The Contribution of E-portfolio to Reflection and Assessment
Author(s):
Conference:
ECER 2014
Format:
Paper

Session Information

10 SES 08 D, Entrepreneurship, Gender and E-portfolios

Paper Session

Time:
2014-09-04
09:00-10:30
Room:
B228 Sala de Aulas
Chair:
Hugh Busher

Contribution

In Higher Education institutions there is a big difficulty in the e-portfolio construction strategy. There is no balance between the ideas of the e-portfolio as a process – a philosophical document of the learning process, and the e-portfolio as a product – a presentation of goals achieved. In a teachers education paradigm this situation ends up aiming to concentrate on the certification of competences (Barrett, 2003; Cano, 2005; Shulman, 1999).

We claim, therefore, for the need of a teacher education process balancing the certification of competences and the learning process where students –future teachers – are in the centre. We believe this is possible through the use of the e-portfolio, based on five stages – collection, selection, reflection, direction and presentation all of them sustained by the assessment allowing holistic and reflective learning (Barberà & Martín, 2009; Barrett, 2006, 2011; Barrett & Garrett, 2009; Stefani, Mason, & Pegler, 2007).

In this regard, creating an e-portfolio takes five stages requires the four dimensions of knowledge essential to develop proficiencies considered as “knowing by doing” being used in an suitable way according to the context. Helped by the teacher the student collects of evidences (collection) and evaluates them. He shows those that are well constructed. He makes a reflection about his work, recognizing the goals achieved, identifying the difficulties found and presenting possible competences to be developed (reflection). The teacher offer feedback and feedforward to the student giving him the opportunity to improve his performance outlining strategies and goals that sustain the learning processes (projection/direction). Finally the student is invited to present and share his e-portfolio to the teacher and his peers (presentation).

Thus the e-portfolio is established on the constructive model to promote reflection, evaluation, direction and understanding, involving the student in a lifelong learning process. E-portfolio is then a thoughtful activity that increases self-judgment but also the judgment about others where social bias is present.

The main question of the investigation is: How does the construction of the e-portfolio allow the balance between student-centred learning (teacher education) and certification of competences? In this regard, we set up four questions: (1) How can the construction of the e-portfolio promote the development of reflection?; (2) How can the organization of the e-portfolio support the digital competence?; (3) How can the structure of the e-portfolio foster the balance between formative and summative assessment?; (4) How can the e-portfolio construction favour learning communities?

Consequently, the investigation has the following goals: (1) to see how the construction of the e-portfolio promotes the development of reflection; (2) to examine how the organization of the e-portfolio supports the digital competence; (3) to inquire how the structure of the e-portfolio promotes the balance between formative and summative assessment; (4) analyse how the creation of the e-portfolio favours learning communities.

Method

This study is a qualitative research, more concretely a multiple case study. Therefore we are aware of the subjectivity in the research (Stake, 1995). We select the case study because it allows us to understand deeply the pertinence of the construction of the e-portfolio. This research focuses on analysing the balance between the e-portfolio for learning (focusing on the student's purposes) and e-porfolio for summative assessment (focusing on the institution's purposes) with the goal of a professional development throughout life. This study analyses the relevance of using the e-portfolio in the teacher education context - Master of Teaching Music Education Basic Education - and questions the effect of the investigation on the performance of those who answered the interviews. The study questions deeply the teaching practice. Our methodological option is the qualitative paradigm, namely the case study of fifteen e-portfolio supported by documental analysis: bibliographical investigation and reading books, thesis, articles; official and no official documents; fifteen e-portfolio created by fifteen student – teacher education – in the scholar years 2010/2011 and 2011/2012). It is also qualified by three semi-structured interviews: two students – in teacher education process – and their tutor responsible for the curricular subject “Personal Portfolio” support given for the organization of their portfolio during the scholar years 2010/2011 and 2011/2012. The case study focuses on the e-portfolio defined in a specific time (2010/2011 and 2011/2012) and a specific context (Higher Education – Private).

Expected Outcomes

The construction of the e-portfolio promotes the development of the confidence between students – teacher education – and the teacher. Consequently the students revels to the teacher their learning difficulties. This relationship supported by the confidence is constructed because the e-portfolio promotes the reflection about professional and academic dimension and at the same time about person beliefs and experiences. Therefore this study allows to indicate that we need to be aware that the quality of teacher education is promoted by the interaction of four dimensions of knowledge essential to develop proficiencies considered as “knowing by doing” being used in an suitable way according to the context. In addition this study allow us to know that the digital dimension of the e-portfolio is very important for three reasons: (1) it is easier to change the e-portfolio than the portfolio and this is an important thing because it regards and respects the mutation of knowledge; (2) the promotion of the creation of links between the different subject or contents through hypertext; (3) the possibility of using multilanguage (text, image, sound, video, scheme/diagram) allowing students to express in the way that they think it is the best way for them. Therefore the e-portfolio can be a strategy to motivate the students.

References

Bárbera, E., & Martín, E. (2009). Portfolio eletrónico: Aprender a evaluar el aprendizaje. Barcelona: Editorial Universitat Oberta de Catalunya. Barrett, H. (2003). Presentation at first international conference on the e-portfolio. Retrieved from http://electronicportfolios.com/portfolios/eifel.pdf. _______ (2006). Using electronic portfolios for formative / classroom-based assessment. Retrieved from http://electronicportfolios.com/portfolios/ConnectedNewsletter-final.pdf. _______ (2011). Balancing the two faces of e-portfolios (2ª ed.). Education for a Digital World: Advice, Guidelines, and Effective Practice from Around the Globe. Retrieved from http://electronicportfolios.org/balance/balancingarticle2.pdf. Barrett, H., & Garrett, P. N. (2009). Online Personal Learning Environments: Structuring Electronic Portfolios for Lifelong and Life Wide Learning. On the Horizon, 17(2), 142-152. Retrieved from https://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dd76m5s2_39fsmjdk. Cano, E. (2005). El portafolios del profesorado universitario – Un instrument el desarrollo profesional. Barcelona: Educación Universitaria – Octaedro / Instituto de Ciencias de la Educación – Universidad de Barcelona. Shulman, L. (1999). Portafolios del docente: Una actividad teórica. In N. Lyons (Org.), El uso de portafolios – Propuestas para un nuevo profesionalismo docente (pp. 45-62). Buenos Aires: Amorrortu. Stake, R. E. (1995). A arte da investigação com estudos de caso (2ª ed.). Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkien. Stefani, L.; Mason, R., & Pegler, C. (2007). The educational potential of e-portfolios. Supporting personal development and reflective learning. London e New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.

Author Information

Susana Gonçalves (presenting / submitting)
University of Santiago de Compostela
Didatica e Organização Escolar
Arcozelo
University of Santiago de Compostela
Didactics and School Organisation
Santiago de Compostela
University of Santiago de Compostela, Portugal

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.