Session Information
14 SES 08 B, School-Related Transitions Within a Life Course Perspective (Part 3)
Paper Session: continued from 14 SES 01 B, 14 SES 02 B and to be continued in 14 SES 09B
Contribution
In this paper we present a participatory research process developed in a Pre-primary and Primary school located in a Spanish village. Along the research process the school analysed and rethought its views and practices on Educational Transition between the Infant and Primary school stages. The general aim was to improve the way in which transitions were undertaken at school in order to promote a more inclusive process. This individual aim was finally re-designed and the study undertook transitions at a community level. This means that the whole school community took part in the study, which was developed both inside and outside the school.
The process followed in this school is part of a bigger research funded by the Spanish National Research Plan (EDU2011-2928-C03-01) in which all the Infant and Primary schools from the same local community are engaged. The participation of schools is similar in the way that each of them follows a participative and self-designed process to improve their own school. But schools are different from other schools in relation to the topic or question analysed. Each individual institution is engaged in an unique process that is based in several democratic activities developed inside the schools. In addition to these intra-school processes, schools are committed to interchange and develop some common activities trough an inter-school network. Beyond the schools, community educational and social services are invited to participate and collaborate in the pursuing of a better and more equitable society and school local system.
The school concern for Educational Transitions began in 2010, particularly regarding the transition from Infant to Primary education. But this school interest was later assessed as relevant by all schools and was proposed as a common topic to analyse and study at a community level. In 2012 the question of Educational Transitions was put forward at local level. Thus, by being initiated as an individual school project, it would become a shared community project.
The relevance of educational transitions is clear. We are witnesses to this concern occurring in the international arena (Griebel and Niesel, 2002; Margetts, 2007; Vogler, Crivello and Woodhead, 2008) to deal with the transitions throughout the educational stages, particularly from the first childhood. UNICEF (2012) stated: “readiness for school is the basis of an equitable and quality education (…). It receives increasing support worldwide as a viable method for helping very young boys and girls to achieve their full potential in terms of development and to allow them to have a type of learning that lasts all their lives” (p. 3). According to studies conducted in places such as Australia, Canada, the U.S.A., New Zealand, Singapore and in European countries, it is critical the way in which educational transitions are designed and developed (Fabian & Dunlop, 2007).
For this reason, it is underlined the need to plan the transition between all the agents involved in transitions so that this process can be undergone gradually, in a continuous, without being either brusque or traumatic for schoolchildren (Argos, Ezquerra and Castro, 2011). The importance of planning the transitions by the schools also lies in the fact that if educational practices differ from one teaching staff to another, or from one school to another, then difficulties may arise in terms of the socialization and learning of the pupils, with short and long term implications often related to processes of school failure, dropout or exclusion (UNICEF, 2010).
Method
Expected Outcomes
References
ARGOS GONZÁLEZ, J.; EZQUERRA MUÑOZ, M.P. and CASTRO ZUBIZARRETA, A. (2011). Metáforas de la transición: la relación entre la Escuela Infantil y la Escuela Primaria y la perspectiva de futuros docentes de Educación Infantil. Educación XXI, 14, 1, 135-156. FABIAN, H. and DUNLOP, A.W. (2007). Outcomes of good practice in transition processes for children entering primary school. The Hague (The Netherlands): Bernard van Leer Foundation. GRIEBEL, W. and NIESEL, R. (2002). Coconstructing transition into kindergarten and school, in FABIAN, H. and DUNLOP, A-W. (eds.)Transitions in the Early Years: Debating continuity and progression for children in early education. London, UK: Routledge Falmer, 64 -76. MARGETTS, K. (2007). Preparing children for school - benefits and privileges. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 32 (2), 43-50. UNICEF (2010). School readiness and transitions. New York, UNICEF UNICEF. (2012). Preparación para la escuela y las transiciones. UNICEF: EEUU. http://www.unicef.org/cfs/files/CFS_School_SP_Web_final_21.2.13.pdf VOGLER, P.; CRIVELLO, G. and WOODHEAD, M. (2008). La investigación sobre las transiciones en la primera infancia: Análisis de nociones, teorías y prácticas. Cuadernos sobre Desarrollo Infantil Temprano 48, Documento de trabajo 48, La Haya, Países Bajos: Fundación Bernard van Leer. WENGER, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.