogy
Vic
Universitat de Vic
Pedagogy Department
Roda de Ter
Universitat de Vic
Barcelona
University of Girona, Spain

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.