Scale And Determinants Of ‘Financial Literacy’ In First Year Undergraduate Students: A Cross-National Study
Author(s):
Neil Harrison (presenting / submitting) Steve Agnew
Conference:
ECER 2014
Format:
Paper

Session Information

22 SES 05 C, Student Transitions and Graduate Employability

Paper Session

Time:
2014-09-03
11:00-12:30
Room:
B022 Anfiteatro
Chair:
Gutiérrez-Esteban Prudencia

Contribution

‘Financial literacy’ is a term used to describe a range of factual knowledge and conceptual understanding relating to an individual’s capacity engage with the workings of personal finance – e.g. savings, borrowing, taxation, investment, pensions and so on.  It is generally hypothesised that individuals with higher financial literacy will make more economically rational decisions and indulge in less risky behaviours with respect to their own finances, both in the short-run and the long-term.

In many countries, it is perceived that there is something of a crisis of financial literacy among adolescents and young adults (e.g. Atkinson et al 2007; Lusardi and Mitchell 2011).  This is associated with short-term decision-making, a failure to delay gratification, excessive use of debt and a failure to minimise costs or maximise benefits (e.g. paying too much tax or choosing low return investments).  It is argued that these individuals are developing bad behaviours that will cause difficulties for them and for wider society as they move into adulthood and the more significant financial decisions that it brings, although there are questions about the predictive power of financial literacy on behaviour (e.g. Mandell and Klein 2009).

A particular group of young adults who are expected to make financial decisions with far-reaching consequences is comprised of students.  In many countries, students are finding themselves deciding on how much personal debt to accrue and from what sources, as well as entering into taxation systems for the first time.  In the UK, for example, many students will be borrowing approximately £9,000 per year for their tuition fees and £4,000 per year towards their living costs through a student loans, as well as using credit cards and overdrafts to meet any shortfall.

Financial literacy is therefore likely to be of key importance to higher education students in terms of guiding (and potentially defining) the decisions that they make.  However, previous studies have suggested that financial literacy may be lower for women, people from minority ethnic communities and those from lower socio-economic groups (e.g. Chen and Volpe 1998; Murphy 2005; Lusardi et al 2010).  This suggests that some students may be less well prepared for the financial components of university life than others.

While there have been many within-country studies of financial literacy, there is little international comparative data available.  It has not, therefore, been possible to compare how well different countries might prepare their young people, nor how financial literacy might be impacted by demographic factors.  The 2012 PISA exercise has collected data from eighteen countries that will be released in mid 2014 and this will provide useful contextual data for this study, which is based around data from the UK, the US and New Zealand (NZ).

This study aims to investigate the levels of financial literacy in different countries, with specific respect to the following research questions:

  1. Do comparable samples of young people from different countries present similar levels of financial literacy?
  2. Which demographic or personality factors are significant predictors for financial literacy levels, and is the group of predictors consistent between different countries?
  3. Are financial literacy levels linked to between-country differences in policy on financial education?

Method

This paper will report the findings of an international study drawing on quantitative data from the UK, NZ and the US. Data were collected from three universities having a comparable mid-range status within their own country and teaching across a wide curriculum. The sampling frame comprised full-time ‘home’ (i.e. not international) undergraduates on business or social science programmes. 686 students completed an online questionnaire around four months into their first year of study, comprising a collective response rate of around 20%. The component of the questionnaire to be reported in this paper comprised: (a) demographic background questions (gender, ethnicity, age and parents’ educational level); (b) a 10 item personality inventory drawn from the ‘Big Five’ model (John et al 1991; Rammstedt and John 2007), and; (c) a short multiple-choice test of financial literacy, with five questions spanning compound interest, inflation, taxation rates and financial discounting. The samples were found to be broadly representative of the populations from which they were drawn, on the basis of the demographic markers. The financial literacy test used identical questions across the three countries, with the exception of minor changes of vocabulary (e.g. locally-specific tax names). It focused on universal principles that underpin financial decision-making, such as understanding that inflation reduces real value and that interest is compounded over time, as well as the ability to compare two financial propositions and rationally evaluate (in economic terms) the correct course of action. It is therefore considered to have cross-national comparative value, although it is possible that such knowledge may have more or less value in different cultural contexts. The score on the financial literacy test (ranging from zero to five) becomes the dependent variable in a ordinal regression analysis, with the demographic variables, personality indices and a dummy variable for country as the independent predictor variables. This will reveal which factors have a significant impact on a student’s financial literacy. Separate analyses will be undertaken for each country to explore whether the three countries share a model of financial literacy and, if not, what the basis for difference is.

Expected Outcomes

At the time of writing, only very preliminary analyses have been undertaken. These do show a significant difference in financial literacy scores, with NZ having higher levels than the UK and the US. Furthermore, it appears that the predictors for financial literacy differ between countries, with the demographic factors having much less effect in NZ. This could be related to the strenuous governmental policy efforts around financial literacy in NZ, with a mandated programme in secondary schools. This is in contrast to more patchy coverage in the UK and US, where the importance of demographic factors may reflect that efforts are not reaching all sections of society. The full analysis will be completed in Spring 2014.

References

Atkinson, A., S. McKay, E. Kempson and S. Collard (2007) Levels of Financial Capability in the UK. Public Money & Management 27: 29-36. Chen, H. and R. Volpe (1998) An analysis of personal financial literacy among college students. Financial Services Review 7: 107–128. John, O., E. Donahue and R. Kentle (1991) The Big Five Inventory--Versions 4a and 54. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley. Lusardi, A. and O. Mitchell (2011) Financial literacy around the world: an overview. Journal of Pension Economics and Finance 10: 497-508. Lusardi, A., O. Mitchell and C. Curto (2010) Financial literacy among the young. Journal of Consumer Affairs 44: 358-380. Mandell, L. and L. Klein (2009) The Impact of Financial Literacy Education on Subsequent Financial Behavior. Journal of Financial Counseling and Planning 20: 15-24. Murphy, A. (2005) Money, Money, Money: An Exploratory Study on the Financial Literacy of Black College Students. College Student Journal 39: 478-488. Rammstadt, B. and O. John (2007) Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German. Journal of Research in Personality 41: 203-212.

Author Information

Neil Harrison (presenting / submitting)
University of the West of England, United Kingdom
University of Canterbury, New Zealand

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.